Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

2021 Miscellaneous College Football Thread


LouisEly
 Share

I fully agree that you shouldn't be able to play for a title if you don't win your own conference championship. Why not go with just conference champions? SEC, Big 10, ACC, PAC 12, Big 12, AAC, Mountain West, Sun Belt/Conference USA/MAC?

 

The main driver that I like about putting the playoff appearance on conference championships is that it opens up better non-conference matchups. As it is now, very few teams want to schedule ranked opponents early since one loss can submarine your chances. If all that matters to get to the playoff is to win your conference, non-conference losses don't matter.

“I'm a beast, I am, and a Badger what's more. We don't change. We hold on."  C.S. Lewis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 472
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
The problem with the 4 team playoff (as it stands now) is we never get to see if a zero loss team like Cincinnati is the "best" team, because they effectively have no chance of getting in. I don't think they ARE the best team, but they aren't even being given a chance to prove it on the field, and that sucks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Community Moderator

I like the 4-team playoff as well. In my view the CFP isn't "real" college football, it's just a spectacle for making money like the rest of the bowl system. Bowl games are not "real" college football games, they are made-for-TV exhibition games played at neutral sites in nice weather. It's still fun, but nobody gets excited about NY6 games anymore and the Mayo bowl and others are basically a joke, at least for teams that began the season with playoff ambitions.

 

If they are going to do 8 teams, I want the first round played at campus stadiums. Otherwise the whole thing will just be another round of meaningless bowl games with the Big Ten team being the road team every time while the SEC teams treat the games as warm ups for the semifinals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the line came out with OSU at -20 I thought it was high for a top 10 matchup, then they cover in the first quarter and looks like it’ll be about 50 by halftime. Yikes

 

I have watched some MSU this year...they have not impressed me. I'm gonna clean up today unless something wild happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the line came out with OSU at -20 I thought it was high for a top 10 matchup, then they cover in the first quarter and looks like it’ll be about 50 by halftime. Yikes

 

I have watched some MSU this year...they have not impressed me. I'm gonna clean up today unless something wild happens.

 

A lot of pregame talk was the MSU weaknesses aligned directly with the strengths of OSU. It was pitched as a bad matchup, and proven to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Community Moderator
Results like this show why the playoff is the same rotation of teams every year.

 

Also should show why this year's Bama team has no business being in front of OSU or Oregon if those two programs with much better schedules don't lose another game....but thats not going to happen

 

We’ll see. This is the kind of result that gets the committee’s attention. Plus they can pad their resume again next week, although Michigan will probably put up more of a fight. A tough road game is the only way OSU ever loses a conference game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Results like this show why the playoff is the same rotation of teams every year.

 

Also should show why this year's Bama team has no business being in front of OSU or Oregon if those two programs with much better schedules don't lose another game....but thats not going to happen

 

Oregon will be out of the equation after this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't look like it. First tie breaker would be winning percentage between the 4 would be both wisconsin and Minnesota at 2-1 and Iowa and Purdue at 1-2 which would eliminate Iowa and Purdue and then it would go to head to head which Minnesota would then win.

 

If Purdue loses to Indiana knocking it to 3 teams, it would be 1-1 across the 3 so the next tie breaker is division winning percentage, which wisconsin would win with only 1 loss compared to 2 for Minnesota and 3 for Iowa.

Remember what Yoda said:

 

"Cubs lead to Cardinals. Cardinals lead to dislike. Dislike leads to hate. Hate leads to constipation."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think I could take the Gophers beating us to get to Indy after last Sunday.

 

That probably would be the worst possible outcome.

Although it probably doesn't matter who goes to Indy from the West the buckeyes are probably going to curb stomp them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course losing to the Gophers, having Fleck and the rest of the team run around the field with the Axe only to look up at the jumbotron and see Indiana win on a last second field goal to send Bucky to Indy would be the all time greatest comedy. How did Indiana get so bad so fast again?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...