Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic
  • Is Now the Right Time to Trade Corbin Burnes?


    Tim Muma

    It is rare to willingly get rid of one of the most dominant pitchers in MLB, who also won a Cy Young Award two seasons ago. However, the Milwaukee Brewers have to consider the option of trading Corbin Burnes now to maximize the return package of talent, especially if they aren't going to offer the right-hander a long-term contract.

    Image courtesy of © MARK HOFFMAN/MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL / USA TODAY NETWORK

    Brewers Video

     

    GM Matt Arnold will have some tough decisions in the coming months and years, but nothing is more significant than determining how to handle Corbin Burnes' time with the Milwaukee Brewers. That could also be affected by what the Brewers decide to do with Brandon Woodruff. It isn't easy to see them keeping both or offering long-term deals before they become free agents in two seasons. Could they trade both? That would be a gamble, too. But let's look squarely at Burnes and his trade candidacy.

    The 2021 NL Cy Young has been phenomenal since the start of the 2020 season, which means a big payday is on the horizon. Some people need to appreciate how ridiculous Burnes has been in the last three years and how it will impact his salary.

    Corbin Burnes ranks first among MLB starters in these categories since 2020:

    • 2.60 ERA
    • 2.36 FIP
    • 0.96 WHIP
    • 11.83 K/9
    • 33.3 K% 
    • 27.1 K-BB%
    • 7.86 WPA (Win Probability Added)
    • 14.3 fWAR (FanGraphs' Wins Above Replacement)

    Burnes makes a strong case for being the best pitcher in baseball right now. With two years of arbitration remaining, he would become a free agent after the 2024 season if he doesn't sign a contract extension. Those numbers for a starter who would hit free agency at 30 with mostly good health could generate a record contract. Burnes also tossed more than 200 innings last season while leading the NL with 243 strikeouts, meaning he isn't likely to decline soon. A quick look at recent starting pitcher contracts could legitimately net Burnes a contract for anywhere between five and eight years from $175-$275 million if a big market team is determined to land him. Check out the list below from Spotrac.com and you can see the huge deals for recent starting pitchers. 

    Spotrac.com


    Realistically, the Brewers are unlikely to invest that much in one player, especially with the way the Christian Yelich deal has gone thus far. Pitchers also carry more injury risk. If the organization doesn't want to lose Burnes to free agency without getting anything in return, this offseason could net them the most crucial haul for future success. The question is, can you get fair value back in a trade?

    For the Brewers to jettison Burnes elsewhere, they need at least a couple of players at the beginning of their MLB careers or on the cusp. Getting two players back who are under team control for five or six years and are ready to contribute now is essential to keep the club from dipping in performance. Then Milwaukee would need a couple of higher-level prospects with significant potential. Ideally, they're getting at least two starting pitchers in the deal and one impact bat. People might argue the return should include a top-20 MLB prospect and three more of the team's best 10 minor leaguers, but that can be subjective.

    It's going to come down to the right fit for a club that lacks top-tier starting pitching and has the means to sign Burns to a long-term contract. It would help if you also had a team that feels comfortable offensively or is willing to add offense via free agency. They would then feel good about swapping out a solid bat (and the other pieces) for a true ace that puts them over the top. The first two clubs that come to mind as examples are the Texas Rangers and Baltimore Orioles. Both teams want to push their franchises forward, and their farm systems were ranked sixth and first this past August.

    Texas has already shown a willingness to pay big bucks by giving Corey Seager and Marcus Semien mega-deals last offseason. The Rangers have six prospects in MLB Pipeline's top 100, including third baseman Josh Jung (#36) and right-handed pitchers Jack Leiter (#45), Owen White (#59), and Brock Porter (#89). Getting Jung and two of those hurlers gets them in the ballpark, then you figure out the fourth player. Texas finished fifth in runs scored (4.36 R/G) in the AL last season but 12th in ERA (4.22), so they would make a considerable jump up with Burnes. Rangers' fans in September were already pining for a rotation with Burnes at the top.

    As for the Orioles, they were only 10th in the AL in runs scored (4.16), although they would have an entire season of catcher Adley Rutschman and shortstop Gunnar Henderson to increase production in 2023 and beyond. Baltimore also has money to burn in free agency to acquire a big hitter for the middle of its lineup. Meanwhile, the O's 3.97 ERA ranked ninth in the AL; however, they had a 4.35 starting pitching ERA. They could use a stud arm up front to lead their young hurlers.

    Baltimore also has six of MLB's top-100 prospects, though Henderson (#2), right-handed pitcher Grayson Rodriguez (#4), and this year's number one overall draft pick, Jackson Holliday, are probably off limits. That leaves outfielder Colton Cowser (#40), infielder Jordan Westburg (#76), and left-handed pitcher DL Hall (#87) in play. Of course, Baltimore could also entice the Brewers with a Major Leaguer. Could outfielders Cedric Mullins or Anthony Santander be moved to acquire a starter like Burnes? It's possible because of the Orioles loaded farm system and available cash.

