Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Three Bad Decisions Sunk the Brewers' Playoff Run


    Tim Muma

    Countless decisions go into a Major League offseason, and even more occur once Opening Day commences. For the Milwaukee Brewers, three costly decisions played the most significant role in their failure to reach the playoffs in 2022.

    Image courtesy of © Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

    Brewers Video

     

    Sometimes sound judgments are made, but things don't work out. It happens on a small scale game during games (such as when to bring in a certain reliever) and on a larger scale with personnel decisions. Other times, people make foolish choices. It appears both types consistently burned the 2022 Brewers throughout the season.

    Regardless, MLB is a results-oriented business, so no moral victories exist. Three of the calls and outcomes that didn't go the Brewers' way had the greatest impact on a disappointing season that ended short of the playoffs.

    ANDREW MCCUTCHEN FREE AGENT SIGNING

    It has often been said that a one-year contract carries no risk. That isn't entirely true, especially when a team like the Brewers apparently have a limited budget. Signing Andrew McCutchen to a one-year, $8.5 million didn't break the bank, but it did burn Milwaukee. 

    As the one major free agent move, the Brewers made, relying on a 35-year-old to repeat his 2021 performance was fool's gold. Therein laid the risk, counting on an aging veteran with no complementary move to cover a potential slide - which is what happened. McCutchen murdered lefties in 2021, then fell flat on his face against southpaws with the Brewers.

    McCutchen vs LHP.JPG

    You can see why David Stearns was intrigued, but it turned out to be a harmful move. It's almost hard to believe how far McCutchen's numbers dipped against left-handers. Was it bad luck? Was it predictable that Cutch wouldn't come close to matching his huge season versus lefties at age 35? Perhaps the problem was manager Craig Counsell using McCutchen too often against righties. While McCutchen's numbers improved slightly versus righties, Counsell gave him 35 more plate appearances (and counting) this year after two sub-.700 OPS in the past couple of years. That may have worn him down unnecessarily and hurt his performance against lefties.

    Technically, the Brewers' offense was statistically better this season, but they were frustratingly inconsistent and benefited from a DH in 2022. With McCutchen in the DH role for more than 60% of his plate appearances, he wasn't close to good enough. Maybe it was telling no other MLB clubs went after him - at least at that price. Perhaps if the Brewers paid McCutchen only $5 million, they would have had some leftover funds for another player to impact the team positively.

    PLANNING TO RELY ON ETHAN SMALL

    Now the 12th-rated prospect in Milwaukee's system, the Brewers thought Small was ready to contribute to the big league club in 2022. Counsell expressed in Spring Training that the 25-year-old hurler earned time with the Brewers.

     

     

    Small made exactly two starts with Milwaukee: 6.1 IP, five earned runs (7.11 ERA), seven strikeouts, eight walks, and a 2.526 WHIP. In a season that saw 18 fewer starts from Brandon Woodruff, Freddy Peralta, and Adrian Houser due to injuries, Milwaukee needed another quality arm to step up. Small was supposed to be that guy.

    One problem was that Stearns and company didn't plan a fail-safe. In past seasons, they signed guys like Brett Anderson, who could at least offer a reliable amount of average outings to keep the team in games. Instead, unknown Jason Alexander took the hill for 11 starts. He owned a 4.82 ERA in those starts but had a fair amount of blowup games that not only put the Brewers behind but caused them to burn through bullpen arms.

    It was a double whammy. On the one hand, the Brewers misevaluated Small, whose lack of command grew worse in 2022 (5.1 walks per nine innings). On the other hand, Milwaukee had no other young pitchers or veteran hurlers ready to take the ball when injuries predictably struck. That significantly impacted Milwaukee's decline in run prevention and the tax on the bullpen that imploded in the second half.

    TRADE DEADLINE DEALS AND NO DEALS

    I'm not here to blame all things on the trading of Josh Hader. It certainly took an emotional and mental toll on the club for a while after the move, but it was not the only problem with the Brewers' trade deadline. Milwaukee also struggled before August 2, but they had won six of eight games leading up to the trade to hold a three-game lead in the NL Central. The events at the trade deadline move them backward instead.

