Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • The Weekly Dispatch: A Rule of Thirds


    Brent Sirvio

    The 2022 MLB season met its first checkpoint just after Memorial Day and, against all odds or cursory glances, the weathered, well-traveled Milwaukee Brewers sat atop the National League Central. As history is wont to do, it provides us a glimpse into the future. Or does it?

    Image courtesy of © Jeff Hanisch-USA TODAY Sports

    Brewers Video

    You'll note that the column's title has changed. I couldn't think of anything better when I first started here, so I settled on The Weekly. Of course, that is the name of the weekly news magazine produced by The New York Times. They are under no threat of infringement at the hands of a small-fry Brewers blogger, but even small-fry Brewers bloggers are capable of a reasonable sense of professionalism and self-respect. Having said that, The Weekly Dispatch is a column on the Brewers. 'On' may do heavier lifting on some weeks than others.

    After two months of season, one begins to get their first real sense of what a team is. There's enough sample size to the statistics provide context, and a historical plumbline by which the balance of the season may be measured.

    It is true that the Milwaukee Brewers are off to their finest start in club history, which is tempered some by the fact that Brewers club history isn't exactly sterling, and that we fans in 2022 exist alongside the best chapter in franchise history. Despite cruel and unusual scheduling -- though not fully included below, the Brewers as of composition time are winding down a particularly brutal stretch of 18 games in 17 consecutive days -- a spat of injuries that make less of an injury bug than a full-on, Exodus 10-grade plague of locusts, and some abysmal hitting for contact while also leading the league in home runs, the Brewers are living and dying by three true outcomes.

    Here is some historical context, so that Brewers fans might have a sense for what the team has accomplished, and what lies ahead. Teams in the wild card era [excluding 2020] that have played at least 51 games with 1900 plate appearances, with at least 350 hits, 430 strikeouts, 220 runs scored, 60 home runs and an OPS of at least .700:

