Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Linebrink acquired for Inman/Garrison/Thatcher


Lorax1
  • Replies 526
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We just got one of the premier releivers on the market for some great young talent who weren't going to pitch in Milwaukee this year.

 

Inman, Garrison, and Thatcher all project as probable major leaguers and San Diego might think they've won this trade in 2 or 3 years but we are about the present.

 

Well, you can be about both winning now and winning later, it doesn't have to be all or nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HOLY COW!

 

I can't believe we traded Inman. I am shocked. I spent the first few minutes really upset.

 

But I have calmed down. In Doug I trust.

 

I have to remind myself that even though Inman was probably our #1 prospect - that doesn't mean he was any where near Braun or Gallardo.

 

Most saw him topping out as a #3 starter. And he has struggled a lot in AA. He isn't a flame thrower. And he is short as well. He just doesn't project to the majors.

 

My guess, the Brewers soured on him and the rest of that bunch. I think we basically just traded Inman for 2 comp picks. (And apparently we feel those two comp picks have a better chance of helping us than Inman)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now we're not even getting him for two days? This just gets better.

 

Um, as opposed to getting here tomorrow? It's not THAT big of a deal even if his wife wasn't going to have a baby some time in the next 24 hours.

 

My first thought about the trade was why a contender like the Padres would be dealing bullpen arms in exchange for minor leaguers. Maybe they know something about Linebrink that the Brewers don't or they really like the guys they got back much more than what the Brewers do. My second thought was the compensation picks the team would receive if Linebrink does walk as a free agent would help offset the prospects given up to get him in the first place. Overall then, I think this is a good (not necessarily great) move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems steep. Inman for Linebrink straight up would have seemed steep to me, but definitely more palatable.

 

...I'm still waiting for a new report that says "Brewers get Linebrink and..." insert moderate prospect here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
I really think that Garrison is going to be a good pitcher some day. He's been really good lately at BC and is only 20 years old.
"Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power......He probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop." Keith Law, 2006
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so worried about the HRs Linebrink has given up but his K rate is WAY down. But Melvin said his scouts checked the guy out and he looks sound, so I can only hope so. He's only had 45 IP this year, so the evidence isn't very strong to the contrary.

 

Still, add everything up and I'm just not very excited about this trade. You are upgrading 25 IP of maybe a 4.5 ERA pitcher for a 3.5 ERA pitcher. That works out to something like 4 runs saved. Now, those 4 runs are going to probably come in higher leverage situations but still. One win, maybe?

 

Melvin said the compensatory picks weighted heavily in his decision, so I have to think he was not very high on Inman at all. I hope he's right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
I can't get over how in love with minor league baseball some of you are.

 

Yeah there is no reason for Brewers fans to be excited about our minor leagues. Good thing we traded to acquire Sheets, Hall, Prince, Rickie, JJ, Braun, Yo, Corey, and Gwynn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first reaction to this trade was "unbelieveable". I totally trust in what Doug has done here in Milwaukee and hopefully he made the right decision here. I really thought Inman had the chance to be the next big thing according to many here.

 

Sure, we could get some picks from the deal, but we are giving back some great talent, for perhaps, a solid reliever. I just hope this is not a rental!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on his track record I can trust that Doug's scouting said Inman was a reasonable risk to let go. But considering the volume of interesting pitchers we gave up I'm concerned. It they were going to offer that much why not throw in another really good position prospect like Gamel and see what Texas had to say about Texeria?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What bothers me about Linebrink is that the Padres are right in the middle of the race and they don't seem to think he's worth keeping around. It also bothers me that we gave up Inman. Now the Brewer system is pretty devoid of right handed pitching prospects. Plus of all the many lefthanders, Garrison may be near the top.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been intrigued by Thatcher,with the Padres calling him up,i'm very curious to see how he does.

 

The thing is Thatcher has a great story and i want to cheer for the guy to do well,but if he pitches great,then i'll feel even worse about this trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, we could get some picks from the deal, but we are giving back some great talent, for perhaps, a solid reliever. I just hope this is not a rental!

 

Well, it's either the rental or the picks

 

I'll take rental, personally, but maybe Linebrink can get some old Maddux Magic and turn it around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To clear up the draft picks: Linebrink will be a Type A so the Brewers will get.

 

1. A sandwich pick between the first and second round. It's likely this will be high. (Last year there were 34 sandwich picks, 16 of which were type A's, which go first.)

 

2. A compensatory pick from the team that signs Linebrink. It will be a first rounder unless the pick would be a top 15 pick (which are protected). Then it would be a second-round pick. Given the economics of baseball, top relievers are usually signed by high-payroll teams that finish well.

 

A good guess would be the picks being somewhere around what the Dodgers got for Julio Lugo, #20 & #39.

 

Just an FYI since there were some questions about the picks. The Crew could sign Linebrink long term, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What bothers me about Linebrink is that the Padres are right in the middle of the race and they don't seem to think he's worth keeping around.

 

This is the same organization that thought the acquisitions of Marcus Giles, Michael Barrett, Kevin Kouzmanoff, and Russell Branyan (maybe add Milton Bradley) would bolster their offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like a lot to pay for a reliever who is having a down year but maybe Melvin knows something we don't. He seems to be a guy who trusts his scouts and there haven't been a whole lot of times in the past when his scouts have been wrong.

 

Having said that this looks an awful lot to me like a preliminary move to picking up a bat for one of our current pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...