    Hader was a hot mess before the shocking deal with the San Diego Padres and struggled initially in his new threads, but lately, his luck has turned. In his last 10 outings (9.1 innings), Hader has 13 strikeouts and one walk while giving up zero earned runs on four hits. Whatever he was going through, he has figured it out just in time to push San Diego to the playoffs and give them confidence in his arm in October.

    Meanwhile, Stearns' three acquisitions to "replace" Hader went in the wrong direction. Trevor Rosenthal got hurt (after recovering from another injury) and never pitched for the Brewers. Matt Bush came from the Texas Rangers with a 2.95 ERA and 1.2 HR/9, only to post a 4.30 ERA and 2.3 HR/9 in Milwaukee. The third piece, who came over in the Hader deal, was lefty Taylor Rogers. He had some issues in San Diego, but things got worse with the Brewers, producing a 5.73 ERA and 2.5 HR/9 (0.2 HR/9 with the Padres). Bush and Rogers were at the heart of Milwaukee's bullpen issues and homer-happy problems that gutted the Crew on far too many occasions during the season's final two months.

    As for the offense at the deadline, not one move was made. Despite an offense with positions needing an upgrade and a lineup that continued to struggle against left-handed pitching, Stearns failed to acquire even one bat. Yes, it takes two teams to tango, and the price for certain players may have been too high in Stearns' mind. That doesn't excuse failing to improve the lineup or depth, especially with an offense that relies on matchups. Plus, trading for a bat may have counteracted the Hader trade and showed the remaining players, "we're still going for it this season." We'll never know what another option in the lineup could have meant for the club, physically and mentally.

    And considering the decline in the starting rotation's overall performance - as well as the injuries that hampered them - it was negligent to fail to acquire some type of help there, either. There are always veteran pitchers with expiring contracts that could be had, including someone like the Brewers' favorite nemesis, Jose Quintana, who went to the St. Louis Cardinals instead. It was an overall failure to replace the club's lost production from 2021.

    It took a total team effort to miss out on one of six playoff spots in the NL. However, these three decisions had the most immense impact on the first non-playoff season since 2017 for the Milwaukee Brewers.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Brewer Fanatic wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM BREWER FANATIC
    — Latest Brewers coverage from our writers
    — Recent Brewers discussion in our forums
    — Follow Brewer Fanatic via Twitter, Facebook or email

     Share

    • Like 1
     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    56 minutes ago, Samurai Bucky said:

    I would add to that... struggles getting clutch hits with RISP.  On Monday, the only reason why Adames hit the ball to right in the latter part of the game is because the pitch was outside.

    With RISP (159 Games):

    • 21st in PA 
    • 26th in BAbip (.277)
    • 16th in RBI
    • 23rd in K% (26% -- worst is PIT at 30% and best is CLE at 21%; league average is 25%)
    • tOPS+ is 121 which may be saying that the Brewers did well, or their typical OPS+ is not very good.

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/tools/split_stats_lg.cgi?full=1&params=bases|RISP|ML|2022|bat|AB|

    People need to stop bringing up hitting with RISP, because that wasn't the problem. They hit .235 overall and .246 with RISP.  So they hit BETTER with RISP.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    People need to stop bringing up hitting with RISP, because that wasn't the problem. They hit .235 overall and .246 with RISP.  So they hit BETTER with RISP.

    People need to stop telling people what they're allowed to talk about on here. This is probably the...5th or 6th time you've said this about a perfectly reasonable topic.

    The average BA with RISP=.253
    The leave average BA=.243

    So...the Brewers were just as bad relative to the rest of the league with RISP as they were in BA. It most definitely WAS a problem. I don't think anyone's saying that was "THE" problem. There were multiple problems with this Brewers team. Their inability to add on runs or get runners from 2nd/3rd in with less than 2 outs, that was chief among them, PARTICULARLY the last month of the season. 

     

    And obviously BA goes up with RISP. Teams play their IFs in, the pressure is on the pitchers, they're more likely to not be able to shift(tough to play a 3B or SS a couple steps to the left of 2nd with a man on 3rd). 