    No matter who the Brewers get in return for a potential Burnes trade, many in the fanbase will be upset - and there's nothing wrong with that. Unfortunately, moving a player of Burnes' caliber at the right time for the best collection of young talent possible is often the ideal long-term option for continued, sustainable success.

    The most intriguing question around a Burnes trade might be, when is the best time to make it happen? Should the Brewers see how 2023 starts and trade him at the mid-season deadline if the club is floundering? It gives you another shot at the playoffs with your two aces (assuming Woodruff is still with the club). Do you wait until next offseason when he has just one year left on the contract and has slightly less value? You also risk injury or ineffectiveness curtailing his worth. That potential for injury and a possible dip in value is why many believe that if the Milwaukee Brewers are going to trade Corbin Burnes, this offseason is the time to strike. What do you think about dealing Burnes away, and who should they try to get back?

    Think you could write a story like this? Brewer Fanatic wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM BREWER FANATIC
    — Latest Brewers coverage from our writers
    — Recent Brewers discussion in our forums
    — Follow Brewer Fanatic via Twitter, Facebook or email

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 minutes ago, Team Canada said:

    Stop being unnecessarily confrontational and condescending.

    You realize it was a response to something confrontational and condescending, right?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Team Canada said:

    Stop being unnecessarily confrontational and condescending.

    You realize it was a response to something confrontational and condescending, right?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tim Muma
  • Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posted

    12 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    Burnes' CY was announced LESS than ONE year ago. So you're just wrong. It is great that you're so brave to make a big deal out of this. There is a mathematical convention for the "timing of things during a year," and your belief is not consistent with that. So, admit your mistake and move on. Be a better man.

     

     

    I am sorry, but you made a mocking statement about it ("the author thinks...), but I am making a big deal about it? I just responded to you.

    And for the record, that is why I said he won it 2 SEASONS ago, not years. Again, I view the 2022 Brewers' SEASON over.

    Also, to say "Be a better man" is quite condescending as well. I'm all good, man. I hope everything is ok with you to feel the need to go there 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Tim Muma
  • Brewer Fanatic Contributor
  • Posted

    12 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    Burnes' CY was announced LESS than ONE year ago. So you're just wrong. It is great that you're so brave to make a big deal out of this. There is a mathematical convention for the "timing of things during a year," and your belief is not consistent with that. So, admit your mistake and move on. Be a better man.

     

     

    I am sorry, but you made a mocking statement about it ("the author thinks...), but I am making a big deal about it? I just responded to you.

    And for the record, that is why I said he won it 2 SEASONS ago, not years. Again, I view the 2022 Brewers' SEASON over.

    Also, to say "Be a better man" is quite condescending as well. I'm all good, man. I hope everything is ok with you to feel the need to go there 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, UpandIn said:

    Gerrit Cole's deal is one deal and an aberration.

    It's not. Maybe Burnes doesn't get a nine year deal but if he enters free agency healthy, he's looking at a $300m deal easily.

    MLB contracts only escalate. Corbin Burnes is the best pitcher in baseball. If he enters free agency, or even comes close to it, he will receive a $300m deal.

    Do you think the Dodgers or Mets care if he's worth $40m in 2030?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, UpandIn said:

    Gerrit Cole's deal is one deal and an aberration.

    It's not. Maybe Burnes doesn't get a nine year deal but if he enters free agency healthy, he's looking at a $300m deal easily.

    MLB contracts only escalate. Corbin Burnes is the best pitcher in baseball. If he enters free agency, or even comes close to it, he will receive a $300m deal.

    Do you think the Dodgers or Mets care if he's worth $40m in 2030?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    The point is that inaccuracy sucks.

     

    330 with playoffs.  

    130+ pitches. 

    6 man rotations instead of 4. 

    All of this was REALLY too difficult of a concept to grasp?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    The point is that inaccuracy sucks.

     

    330 with playoffs.  

    130+ pitches. 

    6 man rotations instead of 4. 

    All of this was REALLY too difficult of a concept to grasp?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    330 with playoffs.  

    130+ pitches. 

    6 man rotations instead of 4. 

    All of this was REALLY too difficult of a concept to grasp?

    I dunno. I don't like to post inaccurate statements.  Maybe I'm the weird one.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    330 with playoffs.  

    130+ pitches. 

    6 man rotations instead of 4. 

    All of this was REALLY too difficult of a concept to grasp?

    I dunno. I don't like to post inaccurate statements.  Maybe I'm the weird one.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    Burnes' CY was announced LESS than ONE year ago. So you're just wrong. It is great that you're so brave to make a big deal out of this. There is a mathematical convention for the "timing of things during a year," and your belief is not consistent with that. So, admit your mistake and move on. Be a better man.

     

     

    Is he measuring in YEARS or in SEASONS?

    Now if it wasn't last season...it would have to be the season before? Hence he won a Cy Young two SEASONS ago. 

