Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Game 16: Packers @ Bears - Sunday, January 3rd , 3:25PM CT


homer
That should've been a flag on Hicks for pulling on Williams' helmet at the end of that run.

And he took a swing at linsley on the first drive, so that would be an ejection. Maybe the league can suspend him for their playoff game.

Remember what Yoda said:

 

"Cubs lead to Cardinals. Cardinals lead to dislike. Dislike leads to hate. Hate leads to constipation."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 383
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Everyone knew the WR position needed to be addressed going into the draft. MVS didn't all of the sudden start dropping passes this year. Instead we went with the usual "Do something, Aaron" philosophy again.

If the WR position needed to be addressed, how come Rodgers leads the league in TD passes and even if you take away every one of Adams' TDs he would still be 10th in the league in TD passes?

 

That doesn't sound like a need to me.

 

I wouldn't go that far. I think we all know that it is a need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone knew the WR position needed to be addressed going into the draft. MVS didn't all of the sudden start dropping passes this year. Instead we went with the usual "Do something, Aaron" philosophy again.

If the WR position needed to be addressed, how come Rodgers leads the league in TD passes and even if you take away every one of Adams' TDs he would still be 10th in the league in TD passes?

 

That doesn't sound like a need to me.

And if this year results in coming up short of a Super Bowl again, how can you say the result is unexpected? Imagine if Bill Walsh had said "Who needs Jerry Rice? We've got Montana."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the WR position needed to be addressed, how come Rodgers leads the league in TD passes and even if you take away every one of Adams' TDs he would still be 10th in the league in TD passes?

 

That doesn't sound like a need to me.

And if this year results in coming up short of a Super Bowl again, how can you say the result is unexpected? Imagine if Bill Walsh had said "Who needs Jerry Rice? We've got Montana."

You are trying to correlate an argument where MVS is the problem for the ENTIRE WR position group and thus the entire offense. Just stop, it's beyond awful.

"Counsell is stupid, Hader not used right, Bradley shouldn't have been in the lineup...Brewers win!!" - FVBrewerFan - 6/3/21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is "Call me Kat" the only new show coming out on Fox this year? Good grief, I'm already tired of it from the commercials.

 

I used to make jokes about Masked Singer ads during games when that first came out but apparently that show is a big hit. Lowest common denominator TV, I will never get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine if Bill Walsh had said "Who needs Jerry Rice? We've got Montana."

 

So the Packers have their Rice (Adams). Who did SF draft after Rice? Because that would be a comparable. I believe Taylor was their next WR and he wasn’t a 1st rounder.

"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the WR position needed to be addressed, how come Rodgers leads the league in TD passes and even if you take away every one of Adams' TDs he would still be 10th in the league in TD passes?

 

That doesn't sound like a need to me.

And if this year results in coming up short of a Super Bowl again, how can you say the result is unexpected? Imagine if Bill Walsh had said "Who needs Jerry Rice? We've got Montana."

You are trying to correlate an argument where MVS is the problem for the ENTIRE WR position group and thus the entire offense. Just stop, it's beyond awful.

I'm really not. Would you consider any other receiver on the team a legitimate #2 behind Adams? I certainly wouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tonyan is pretty legit. I don't think we have a legit #2 but the TE group is pretty good and Adams is obviously highly elite. MVS and Lazard are complementary guys. I'd agree they don't have a 2 but I can't name too many #2 receivers in Tom Brady's career either.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So given that the Bears are in the playoffs (AZ losing), we would end up playing them if they can beat NO. Not much chance of that, but...

Unfortunately it's lining up for us to be playing Tampa first. The one team I want no part of.

Yes, but it will be in Green Bay. What does Brady know about playing in the cold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So given that the Bears are in the playoffs (AZ losing), we would end up playing them if they can beat NO. Not much chance of that, but...

Unfortunately it's lining up for us to be playing Tampa first. The one team I want no part of.

 

Not crazy about that either, but we only need one of Washington (or New York), Rams, or Bears to win to avoid that matchup.

 

Also at least it won't be at RFK. Should be a different type game here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...