Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Off-Season Transactions - Prior To Rule 5


MassBrew
  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

(last November) the Brewers also picked up infielder Enrique Cruz in the Rule 5 draft, then made the unorthodox move of signing him to a two-year extension in June. Cruz remains the only Brewer signed past 2004.

 

That contract would likely preclude anyone from taking him on. The Brewers might not agree to take him back if offered. I'd say Enrique's agent did an outstanding job working out that agreement last season, as detailed in this link:

 

www.jsonline.com/sports/b...145494.asp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Money is never a tiny matter these days, relative to any & everything, especially in Milwaukee. Plus, he's not a relief pitcher http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/smile.gif .

 

I agree with MB's assessment, I wouldn't be surprised if the team was hoping someone else would pick him up as much as it would seem odd wasting a 25-man spot on him all of last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know as much about salary rules as some here, but the article linked lead me to believe they would have had to pay him $300K this year, even if he were sent to the minors. Thus, the extension makes him cheaper if he's in the minors, while paying him more if he makes the majors.

 

That's a steep price for a player who'll probably be sent to Class AA Huntsville in 2004. Instead, the Brewers and Cruz agreed to a deal that will pay him $135,000 next year and $145,000 in 2005, if he is in the minors both years. If he plays in the majors, his salaries would be $320,000 and $325,000, respectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there anyone out there that wants to let Cruz waste another year where he gets maybe 100 or so ABs and might hit .150? He obviously can't help a team now and if he misses another year of full time playing, I think it's even more doubtful that he'll help a team in the future.

 

I think the fact that nobody claimed him on waivers is another indicator that he won't be claimed in Rule 5.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the fact that nobody claimed him on waivers is another indicator that he won't be claimed in Rule 5.

 

That was alluded to by Melvin in an article in the JS on 12/10. His take was basically, no team claimed him for the $20,000 it would cost to do so, it's doubtful any team would then spend $50,000 to take him in rule V (or is it 5?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting back to Machado, does anyone know if he was in a hitter's league prior to coming to the organization. I recall at the time of acquisition I was excited about his doubles total and batting average. However, he looked overmatched during the week I saw him in Huntsville. The way he holds the bat doesn't help his cause. He needs to move his hands back. Anyone with info on him or his league while with the Royals??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Cruz's contract extension doesn't make him less desireable as a rule V , it does make him unwanted as a waiver claim to play in AA. Now the $$ the Crew gave him makes more sense, it seems this was planned all along.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"88.6% of all statistics are made up right there on the spot" Todd Snider

 

-Posted by the fan formerly known as X ellence. David Stearns has brought me back..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new issue of BA shows that the Brewers resigned catcher Alex Delgado and signed an outfielder by the name of Freddy de la Cruz. I assume de la Cruz is on the AZ Brewers roster.

 

BA also shows Jacob Cruz signing with the Reds. He shows up on MLB.com's Louisville roster as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new issue of BA shows that the Brewers resigned catcher Alex Delgado and signed an outfielder by the name of Freddy de la Cruz. I assume de la Cruz is on the AZ Brewers roster.

 

BA also shows Jacob Cruz signing with the Reds. He shows up on MLB.com's Louisville roster as well.

 

Thanks for the transaction heads-up as of late, rpms6. Nice to know there's another "wire" nut out there besides yours truly.

 

When Jacob Cruz' name was placed on the Brewers' mlb.com Indy roster and then removed shortly thereafter, we inquired to our friends with the Crew. The comment was they couldn't comment at this time, so something certainly fell through with that signing and it's been removed from the Brewerfan transaction wire.

 

The Alex Delgado signing makes a lot of sense. A Delgado-Chris Coste-Mark Johnson AAA tag-team isn't embarassing in the least, with one of the three a possible Chad Moeller backup. Kade Johnson needs to catch in Huntsville four of five nights and show something at the bat through April and May at the least.

 

And yeah, Freddy de la Cruz is probably a 16-18 year old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...