    And he's not the one who made a big deal of this. You're the one who's nit picking the most benign things. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    24 minutes ago, Robocaller said:

    Burnes' CY was announced LESS than ONE year ago. So you're just wrong. It is great that you're so brave to make a big deal out of this. There is a mathematical convention for the "timing of things during a year," and your belief is not consistent with that. So, admit your mistake and move on. Be a better man.

     

     

    Is he measuring in YEARS or in SEASONS?

    Now if it wasn't last season...it would have to be the season before? Hence he won a Cy Young two SEASONS ago. 

    And he's not the one who made a big deal of this. You're the one who's nit picking the most benign things. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Robocaller said:

    I dunno. I don't like to post inaccurate statements.  Maybe I'm the weird one.

     

    Eh....you'd probably hate to look back and read some of your previous posts then. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Robocaller said:

    I dunno. I don't like to post inaccurate statements.  Maybe I'm the weird one.

     

    Eh....you'd probably hate to look back and read some of your previous posts then. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    Is he measuring in YEARS or in SEASONS?

    Now if it wasn't last season...it would have to be the season before? Hence he won a Cy Young two SEASONS ago. 

    And he's not the one who made a big deal of this. You're the one who's nit picking the most benign things. 

    accuracy is important to avoid miscommunication. Part of my religion. As recently as yesterday I thanked someone for correcting me (I thought the Angels' Quero was brother to our Quero). 

    Life is a continual improvement process for me.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    Is he measuring in YEARS or in SEASONS?

    Now if it wasn't last season...it would have to be the season before? Hence he won a Cy Young two SEASONS ago. 

    And he's not the one who made a big deal of this. You're the one who's nit picking the most benign things. 

    accuracy is important to avoid miscommunication. Part of my religion. As recently as yesterday I thanked someone for correcting me (I thought the Angels' Quero was brother to our Quero). 

    Life is a continual improvement process for me.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    It's not. Maybe Burnes doesn't get a nine year deal but if he enters free agency healthy, he's looking at a $300m deal easily.

    MLB contracts only escalate. Corbin Burnes is the best pitcher in baseball. If he enters free agency, or even comes close to it, he will receive a $300m deal.

    Do you think the Dodgers or Mets care if he's worth $40m in 2030?

    It really is though. What other pitcher has gotten 9 years and 300M?

    In fact, I don't think a pitcher has gotten 7 in the last couple years. 

    They're usually 5 or 6 years now. 

    And I do not agree Burnes is the best pitcher in baseball. deGrom is the best pitcher in baseball and I don't think it's particularly close. After him there are a number of pitchers you could argue are better than Burnes(Wheeler being one, Scherzer...Verlander among them). 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

    It's not. Maybe Burnes doesn't get a nine year deal but if he enters free agency healthy, he's looking at a $300m deal easily.

    MLB contracts only escalate. Corbin Burnes is the best pitcher in baseball. If he enters free agency, or even comes close to it, he will receive a $300m deal.

    Do you think the Dodgers or Mets care if he's worth $40m in 2030?

    It really is though. What other pitcher has gotten 9 years and 300M?

    In fact, I don't think a pitcher has gotten 7 in the last couple years. 

    They're usually 5 or 6 years now. 

    And I do not agree Burnes is the best pitcher in baseball. deGrom is the best pitcher in baseball and I don't think it's particularly close. After him there are a number of pitchers you could argue are better than Burnes(Wheeler being one, Scherzer...Verlander among them). 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    Eh....you'd probably hate to look back and read some of your previous posts then. 

    the difference is I acknowledge when I'm wrong.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    Eh....you'd probably hate to look back and read some of your previous posts then. 

    the difference is I acknowledge when I'm wrong.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Robocaller said:

    accuracy is important to avoid miscommunication. Part of my religion. As recently as yesterday I thanked someone for correcting me (I thought the Angels' Quero was brother to our Quero). 

    Life is a continual improvement process for me.

     

    And just 5 minutes ago you were arguing if the 2021 season was last season or two seasons ago. 

    Seems to me you're enjoy arguing pointless issues while willfully ignoring the very clear point being made and in doing so, sidetrack a discussion. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Robocaller said:

    accuracy is important to avoid miscommunication. Part of my religion. As recently as yesterday I thanked someone for correcting me (I thought the Angels' Quero was brother to our Quero). 

    Life is a continual improvement process for me.

     

    And just 5 minutes ago you were arguing if the 2021 season was last season or two seasons ago. 

    Seems to me you're enjoy arguing pointless issues while willfully ignoring the very clear point being made and in doing so, sidetrack a discussion. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 minutes ago, UpandIn said:

    And just 5 minutes ago you were arguing if the 2021 season was last season or two seasons ago. 

    Seems to me you're enjoy arguing pointless issues while willfully ignoring the very clear point being made and in doing so, sidetrack a discussion. 

    While acknowledging that much of the world is Gray, I cherish and defend those things which are black and white.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...