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    People need to stop bringing up hitting with RISP, because that wasn't the problem. They hit .235 overall and .246 with RISP.  So they hit BETTER with RISP.

    People need to stop telling people what they're allowed to talk about on here. This is probably the...5th or 6th time you've said this about a perfectly reasonable topic.

    The average BA with RISP=.253
    The leave average BA=.243

    So...the Brewers were just as bad relative to the rest of the league with RISP as they were in BA. It most definitely WAS a problem. I don't think anyone's saying that was "THE" problem. There were multiple problems with this Brewers team. Their inability to add on runs or get runners from 2nd/3rd in with less than 2 outs, that was chief among them, PARTICULARLY the last month of the season. 

     

    And obviously BA goes up with RISP. Teams play their IFs in, the pressure is on the pitchers, they're more likely to not be able to shift(tough to play a 3B or SS a couple steps to the left of 2nd with a man on 3rd). 

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    People need to stop telling people what they're allowed to talk about on here. This is probably the...5th or 6th time you've said this about a perfectly reasonable topic.

    The average BA with RISP=.253
    The leave average BA=.243

    So...the Brewers were just as bad relative to the rest of the league with RISP as they were in BA. 

     

    And obviously BA goes up with RISP. Teams play their IFs in, the pressure is on the pitchers, they're more likely to not be able to shift(tough to play a 3B or SS a couple steps to the left of 2nd with a man on 3rd). 

     

     

    You're right. I'm going to keep pimping bringing back Ryan Braun as our savior at 3B because: FREEDOM! ?
    Did you see Sveum's post on the brewers hitting with RISP? It went beyond batting average and the Brewers look even better relative to other teams. What is a reasonable thing to say is the Brewers need to hit better*. Period, end of discussion. There is nothing about RISP that needs to be discussed.

    *Though really they didn't hit that badly relative to other teams.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    People need to stop telling people what they're allowed to talk about on here. This is probably the...5th or 6th time you've said this about a perfectly reasonable topic.

    The average BA with RISP=.253
    The leave average BA=.243

    So...the Brewers were just as bad relative to the rest of the league with RISP as they were in BA. 

     

    And obviously BA goes up with RISP. Teams play their IFs in, the pressure is on the pitchers, they're more likely to not be able to shift(tough to play a 3B or SS a couple steps to the left of 2nd with a man on 3rd). 

     

     

    You're right. I'm going to keep pimping bringing back Ryan Braun as our savior at 3B because: FREEDOM! ?
    Did you see Sveum's post on the brewers hitting with RISP? It went beyond batting average and the Brewers look even better relative to other teams. What is a reasonable thing to say is the Brewers need to hit better*. Period, end of discussion. There is nothing about RISP that needs to be discussed.

    *Though really they didn't hit that badly relative to other teams.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Robocaller said:

    You're right. I'm going to keep pimping bringing back Ryan Braun as our savior at 3B because: FREEDOM! ?
    Did you see Sveum's post on the brewers hitting with RISP? It went beyond batting average and the Brewers look even better relative to other teams. What is a reasonable thing to say is the Brewers need to hit better*. Period, end of discussion. There is nothing about RISP that needs to be discussed.

    *Though really they didn't hit that badly relative to other teams.

    Yeah...if the Braun thing was the ONLY issue I wouldn't have brought it up. Braun hasn't even been on the team for a couple years and literally ONE person ever thought that was a good idea. 

    Edit--Also, I DID say about a perfectly REASONABLE topic. Feel free to use it again the next time 25 year deferred payments of 10M a year to Corbin Burnes in order to sign him to an extension is brought up.

    And no, I did not see Svuem's post on the Brewers hitting with RISP. I saw him talk about a different issue with this team in this thread, but surely the point isn't that there was just ONE problem, right?
    This team was bad or below average in a WHOLE lot of areas. 

    How many times could we not get the run in on 2nd in extra innings? 

    Just the last two games of the Marlins series they were 2 for 20 I think...fighting for their playoff life they couldn't get a runner in from 2nd with 0 outs in extra innings. 

