Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Do we need to watch Villanueva's innings?


twobrewers

Al mentioned the 'frequency of use' thing in his blog, too. I guess with the warming up and such, we have to consider Carlos' 54 relief innings as being equivalent to a greater number of 'starter' innings.

 

If we were to put Villanueva into the rotation today and use him 'normally' for the duration of the regular season and playoffs, though, I don't think there'd be much of an innings issue.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
You have to bring heat (almost all closers) or have a devastating changeup (hoffman) to close. Villanueva as a set-up guy, maybe. Not as a closer.

 

 

No, that's not true. You have to be able to get outs (especially strikeouts), and Villanueva can do that. There have been plenty of closers who didn't have great fastballs.

 

That said, I don't want Villanueva in the pen beyond this year. He should be in the rotation in 2008, it doesn't matter who they bump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just list a few dominant closers that didn't qualify as either: 1) fireballers; 2) changeup or other "special" pitch specialist.

 

can't think of anyone that can't crack 90, and doesn't have a "special" pitch either, that was a dominant closer in the last 20 years. Those guys are starters or middle relievers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
just list a few dominant closers that didn't qualify as either: 1) fireballers; 2) changeup or other "special" pitch specialist.

 

can't think of anyone that can't crack 90, and doesn't have a "special" pitch either, that was a dominant closer in the last 20 years. Those guys are starters or middle relievers.


 

 

This is partly (that is to say, wholly) due to a selection bias that many people have against guys that aren't huge fastballers. People (including MLB people) have in their mind an idea of what a closer should look like and don't like to deviate from that.

 

Also, there have only been 3 long-term dominant closers over the last 15 years (Rivera, Hoffman, Wagner) and 1 of them hasn't thrown hard in years and another only has one pitch (a 93-94 mile an hour cut fastball). I don't see how that's enough of a sample size to say anything definitively.

 

Plus, Villanueva can crack 90, he gets as high as 92 or so. And how can you say he doesn't have a "special" pitch? He gets Ks at a very good rate, which indicates to me that ML hitters seem to think he has one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor

pretty sure quiz had a specialty pitch.

 

Villanueva's change is approaching Wise-esque status. It's not there yet, but it's getting closer, and it's a very good pitch.

 

And, as Joe said, his velocity tops out at about 92. If he becomes exclusively a single inning guy, I think he'd work more in the 92 range as opposed to topping out there.

Chris

-----

"I guess underrated pitchers with bad goatees are the new market inefficiency." -- SRB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adding onto what Casey said, a ":heavy" workload for a reliever is about 100 innings, most go about 60-80 innings.

 

Fro a starter, 175-200 is normal, but anything over 225 or so is considered a lot.

 

Why? Well, I think it's harder throwing 5 times in a week and a half for 1-2 innings each than it is pitching twice in that span for 100 pitches. Warming up 6-7 times is also harder than warming up twice and throwing lightly between starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Villanueva's change is approaching Wise-esque status. It's not there yet, but it's getting closer, and it's a very good pitch.
Does this mean that we can expect the 'defense' behind Villanueva to 'perform' a bit better than it 'performs' for other pitchers? Carlos' current .740 defensive efficiency rating is quite a bit higher than the team's .693 mark or the majors' (approximately) .694 mark.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...