Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

How big is the collapse by the Mets?


bthurley19
I can't think of a bigger collapse by a team in recent memory. Lost a 7 game lead in 17 days. They were in first place since May, I believe. Is this one of the biggest collapses in baseball history? Maybe some of our stats junkies can pull together some information.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

On August 11, 1951 the Brooklyn Dodgers had a 13 1/2 game lead on the New York Giants before losing the 3-game tiebreaker series to the Giants that ended with Bobby Thompson's HR. In 1964, the Phillies blew a 6 1/2 game lead with 10 games to play, ending up tied with Cincinnati in 2nd place behind St. Louis. In 1978, the Red Sox led the Yankees by 14 games in late July (and the Brewers by 9 games) before the Yankees came charging back and ultimately won the division in the Bucky Dent game.

 

While the Mets' collapse isn't the biggest ever in terms of games, I think it might be when you factor in their monstrous payroll and the fact that they're arguably the most talented team in the National League. I actually wouldn't be surprised if Willie Randolph was fired tomorrow...that's just the way New York works.

"[baseball]'s a stupid game sometimes." -- Ryan Braun

Twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. 1995 California Angels

Peak Playoff Probability: 99.988% after games of August 20th

Odds of Collapse at Peak: 8,332-to-1 against

Record at Peak: 66-41, 9.5 games ahead of the Rangers and 12.5 Games ahead of the Mariners in the AL West; 12.0 games ahead of the Yankees for the Wild Card

Record after Peak: 12-26

 

Wow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know if its quite that simplisic. Yeah, in the end its how many you win out of 162, but with a 7.5 game lead with 2 1/2 weeks to play, you can't blow that lead. You just can't. You almost really have to try hard to lose.

 

Its hard to fault Willie Randolph, too. Tom Glavine goes out today and gives up 7 earned runs in 2/3 of an inning. Hard to blame the manager for a future HOF stinking it up in what really was a playoff game for New York.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically, it's something for the media to use cliches about.
It's also something people should be telling their grandchildren about. Russ Hodges' call, for instance, is absolutely classic:
There's a long drive, it's gonna be, I believe...THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT!! THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT! THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT! THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANT! Bobby Thomson hits into the lower deck of the left-field stands! The Giants win the pennant and they're going crazy, they're going crazy! Ohhhhh-oh!!!''

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cubs collapse of 1969 still strikes me as unbelievable. It wasn't the greatest collapse in terms of game ahead they were at some point in the season. However, I'm shocked at how far back they ended up. They were up 9 games on August 16th and finished the season 8 games in back of the Mets. That's a 17 game swing in 45 days.

User in-game thread post in 1st inning of 3rd game of the 2022 season: "This team stinks"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quantifiables aside, my opinion is our own collapse this year was worse. It dragged out over a long stretch, and while Philadelphia was charging hard, the Cubs left it out there for the taking.

 

Plus our relievers were probably worse, and that added to the agony and made the collapse feel worse. Our top 3 relievers (in terms of IP) were a lot less effective than the Mets'. They might have been better in terms of things like K:IP, but they were worse in terms of results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cubs collapse of 1969 still strikes me as unbelievable. It wasn't the greatest collapse in terms of game ahead they were at some point in the season. However, I'm shocked at how far back they ended up. They were up 9 games on August 16th and finished the season 8 games in back of the Mets. That's a 17 game swing in 45 days.
I think the huge part of that particular story was the rise of the Mets. They had never finished better than ninth place before that season, and they went on to win the World Series.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really takes two to make a memorable collapse. One team just sucking really bad isn't as dramatic as one team sucking while another just explodes out of nowhere to win it. Our collapse isn't as big in my mind since we played bad, while the Cubs had one hot streak but didn't exactly turn it up to make up a huge margin at the very end of the season like the Phillies did.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really takes two to make a memorable collapse.

 

I know what you mean the "race" for the 2007 NL Central pennant was more along the lines of "let's see who can suck the least".

 

Charlie Manuel probably should have bought stock in pacemakers as redefined the meaning of "roller-coaster season"

 

I like that Philly team though, glad to see them in as opposed to the NYM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, does this mean Wes Helms is in the playoffs?

 

BBTN said that only 2 other teams in the history of MLB have blown this much of a lead oever 17 games, so, yeah, I think the collapse was pretty big.

 

Good on the Phillies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Mets even sent an email out to their fans apologizing for the season. Heres a couple of quotes from it.

 

"All of us a bitterly dissapointed in failing to achieve are collective goal of building upon last years sucsess."

"We did not meet our orginzations expectations-or yours."

 

I am not sure whether to all this a classy move by the organization or some sort of cruel joke. EDIT: spelling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, does this mean Wes Helms is in the playoffs?

 

Oh, criminy, I didn't even think of that. No No No No No.

 

I can accept Sharpie in the postseason, and I was relieved to get closure last night on the Brady Clark issue. But Big Wes? Geez.

Remember: the Brewers never panic like you do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...