    Results Table
    Rk Team W L Rank Postseason PA AB RS RA H 2B 3B HR RBI BA OBP SLG OPS BB IBB SO HBP SH SF ROE GDP SB CS
    1 NYY 34 17 1 Division Champ 1946 1714 273 207 440 75 4 81 255 .257 .335 .447 .782 189 7 439 20 8 15 20 43 26 5
    4 NYY 33 18 2 Wildcard 2004 1751 288 221 445 101 7 84 279 .254 .337 .464 .801 211 8 456 18 5 19 21 28 23 5
    5 MIL 32 19 1   1900 1690 235 196 395 73 7 70 227 .234 .311 .410 .720 172 3 451 23 1 14 15 35 31 12
    6 TBR 32 19 2 Wildcard 1979 1762 234 162 453 97 13 67 224 .257 .333 .441 .774 179 7 493 25 3 10 19 45 34 10
    7 COL 32 19 3 Wildcard 1936 1747 259 218 466 92 11 66 249 .267 .324 .445 .769 138 7 441 16 23 12 20 34 12 11
    8 BOS 31 20 2 Wildcard 1900 1723 264 212 448 110 4 68 244 .260 .322 .447 .769 140 7 449 22 2 12 20 37 22 5
    9 LAD 31 20 2 Wildcard 2011 1727 263 189 420 77 11 62 252 .243 .342 .408 .750 228 17 466 36 10 10 13 32 16 5
    10 SFG 31 20 1 Division Champ 1901 1664 239 181 377 72 7 71 226 .227 .314 .406 .720 199 11 499 16 13 8 22 42 21 6
    11 TBR 31 20 1 Division Champ 1983 1748 252 202 404 97 5 62 238 .231 .317 .399 .716 197 7 539 26 4 7 20 23 28 13
    12 ARI 31 20 2 Wildcard 1945 1756 253 198 462 92 13 71 238 .263 .330 .452 .782 165 15 450 13 7 4 16 29 48 12
    13 NYY 31 20 2 Wildcard 2024 1783 280 214 478 81 6 78 265 .268 .346 .452 .797 201 2 459 17 7 13 29 42 32 9
    14 ATL 31 20 1 Division Champ 1936 1710 229 184 421 77 6 70 221 .246 .321 .421 .742 177 5 467 16 21 11 23 37 16 12
    16 CHC 30 21 3   2028 1749 275 221 452 89 7 82 264 .258 .349 .458 .807 221 16 458 30 12 16 16 41 13 9
    17 CHC 29 22 4   1921 1676 237 206 404 71 9 62 228 .241 .324 .405 .729 180 8 482 33 14 17 16 33 31 12
    18 MIL 29 22 2 Wildcard 1995 1751 250 237 435 74 2 81 246 .248 .333 .432 .765 204 18 492 23 2 11 12 47 30 10
    19 BAL 29 22 2 Wildcard 1924 1738 231 219 450 99 3 69 219 .259 .324 .438 .762 164 9 435 9 1 12 14 41 8 6
    20 BAL 29 22 2 Wildcard 1960 1765 230 222 439 89 7 75 213 .249 .314 .435 .749 154 4 430 20 8 12 13 54 20 15
    21 SFG 28 23 3   1966 1725 264 237 424 86 3 64 252 .246 .327 .410 .737 193 3 432 25 0 23 14 38 21 8
    22 LAA 27 24 2   1911 1710 237 208 426 78 6 68 228 .249 .321 .421 .742 169 8 467 15 10 7 12 35 30 13
    23 BAL 27 24 5   1967 1801 229 234 457 85 3 69 217 .254 .311 .419 .730 140 3 456 14 2 10 23 34 12 4
    24 MIL 27 24 2   1932 1735 259 236 441 95 11 72 249 .254 .325 .446 .771 165 8 471 17 12 3 16 33 42 17
    25 CLE 27 24 2 Wildcard 1964 1756 252 233 460 105 10 65 241 .262 .329 .444 .774 169 6 432 16 6 17 14 33 38 10
    26 MIL 27 24 4   1918 1698 263 211 438 78 11 71 253 .258 .328 .442 .770 163 22 440 20 25 12 13 27 15 17
    27 ARI 26 25 2   2016 1813 264 225 465 112 11 73 252 .257 .323 .451 .774 156 8 462 26 9 11 11 36 25 3
    28 CLE 26 25 1 Division Champ 1996 1794 247 231 445 96 4 75 240 .248 .318 .431 .749 168 8 438 19 7 7 11 25 27 12
    29 OAK 26 25 2 Wildcard 1956 1755 229 236 430 99 7 62 220 .245 .315 .415 .731 165 2 460 21 2 13 14 38 11 10
    30 TBR 26 25 3   1960 1728 232 206 425 75 10 71 223 .246 .326 .424 .751 197 12 529 15 7 12 13 33 23 8
    31 ATL 25 26 1 WS Champ 1901 1668 248 248 391 79 7 81 240 .234 .316 .436 .752 178 15 476 28 12 15 11 31 14 6
    32 NYM 25 26 3   1982 1757 235 248 426 83 6 64 227 .243 .321 .406 .727 179 12 485 29 9 8 14 38 17 9
    33 TEX 25 26 3   1975 1745 285 276 441 106 9 80 275 .253 .333 .461 .794 192 6 500 22 6 8 22 36 37 12
    34 CHC 25 26 1 Division Champ 2013 1757 239 238 416 80 12 66 222 .237 .325 .409 .734 206 18 445 29 12 9 25 40 15 8
    35 CIN 25 26 5   1964 1730 259 318 437 72 8 78 246 .253 .330 .439 .768 181 11 437 23 20 10 18 29 30 14
    Rk Team W L Rank Postseason PA AB RS RA H 2B 3B HR RBI BA OBP SLG OPS BB IBB SO HBP SH SF ROE GDP SB CS
    36 COL 24 27 4   1998 1798 269 275 461 107 20 68 261 .256 .317 .452 .768 152 7 495 14 19 15 16 25 16 13
    37 TOR 24 27 4   1941 1724 240 254 398 102 7 66 225 .231 .310 .413 .723 184 8 460 20 1 12 25 31 21 6
    38 DET 24 27 5   1944 1714 239 260 414 85 11 60 228 .242 .327 .409 .736 203 10 448 16 5 6 24 41 14 14
    39 DET 24 27 2   1910 1746 230 249 456 80 11 67 222 .261 .318 .435 .753 139 8 442 11 3 11 16 33 16 9
    40 CIN 23 28 3   1956 1733 245 271 425 81 4 71 232 .245 .322 .420 .741 168 3 454 33 9 13 15 42 12 11
    41 SEA 23 28 5   1976 1751 270 307 426 90 5 93 265 .243 .319 .460 .779 183 1 502 20 2 19 13 19 31 11
    43 MIN 21 30 5   1922 1707 240 259 412 92 5 70 225 .241 .316 .424 .740 173 4 446 21 2 17 13 31 16 3
    44 WSN 20 31 2 WS Champ 1939 1725 231 269 424 81 4 67 218 .246 .319 .414 .733 166 8 484 24 14 10 18 35 30 9
    45 ARI 20 31 5   1957 1729 253 316 440 111 8 60 246 .255 .333 .432 .765 199 12 468 9 9 11 12 38 28 8
    Provided by Stathead.com: View Stathead Tool Used Generated 6/4/2022.