     

    This isn't a multiple choice. The Brewer are an all or nothing team. That may produce a decent OPS, but it doesn't produce consistency. Is this NOT the main cause for excitement about hitters like Frelick, Mitchell, Ruiz...because they can actually help us score different ways? Their athleticism, Ruiz's ability to get down a bunt, Frelick making contact, Mitchell...we've already seen what his speed can do to teams in games. 

     

    Oh...and they should DEFINITELY give Ruiz some games at 2B next year in ST'ing or AAA...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Robocaller said:

    You're right. I'm going to keep pimping bringing back Ryan Braun as our savior at 3B because: FREEDOM! ?
    Did you see Sveum's post on the brewers hitting with RISP? It went beyond batting average and the Brewers look even better relative to other teams. What is a reasonable thing to say is the Brewers need to hit better*. Period, end of discussion. There is nothing about RISP that needs to be discussed.

    *Though really they didn't hit that badly relative to other teams.

    Yeah...if the Braun thing was the ONLY issue I wouldn't have brought it up. Braun hasn't even been on the team for a couple years and literally ONE person ever thought that was a good idea. 

    Edit--Also, I DID say about a perfectly REASONABLE topic. Feel free to use it again the next time 25 year deferred payments of 10M a year to Corbin Burnes in order to sign him to an extension is brought up.

    And no, I did not see Svuem's post on the Brewers hitting with RISP. I saw him talk about a different issue with this team in this thread, but surely the point isn't that there was just ONE problem, right?
    This team was bad or below average in a WHOLE lot of areas. 

    How many times could we not get the run in on 2nd in extra innings? 

    Just the last two games of the Marlins series they were 2 for 20 I think...fighting for their playoff life they couldn't get a runner in from 2nd with 0 outs in extra innings. 

     

    This isn't a multiple choice. The Brewer are an all or nothing team. That may produce a decent OPS, but it doesn't produce consistency. Is this NOT the main cause for excitement about hitters like Frelick, Mitchell, Ruiz...because they can actually help us score different ways? Their athleticism, Ruiz's ability to get down a bunt, Frelick making contact, Mitchell...we've already seen what his speed can do to teams in games. 

     

    Oh...and they should DEFINITELY give Ruiz some games at 2B next year in ST'ing or AAA...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, UpandIn said:

     

    Edit--Also, I DID say about a perfectly REASONABLE topic.

    we differ about what's reasonable. I don't think it's reasonable to complain about how the brewers are bad at something after it's proven they aren't. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, UpandIn said:

     

    Edit--Also, I DID say about a perfectly REASONABLE topic.

    we differ about what's reasonable. I don't think it's reasonable to complain about how the brewers are bad at something after it's proven they aren't. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    we differ about what's reasonable. I don't think it's reasonable to complain about how the brewers are bad at something after it's proven they aren't. 

    Apparently we also differ about the word proven. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    we differ about what's reasonable. I don't think it's reasonable to complain about how the brewers are bad at something after it's proven they aren't. 

    Apparently we also differ about the word proven. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Robocaller said:

    People need to stop bringing up hitting with RISP, because that wasn't the problem. They hit .235 overall and .246 with RISP.  So they hit BETTER with RISP.

    So we are OK with them hitting .246?  Your point of them hitting .235 overall is also reflected in the fact that they were one of the worst teams in getting RISP to begin with.

    I also think that you are reiterating this point:

    • tOPS+ is 121 which may be saying that the Brewers did well, or their typical OPS+ is not very good.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Robocaller said:

    People need to stop bringing up hitting with RISP, because that wasn't the problem. They hit .235 overall and .246 with RISP.  So they hit BETTER with RISP.

    So we are OK with them hitting .246?  Your point of them hitting .235 overall is also reflected in the fact that they were one of the worst teams in getting RISP to begin with.

    I also think that you are reiterating this point:

    • tOPS+ is 121 which may be saying that the Brewers did well, or their typical OPS+ is not very good.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, Robocaller said:

    People need to stop bringing up hitting with RISP, because that wasn't the problem. They hit .235 overall and .246 with RISP.  So they hit BETTER with RISP.

