Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Brewers sign Daniel Robertson- 1 Year Deal, $900,000


markedman5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Community Moderator

 

This guy checks all of the Stearns boxes.

 

Plays multiple positions [check]

Former Tampa Bay Ray [check]

Struggled in most recent full season [check]

Many years of team control remaining [check]

I've never heard of him [check]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy checks all of the Stearns boxes.

 

Plays multiple positions [check]

Former Tampa Bay Ray [check]

Struggled in most recent full season [check]

Many years of team control remaining [check]

I've never heard of him [check]

Although he can't be optioned, so he misses on one box.

Not just “at Night” anymore.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to grade out as a passable 3B and SS defensively, and a plus 2B. Has played the OF and 1B as well.

 

He was really good in 2018. Since, not so much.

 

"Really good" is a bit of a stretch IMO. I'd settle for "solid" in 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, this Brewers offseason just gets more brutal by the day!

 

Please...can someone (anyone!) provide me some sabermetric data on this guy that might get me even just the slighted bit excited about this signing. Anyone???

 

Robertson posted a 122 OPS+ & 3.1 WAR over 340 PAs in 2018.

 

If he does something like that again in 2021 it would be pretty cool.

 

He probably won't though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to grade out as a passable 3B and SS defensively, and a plus 2B. Has played the OF and 1B as well.

 

He was really good in 2018. Since, not so much.

 

"Really good" is a bit of a stretch IMO. I'd settle for "solid" in 2018.

 

3.1 WAR is really good in my book...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From some cursory reading, Robertson's 2018 was shortened by a thumb ligament injury/surgery, 2019 he dealt with a nagging knee injury he played through and eventually went under the knife. So he's a former first rounder who had some good flashes. His minors numbers don't pop out at you but it appears he was progressed pretty aggressively since being drafted. I'm not necessarily trying to lead you down the primrose path, but if he's able to stay healthy I could see why Stearns sees something in him. If we're cash strapped, which we are, there's probably worse players to try to catch upside with.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't begin to say I'm excited about the signing but for $900K plus incentives, I think it's an ok signing. He offers good defense at multiple positions and isn't afraid to draw a walk. Batting from the right side doesn't exactly help with any possible platoons however.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s pretty obvious where Stearns is going this offseason. Just about every signing so far has been a 26ish year old former high draft pick who just hasn’t gotten it going in the big leagues yet.

 

This is a good point. Instead of going after cheap guys who have proven that they can be productive major leaguers, but either fell on hard times or are one-dimensional, he's going after a bunch of "pedigree" types who have big tools, for for some reason or another have never hit it big. Interesting theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3+ career WAR isn't bad for a part-time player over 4-ish MLB seasons. Obviously he's competition Mathias, Lopes, & possibly Urias. One thing's for sure: they can't all stick.

 

Like Lopes, not an exciting move but maybe will provide some value.

 

Waiting for something more significant.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s pretty obvious where Stearns is going this offseason. Just about every signing so far has been a 26ish year old former high draft pick who just hasn’t gotten it going in the big leagues yet.

Obviously a decent and potentially value-laden profile for a cheaper price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone explain the MLB contract to a guy like this? Seems like a guy that would have easily been attainable with no MLB spot guaranteed? Or, am I wrong in that line of thinking?

 

League average offense (97 wRC+) with solid defense at 2B/SS will usually get you a major league deal if there's multiple teams interested. If he played another position (except CF/C) with those numbers, probably not.

 

As always though it's more about what the front office expects going forward rather than what has happened in the past. What that is with Robertson I have no idea, I didn't know who he was. And I thought we had signed RP David Robertson. But he's 26, and has at least some past success. Something about his game makes them think he can do that again. Or perhaps they just wanted a more experienced player to fill the utility role. This team likes to not use a 5th OF and instead have a primarily infield utility guy who can fill in there short-term. Perez, Franklin, Holt, Peterson, Mathias, Sogard are all examples in recent yearsa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s pretty obvious where Stearns is going this offseason. Just about every signing so far has been a 26ish year old former high draft pick who just hasn’t gotten it going in the big leagues yet.

 

This is a good point. Instead of going after cheap guys who have proven that they can be productive major leaguers, but either fell on hard times or are one-dimensional, he's going after a bunch of "pedigree" types who have big tools, for for some reason or another have never hit it big. Interesting theory.

It is the better approach in my opinion. The most likely window for a player to have a breakout career season is between ages 26-to-28. I know it would be preferred if they didn't have to rely on the "throw stuff against a wall" approach, but if you are going to employ such a strategy then finding guys that still have hope to boost the top of their career arc would be my choice every time.

Not just “at Night” anymore.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although he can't be optioned, so he misses on one box.

blame the rays for burning his first option his rookie year. had they recalled him on 1 september 2017 when rosters were eligible to expand, he wouldn't have burned his first option.

 

people do realize that by signing robertson, it's now extremely unlikely that the club re-signs eric sogard, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although he can't be optioned, so he misses on one box.

blame the rays for burning his first option his rookie year. had they recalled him on 1 september 2017 when rosters were eligible to expand, he wouldn't have burned his first option.

 

people do realize that by signing robertson, it's now extremely unlikely that the club re-signs eric sogard, right?

 

That's an excellent point. I give Robertson a LOT of credit for not being named Sogard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Although he can't be optioned, so he misses on one box.

blame the rays for burning his first option his rookie year. had they recalled him on 1 september 2017 when rosters were eligible to expand, he wouldn't have burned his first option.

 

people do realize that by signing robertson, it's now extremely unlikely that the club re-signs eric sogard, right?

 

That's an excellent point. I give Robertson a LOT of credit for not being named Sogard.

 

Meh... his parents really deserve that credit. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...