Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • What Might an Extension Look Like with Brandon Woodruff?


    Seth Stohs

    I think we can all agree that it will be a very interesting offseason for the Milwaukee Brewers. Between free agency and possible trades, the front office should be busy. The idea of locking up some key players to long-term deals may also be a theme this offseason. Today, we start this series by considering what a contract extension with Brandon Woodruff look like?

    Image courtesy of Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

    Brewers Video

     

    There will be many interesting decisions to be made this offseason. It is very possible that the front office may have more conversations internally about Brandon Woodruff than anyone else. He is under team control for the next two seasons and has earned significant raises. They could just go year to year. They should at least work with Woodruff’s representatives about a long-term deal, but if he is completely against that idea and looking to become a free agent, the Brewers owe it to themselves and the fans to consider trading him at peak value. 

    But in this article, we are discussing the idea of a long-term contract extension with Woodruff. There are, of course, several factors that go into the decision to retain a player for an extended period of time. 

    The first factor, obviously, is performance. Performance can be looked at in two ways. First, consider his statistics and track record. Well, Woodruff has been an All-Star twice in the past three seasons with All-Star games (there was no game in 2020). His ERA+ since 2019 have been 123, 149, 161, and 129. He received Cy Young votes in 2021 when he went just 9-10 but had an ERA of 2.56 and a WHIP of 0.97. In an average year, he is worth more than 3 fWAR. Based on that, he has been worth $108.7 million over the past four years. 

    The performance also speaks to his stuff. Has he lost anything, velocity, spin, etc.? Well, Woodruff’s average fastball in 2019 was 96.3 mph. In 2022, it was 96.2 mph. He’s got a four-pitch mix. He’s got good control and command. 

    So there are the reasons that the Brewers should absolutely want to lock up such a talented arm. In addition, anyone who has watched the playoffs knows that for a team to make a legitimate run toward a World Series title, they have to have at least two, and preferably three or four top starting pitchers. 

    A big concern, especially with pitchers, has to be an injury. While past health doesn’t necessarily mean a pitcher will remain healthy, the track record is really all teams have to go by (although, they get access to his medicals before such expenditures are made). 

    Brandon Woodruff has been on the Injured List three times. In 2019, he had an Oblique injury. In September of 2021, he was out with an illness. In May, he missed time with a sprained ankle. At that time, he confirmed that he had been diagnosed with Raynaud’s syndrome. It is a circulatory condition that causes numbness in the extremities due to reduced blood flow. While it doesn’t appear to have any real short or long-term effects, it is something to keep in mind. 

    Comparable Contracts
    There have been a couple of long-term extensions for pitchers with similar success to Woodruff. Late this season, Luis Castillo signed a five-year, $108 million deal with a vesting option for 2028. Last November, the Blue Jays signed Jose Berrios to a seven-year, $131 million contract. 

    Let’s start with the Berrios contract. The Puerto Rican right-hander had been acquired by Toronto from the Minnesota Twins in exchange for top prospects Austin Martin and Simeon Woods Richardson. It certainly had to be a goal of the Blue Jays’ front office to keep him beyond the 2022 season. He was able to get a seven-year deal because he was about two years younger than Woodruff at the time of the deal. 

    Luis Castillo is actually about three months older than Woodruff and their service time is very similar. Castillo has twice been an All Star and put up terrific numbers in Cincinnati. He was acquired by the Mariners before the trade deadline this year and pitched very well in a pennant race and in the playoffs. Castillo has three plus-pitches and his fastball is just a bit faster than Woodruff’s, but the Brewers’ co-ace has slightly better statistics. His FanGraphs WAR has been worth $112.3 million over the past four seasons.  

      Berrios Castillo
    2022 $10.70  
    2023 $15.70 $11.40
    2024 $17.70 $24.15
    2025 $18.70 $24.15
    2026 $18.80 $24.15
    2027 $24.70 $24.15
    2028 $24.70 $25.00

    There are a few things about these two agreements that the Brewers could choose to add to a Woodruff deal. For instance, if Castillo throws 180 or more innings in 2027, his $25 million contract vests. However, if he missed 130 or more days in 2025 through 2027 with a UCL injury, it becomes a $5 million team option. He has a full no-trade clause for the first three years of the deal, and if he’s traded over those final three years, he gets a $1 million bonus. Berrios has an opt-out after the 2026 season. There is a limited no-trade clause. He also has incentives in his deal based on his performance in 2025 and 2026 that could increase his 2027 and 2028 contracts by up to $5 million. 

    So, let’s get to a proposal I would send to Woodruff and his agents and advisors. 

      Age Salary Signing Bonus Total
    2023 29 $10.50 $1.50 $12.00
    2024 30 $21.00 $1.50 $22.50
    2025 31 $21.50 $1.50 $23.00
    2026 32 $22.00 $1.25 $23.25
    2027 33 $23.00 $1.25 $24.25
    2028 34 $25.00 buyout $5  

    This contract is incredibly similar to Castillo’s overall. I’ve included signing bonuses for each season. It would guarantee Woodruff five years and $110 million, an average annual value of $22 million. I personally like to include a team option or two, and in this case, I have an option for a sixth season at $25 million with a $5 million buyout. So, the contract could be worth $130 million over six seasons. 

    I think that deal, if it could be completed, would be a home run for the Brewers and a very fair deal for Woodruff. Maybe a home run for both?