    Well it's never a "THE" problem.  It's often "A"/"one" problem.  Their hitting with RISP is below average, but not significantly lower that it is a Major Issue.  There are probably 5 to 6 other problems with a larger impact so it is relatively low on the list.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, Robocaller said:

    People need to stop bringing up hitting with RISP, because that wasn't the problem. They hit .235 overall and .246 with RISP.  So they hit BETTER with RISP.

    Well it's never a "THE" problem.  It's often "A"/"one" problem.  Their hitting with RISP is below average, but not significantly lower that it is a Major Issue.  There are probably 5 to 6 other problems with a larger impact so it is relatively low on the list.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Let's think about this. I know it seems that hitting with RISP is hugely important, and it is. And it's uncontrollable, except by one way: replace bad hitters with good hitters, irrespective of the situation. Refer to Sveumrules post (in a different thread?).

    1) The Brewers did not hit badly with RISP compared to how they hit overall. In fact they hit better.

    2) The Brewers did not hit badly with RISP compared to other teams. In fact they did better than most teams.

    3) Hitting with RISP (relative to all situations) is mostly a random event; few players are consistently bad or consistently good from year to year (and probability suggests that there should be a small number of such "lucky" and "unlucky" players) . 

    4) Saying, "We need to improve our hitting with RISP," is like a Craps player saying, "I need to roll more sevens."

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Let's think about this. I know it seems that hitting with RISP is hugely important, and it is. And it's uncontrollable, except by one way: replace bad hitters with good hitters, irrespective of the situation. Refer to Sveumrules post (in a different thread?).

    1) The Brewers did not hit badly with RISP compared to how they hit overall. In fact they hit better.

    2) The Brewers did not hit badly with RISP compared to other teams. In fact they did better than most teams.

    3) Hitting with RISP (relative to all situations) is mostly a random event; few players are consistently bad or consistently good from year to year (and probability suggests that there should be a small number of such "lucky" and "unlucky" players) . 

    4) Saying, "We need to improve our hitting with RISP," is like a Craps player saying, "I need to roll more sevens."

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Robocaller said:

    1) The Brewers did not hit badly with RISP compared to how they hit overall. In fact they hit better.

    Yes, but not relative to the rest of the league. 
    The AVERAGE BA with RISP was ~10 points higher. So they were just as bad relative to the rest of the league at getting hits with RISP as they were getting hits to begin with. 

    2 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    2) The Brewers did not hit badly with RISP compared to other teams. In fact they did better than most teams.

    Not their batting average...which was the statistic both you and Svuem cited. 

    They were well below league average. .246, league AVERAGE .253.
    That's not better than most teams.

    6 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

     

    4) Saying, "We need to improve our hitting with RISP," is like a Craps player saying, "I need to roll more sevens."

    Ok....? 

    The point was made that we struggled hitting with RISP. You said "people need to stop saying that," beacuse their BA was higher with RISP than it was on balance. And again, it is for all of Baseball. There are a myriad of reasons why it's easier to get a hit with RISP...in no small part to IF positioning. They'll often play their IF in, or they can't shift with a runner on 2nd. The pitcher is more apt to give in to a hitter so as to not put another runner on. 

    WHATEVER it is, we were below average in the league in BA AND BA with RISP and the comment wasn't made "we need to improve our hitting with RISP," it was simply pointed out...that was a problem.

    It's also nothing like saying "I Need to roll more sevens." It's more like saying, "we need hitters who can shorten up, put the ball in play, and particularly with less than 2 outs, get runners over and in."

     

    Kolten Wong himself talked about how he liked how in Milwaukee, they didn't ask you to shorten up with 2 strikes...and that's obviously an organizational philosophy because...we were 26th in K rate?

     

    There's a reason you want power pitchers with the Manfred runner on 2nd base. Because a strikeout is huge and can help you get out of the innings...or just help you get out of trouble anytime you're dealing with runners in scoring position and fewer than 2 outs. We were 26th in that category. That's just bad baseball.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Robocaller said:

    1) The Brewers did not hit badly with RISP compared to how they hit overall. In fact they hit better.

    Yes, but not relative to the rest of the league. 
    The AVERAGE BA with RISP was ~10 points higher. So they were just as bad relative to the rest of the league at getting hits with RISP as they were getting hits to begin with. 