     

    That's 41 teams, and only about half of them made it to October. The best statistical corollary to what the Brewers have done thus far is a few rows below their current campaign: last year's San Francisco Giants, who eked out the NL West on a hot final third of the season and were dismissed from the October proceedings at the hands of their ancient, transcontinental enemies in the Dodgers.

    What's also notable about this list is that it is in no way a determinant of success: there are the 2003 Cincinnati Reds, who hammered the ball to roughly a .500 record and finished the season 69-93. There are also the 2017 Chicago Cubs, who were similarly around .500 and went on to win the division in 2017. Only two clubs, as you can see, won the whole dang thing. 

    The Brewers have done this offensive work before, in 2001, 2017 and 2019, with Richie Sexson, Jeromy Burnitz, Jose Hernandez and Geoff Jenkins swinging away toward a 68-94 record in '01. That 2017 club that came one heartbreaking game shy of playing postseason ball. And 2019, similarly hopeful, similarly heartbreaking, except that the broken heart came when Josh Hader was extraordinarily human (Remember when he wasn't destroying batters every night?) and Trent Grisham made the error that would, in time, give the Brewers Luis Urias and Eric Lauer.

    The other story here in the midst of all this offensive data is that it takes really good pitching to make offense count; that's what the Brewers have done thus far, and how the 2019 Washington Nationals and 2021 Atlanta Braves similarly 1) drove the Brewers out of October and 2) beat the Houston Astros to win it all. It's not a well-substantiated blueprint for success, but a [recent] blueprint nonetheless.

    There are still reasons to be bullish on this Brewers squad: The disproportionately road-heavy schedule now is complemented by a much more palatable second half featuring five of six series at home to close the season and zero three-city road trips. It won't necessarily be an easier schedule, but it's nothing compared to the logistical meat grinder the Brewers have been thrown into here in the front half of the season. The defense (and offense) will soon be bolstered by the return of Willy Adames and Hunter Renfroe. Three teams in the Central are not actively trying to win and the Brewers have 35 games against them the rest of the way; the Brewers have been fairly effective in 2022 at taking care of business against beatable opponents.

    There are also reasons to be concerned: as mentioned above, performance now is no indicator of future success. Some teams go on to the postseason, some flame out, most that do make it don't win pennants and none of these teams that played October ball had an OBP at the end of May as low as the 2022 Brewers. There are the soft tissue injuries (Adames, Brosseau, Renfroe, Urias) that seldom entirely resolve as a season grinds on. Christian Yelich surfaced for a moment and is mired again, now in a 3-29 slump entering Saturday, while batting nearly 100 points beneath his weight and OBP is not far over it.

    What if the bats come back to life? What if the pitching falters? What if the defensive yips up and down the roster continue? What if the team is plagued by more injuries? What if the Stearns-Arnold administration makes a move? The sense we get of this Brewers club is that there isn't much sense we can make of this club.

    And that kind of uncertainty engenders a disquiet amongst fans and followers that understandably leads to skepticism and doubt. What complicates this skepticism is that the Brewers have been postseason players for three years now with nothing to show for it but excruciating losses. At some point, people grow numb to a team that wins enough to lose when it really counts.

    Our rule of thirds here is that there are two-thirds of a season that can swing this club wildly in any direction. The Brewers are in a mix of contenders and cellar-dwellars and could as easily follow two of the last three World Series champions as they could those 2003 Reds, or, far more unlikely, their 2001 forebears. It's quite literally all in play.

     

    Think you could write a story like this? Brewer Fanatic wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM BREWER FANATIC
    — Latest Brewers coverage from our writers
    — Recent Brewers discussion in our forums
    — Follow Brewer Fanatic via Twitter, Facebook or email

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...