Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

NYM non-tenders Johnny Estrada


brewers255
Mets non-tendered catcher Johnny Estrada, outfielder Ben Johnson and RHP Juan Padilla.

Estrada was a goner from the moment Brian Schneider was acquired, if not before then. Johnson and Padilla get knocked off the roster because they haven't recovered from injuries as well as hoped. The Mets may offer minor league contracts to both.

rotoworld.com

 

Would you have any intrest of signing him to like 1 or 2 million per year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Melvin wins another trade, it looks like.

Depends if Mota remotely works out. We are responsible for his what.. 3.2 million dollar salary, Mets might have won by a salary dump if Mota doesn't work out.

 

I don't see $3.2 million as much risk at all for this team. We are beyond the days when this was a major deal. If it turns out Mota wasn't worth it I'd still consider it a worthwhile deal. The only way to get something for nothing is to take a gamble. One year at close the league average salary is as close to negligable as it gets.
There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see what you are saying, but couldn't we have used that 3.2 Million for say.. LF Help or backup utility player. Mota is a known cheater, so who nows, maybe he'll end up on the Mitchell report and be suspended for even longer. (Not sure if that will happen as he paid his dues). So really, we might have just got bambozolled by the Mets and we could have just non-tendered Estrada.

 

I hope it works out. I personally would love to be signed for 3.2. http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/smile.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see what you are saying, but couldn't we have used that 3.2 Million for say.. LF Help or backup utility player.

 

I think we have enough backup utility type players already. I'd rather they spent money on medicore bullpen help vs medicore utlity help at this point with this club. If the choice was between paying Mota 3.2 or a starting caliber LFer then I'd agree it was a bad investment. I don't think that is the case though. I think there is money enough for both. That was why I think a $3.2 million gamble isn't the impediment it once would have been.

There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that article that Estrada put quotes in at the end of the season, about how he owes us and wants to show us the catcher he really is not one that has injury issues etc.. I almost feel bad for him, but at the same time maybe something is really up for Estrada and people don't like him.. Brian Anderson said he was great in terms of media, always wanted to talk, nice etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is a trade with winners or losers, at least at this point. If Mota pitches well I'll change my tune, but this was clearly a change of scenery trade of guys who had fallen out of favor.

 

While the Mets definitely wanted to dump Mota, the idea that a $3.2M commitment would prevent them from much of anything doesn't seem plausible...that's little more than a rounding error on their $116M payroll. My sense is that they wanted to get something for Mota, and had some level of desire for Estrada after their FA catching solution evaporated (Torrealba), so they agreed to swap problems with Milwaukee. Then at some point their plans changed, when they got Schneider in particular...apparently they were trying to trade Estrada in the Schneider deal and in subsequent discussions, but got no takers. Johnny's personality apparently hasn't endeared him to the wider baseball community, and his production has faded to the point where teams are less inclined to put up with him any more.

 

While I'm sure that they'll give Mota a long look to start the season, my hunch is that they don't expect all of the guys behind Gagne and Riske to pan out...which is why they have a bunch of them. One of the trio of Torres, Mota, Turnbow could become a mopup man or be jettisoned early...that is of course in addition to the cheaper and younger but similarly volatile McClung and Aquino.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is a trade with winners or losers, at least at this point.

 

Agreed 100% -- The Mets certainly achieved what they set out to do.

 

the idea that a $3.2M commitment would prevent them from much of anything doesn't seem plausible...that's little more than a rounding error on their $116M payroll.

 

Yeah -- I don't think it was the money as much as the amount of hate Mota got from Mets fans.

 

Then at some point their plans changed, when they got Schneider in particular...

 

I think Estrada was never more than a "Plan B" or fallback position for the Mets. They were hedging their bets with Estrada basically. I think that the Mets were never interested in Estrada wearing a Mets uniform.

 

One of the trio of Torres, Mota, Turnbow could become a mopup man or be jettisoned early...that is of course in addition to the cheaper and younger but similarly volatile McClung and Aquino.

 

I suspect Mota and Torres will be locked into their positions because of their salaries. They will have to suck a lot harder than McClung/Aquino to lose their jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...