    2 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    2) The Brewers did not hit badly with RISP compared to other teams. In fact they did better than most teams.

    Not their batting average...which was the statistic both you and Svuem cited. 

    They were well below league average. .246, league AVERAGE .253.
    That's not better than most teams.

    6 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

     

    4) Saying, "We need to improve our hitting with RISP," is like a Craps player saying, "I need to roll more sevens."

    Ok....? 

    The point was made that we struggled hitting with RISP. You said "people need to stop saying that," beacuse their BA was higher with RISP than it was on balance. And again, it is for all of Baseball. There are a myriad of reasons why it's easier to get a hit with RISP...in no small part to IF positioning. They'll often play their IF in, or they can't shift with a runner on 2nd. The pitcher is more apt to give in to a hitter so as to not put another runner on. 

    WHATEVER it is, we were below average in the league in BA AND BA with RISP and the comment wasn't made "we need to improve our hitting with RISP," it was simply pointed out...that was a problem.

    It's also nothing like saying "I Need to roll more sevens." It's more like saying, "we need hitters who can shorten up, put the ball in play, and particularly with less than 2 outs, get runners over and in."

     

    Kolten Wong himself talked about how he liked how in Milwaukee, they didn't ask you to shorten up with 2 strikes...and that's obviously an organizational philosophy because...we were 26th in K rate?

     

    There's a reason you want power pitchers with the Manfred runner on 2nd base. Because a strikeout is huge and can help you get out of the innings...or just help you get out of trouble anytime you're dealing with runners in scoring position and fewer than 2 outs. We were 26th in that category. That's just bad baseball.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

     

    They were well below league average. .246, league AVERAGE .253.
    That's not better than most teams.  

    You really need to look at Sveumrules' post.

    7 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    It's also nothing like saying "I Need to roll more sevens." It's more like saying, "we need hitters who can shorten up, put the ball in play, and particularly with less than 2 outs, get runners over and in."

    For most hitters, attempting to do so leads to worse results. Analytics has changed the way batters hit. Turning back the clock will result in worse production.

    But yeah, I'd like to roll a 7 too.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

     

    They were well below league average. .246, league AVERAGE .253.
    That's not better than most teams.  

    You really need to look at Sveumrules' post.

    7 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    It's also nothing like saying "I Need to roll more sevens." It's more like saying, "we need hitters who can shorten up, put the ball in play, and particularly with less than 2 outs, get runners over and in."

    For most hitters, attempting to do so leads to worse results. Analytics has changed the way batters hit. Turning back the clock will result in worse production.

    But yeah, I'd like to roll a 7 too.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Robocaller said:

    You really need to look at Sveumrules' post.

    Again, I really did. However as it had nothing to do with our struggles with RISP, it's not relevant to this. More than one thing can in fact go wrong during a season.

    4 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    For most hitters, attempting to do so leads to worse results. Analytics has changed the way batters hit. Turning back the clock will result in worse production.

    But yeah, I'd like to roll a 7 too.

    Really? Trying to make contact with RISP and shortening up leads to worse results for "most hitters?"

    I'd like to see anything that supports that. 

    BABIP with RISP is higher than BA overall. 

    So...seems like a difficult argument to make that making contact with runners in scoring position vs striking out would lead to worse results. 

    But yeah, I'd rather not talk about shooting craps when talking Baseball. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Robocaller said:

    You really need to look at Sveumrules' post.

    Again, I really did. However as it had nothing to do with our struggles with RISP, it's not relevant to this. More than one thing can in fact go wrong during a season.

    4 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    For most hitters, attempting to do so leads to worse results. Analytics has changed the way batters hit. Turning back the clock will result in worse production.

    But yeah, I'd like to roll a 7 too.

    Really? Trying to make contact with RISP and shortening up leads to worse results for "most hitters?"

    I'd like to see anything that supports that. 

    BABIP with RISP is higher than BA overall. 

    So...seems like a difficult argument to make that making contact with runners in scoring position vs striking out would lead to worse results. 

    But yeah, I'd rather not talk about shooting craps when talking Baseball. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...