Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

07/15/2004: Brewers (Davis) at Cubs (Prior)


batman
  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Sellers.

 

 

These guys just aren't good enough, folks. Playoff-caliber teams score runs. This group can't.

 

Its gonna piss some people off, but with the glut of teams still "believing" they are in it, Doug getting his tradeable guys on the market now could pay dividends.

 

We're sellers, people. Its time to face it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might be a great motivator, which in-and-of itself is a good thing in pro sports, but he is one of the poorer in-game managers in baseball today.

 

don't agree with that one bit. I almost always agree with (or at least understand) Yost's moves. He is our first manager in over a decade with a clue as to how to manage a pitching staff (and i think most comes from Maddux).

The only move I typically don't agree with is not pinch-hitting for the catchers more often, but lately (tonight included) he's done that much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yost is a terrible in game manger, there is no way about it. He handles the starting pitching well, but the bullpen has no set rotation with people going days without pitching. He doesn't realize that Grieve should never be replaced by Clark if the Brewers are behind. He keeps Bennett playing past the time the starting pitcher goes out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally I'm on the other side of this discussion, but I think Ned Yost is a very good manager despite his in-game shortcomings. He does a great job of motivating his players, he doesn't hit-and-run, sacrifice, and steal very much, and he does a great job of limiting his starters' pitch counts.

 

I'll take him, warts and all. I do wish he would reconsider some of his in-game tendencies and just generally improve as a tactician, but hopefully that will come with time.

 

Sucky game.

 

~Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think Yost is a good manager, but he is terrible with his in game decisions. I just hope that he doesn't have the ingrained Cox way of doing things and that he is willing to learn from someone on how to make better decisions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before people start ranting about how walks are useless, we *did* do a good job of getting baserunners tonight. The problem is that we have several black holes in the lineup that always make outs. If they would chip in with the occasional walk or base hit, we'd be fine, or at least more fine than we are right now. And when one of your black holes is your #3 hitter, you have problems.

 

~Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how people keep making dramatic statements (good or bad) based on the performance of one game. The Brewers offense has been this bad all year, and look what the record is. Each loss isn't some harbringer of imminent doom, nor does a Cubs sweep signal the wild card is imminent.

Moderation, my friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prescisely.

 

And the fact is, Overbay arguably should be the #3 hitter. There is just nobody else to protect Jenkins, though.

 

Time to be sellers. Move Santos, Grieve, and Counsell as best as possible. If Spivey were healthy... maybe the Crew could get some decent help. As it is, Doug Melvin HAS to look for the best catcher available in free agenct and sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moderation, my friends.

 

Indeed. I've fallen victim to overreaction more than my share of times, but tonight wasn't as bad as it is being made out to be. We got a lot of baserunners... that's a good thing. If we keep getting this many baserunners every game, I guarantee we will score enough runs to win a lot of games. We might never be an offensive juggernaut, but I think there are a lot of positives to take out of tonight's game.

 

Jenkins isn't one of them, although he did draw a walk. That's a start, right?

 

~Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Jenkins doesn't need protection since he can't hit anything. Maybe if he would stop always swinging he could get on base.

 

2) Why move Santos? He has pitched fairly similar to Davis this year and is making the minimum. Selling Davis high might be an idea, but really no reason to do that either.

 

3) The Brewers are not going to sign a FA catcher of any note.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor

I knew that comment would set a few people off!

 

http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/roll.gif

 

9 walks is great, but it's not the team that walks the most that gets the win. I'm as big a proponent of OBP as just about anyone (except Bill and Al) but you need guys that can, y'know, HIT, to bring those walks in. You just *aren't* going to get those 4 walk innings often enough to create a whole heck of a lot of runs.

 

And Bill, you can say that we'll score a heck of a lot of runs if we keep walking like this, but I don't see it. This team is in an offensive slump BIG TIME, and taking 9 walks, while getting only 5 hits (2 of which were infield singles) is not exactly a precursor to busting out.

 

OBP = Good.

 

Runs = the end result

 

We're not seeing the end result. Why? No hitting. Why? No sluggers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...