    So what do you think? Is this a contract that you would feel comfortable with the Brewers offering Brandon Woodruff? If his side is willing to negotiate from there, fantastic. If they basically scoff at the offer, then the team should reach out to other organizations to see what his trade value is. If they’re not happy with the offers, then you offer him arbitration, have him pitch in 2023 for something around $10-12 million, and try again next offseason with the same three options.  

    Your turn. Share your thoughts.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Brewer Fanatic wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM BREWER FANATIC
    — Latest Brewers coverage from our writers
    — Recent Brewers discussion in our forums
    — Follow Brewer Fanatic via Twitter, Facebook or email

    • Like 1
     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Tremendous article that effectively summarizes my precise thoughts on a Woodruff extension. In particular, this quote: "anyone who has watched the playoffs knows that for a team to make a legitimate run toward a World Series title, they have to have at least two, and preferably three or four top starting pitchers." While we have some really promising position players starting to emerge from our farm system, eventually to be headlined by Chourio, we remain short on high-impact arms, which as you state, are necessary for a "legitimate run" at a WS. Obviously, we have Peralta and Ashby locked up already, but what would really help is locking up one of our sure-fire, top 10 aces in Burnes and Woodruff to front a sustained World Series push over the next 5-6 years. Woodruff, for obvious reasons, is the most likely candidate, and the deal you propose is eminently reasonable for both player and club. Then, you can trade Burnes to obtain your next generation of superstar pitchers (i.e., Rodriguez, Espino, Tiedemann, Miller, Stone, etc.). 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tremendous article that effectively summarizes my precise thoughts on a Woodruff extension. In particular, this quote: "anyone who has watched the playoffs knows that for a team to make a legitimate run toward a World Series title, they have to have at least two, and preferably three or four top starting pitchers." While we have some really promising position players starting to emerge from our farm system, eventually to be headlined by Chourio, we remain short on high-impact arms, which as you state, are necessary for a "legitimate run" at a WS. Obviously, we have Peralta and Ashby locked up already, but what would really help is locking up one of our sure-fire, top 10 aces in Burnes and Woodruff to front a sustained World Series push over the next 5-6 years. Woodruff, for obvious reasons, is the most likely candidate, and the deal you propose is eminently reasonable for both player and club. Then, you can trade Burnes to obtain your next generation of superstar pitchers (i.e., Rodriguez, Espino, Tiedemann, Miller, Stone, etc.). 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Giving Woodruff that much money PER YEAR and for four more years, in addition to next year? And Yelich gets his money. Just not seeing it. Attendance down. This conversation should happen in July or so and maybe not even tgen. Let’s see how 2023 goes first. Very uneasy giving any pitcher big money to his mid 30s.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Giving Woodruff that much money PER YEAR and for four more years, in addition to next year? And Yelich gets his money. Just not seeing it. Attendance down. This conversation should happen in July or so and maybe not even tgen. Let’s see how 2023 goes first. Very uneasy giving any pitcher big money to his mid 30s.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That seems like a very fair deal. Obviously I'd start a little lower(5/100, TO@30 5M buyout). Maybe with Reynaud's he's more inclined to sign a deal ensuring 9 figures right now. 

     

    I know it's not the topic, but I'd make a similar deal to Burnes, just tack on about 3M a year before turning to Woodruff(so 5/125, maybe some escalator options). 

    But...as that's not likely to happen, I'd be happy locking Woodruff up the next 5yrs...and I have no concerns about it being into his early 30s. I'm not really sure why that's such a big concern. He's a guy who's got a big frame, good mechanics, we haven't abused him, he's thrown ~1200IP the last 11 years. The injuries he's had have been minor(and oblique at one point, an ankle and then a disease that's apparently not a big concern when treated). 

    Of course with pitchers, the risk of injury comes with all of them, but I feel as good with Woodruff or Burnes as I would just about anyone else.

    As far as concerns about the salary, that's always going to be an issue with the Brewers, but revenue is going up and this will be a young team. And if you can't sign either(or Willy) then that's fine too. It's not like a QB or a franchise player in the NBA. 

    We'll reload, hopefully keep developing pitchers after turning Burnes/Woody/Adames into some elite prospects. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That seems like a very fair deal. Obviously I'd start a little lower(5/100, TO@30 5M buyout). Maybe with Reynaud's he's more inclined to sign a deal ensuring 9 figures right now. 

     

    I know it's not the topic, but I'd make a similar deal to Burnes, just tack on about 3M a year before turning to Woodruff(so 5/125, maybe some escalator options). 

    But...as that's not likely to happen, I'd be happy locking Woodruff up the next 5yrs...and I have no concerns about it being into his early 30s. I'm not really sure why that's such a big concern. He's a guy who's got a big frame, good mechanics, we haven't abused him, he's thrown ~1200IP the last 11 years. The injuries he's had have been minor(and oblique at one point, an ankle and then a disease that's apparently not a big concern when treated). 

    Of course with pitchers, the risk of injury comes with all of them, but I feel as good with Woodruff or Burnes as I would just about anyone else.

    As far as concerns about the salary, that's always going to be an issue with the Brewers, but revenue is going up and this will be a young team. And if you can't sign either(or Willy) then that's fine too. It's not like a QB or a franchise player in the NBA. 

    We'll reload, hopefully keep developing pitchers after turning Burnes/Woody/Adames into some elite prospects. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...