Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

7/28/05 Giants (Hennessey) @ Crew (Santos) 7:05 CST


ja002h

Bill is talking about how .500 won't even be close to winning the wildcard. Really Bill? Thanks.

 

If Hardy is incapable of hitting the ball on the ground to the right side, can he really be considered a future #2 hitter?

 

With the pitcher after him I'll bet ya he was more concerned with just getting a hit. Would be silly to sacrifice the runner over so Santos can NOT hit the ball out of the infield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 280
  • Created
  • Last Reply

God, you'd think a team like the Brewers that NEEDS every extra win that they can get wouldn't be so putrid at fundamentals. You'd think they would have figured that stuff out FIRST.

 

Damian Miller should not be batting in the 2-spot today. He's decent for a catcher, but he's slow and the farthest thing from 2-spot material in the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we would snag a couple of extra games each year if our pitchers batted above .100.

 

That's an interesting question, H0ffy. The batting line for National League pitchers is .135/.163/.172 while the Brewers are hitting .094/.112/.115 in 192 at-bats.

 

So using a really simple Runs Created formula (OXS), Brewers pitchers have contributed (.094 x .112 x 192) 2.02 runs. If they had been league average, they would have contributed (.135 x .163 x 192) 4.22 runs, or an increase of 2.20 runs.

 

That's probably not even a win by itself, as most high-leverage offensive situations result in pinch-hitters taking at-bats away from the pitching staff. A few well-placed hits could obviously have swung the win-loss outcomes of a handful of games, but you can say that about any team and any position.

 

I thought it would be a bigger difference but it doesn't seem to be a big deal. More important would be the team's pitchers' abilities to get bunts down and make productive outs, probably, but again I'm not sure if that really has a whole lot of impact on the team's record.

 

~Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be silly to sacrifice the runner over so Santos can NOT hit the ball out of the infield.

 

The ball doesn't have to leave the infield to score from third. In fact, Vic's weak hitting could actually be a benefit - a weakly hit ball could easily score the runner.

 

I see your point, but trying to go the opposite way can do absolutely no harm. It takes a base hit to the left side to advance the runner, but any ball on the ground to the right at least moves the runner and a hit scores him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ball doesn't have to leave the infield to score from third. In fact, Vic's weak hitting could actually be a benefit - a weakly hit ball could easily score the runner.

 

or the giants could pull the infield in because they know Vic cant hit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you saw Hardy the begining of the year you'd see why trying to hit the other way does actually hinder some players

 

Whether you are good at it or not, there are times you have to try to go to the right side. Runner on 2nd and nobody out is one of those times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...