Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

2020-09-12: Cubs (Hendricks) at Brewers (Suter) 6:10 PM CDT [Brewers lose, 4-2 -- Hader blows save in 9th]


Eye Black
  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I never thought that trading Yelich at some point for a king's ransom rather than extending him was a bad idea. I know some people laughed and laughed at the concept, and still do, but a contract like Yelich's is going to be crippling for a small market franchise given the amount of years if the last two years turn out to be an aberration. Building around a singular star sounds great in theory, but you can see how well it has worked for the Angels.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never thought that trading Yelich at some point for a king's ransom rather than extending him was a bad idea. I know some people laughed and laughed at the concept, and still do, but a contract like Yelich's is going to be crippling for a small market franchise given the amount of years if the last two years turn out to be an aberration. Building around a singular star sounds great in theory, but you can see how well it has worked for the Angels.

 

I thought it was bad because even if the contract works out the last few years are pretty much just written off. The first Braun contract was fantastic but the second has been pretty terrible. Small market teams cannot afford to be paying players big money into their mid to late 30s.

 

I'm thinking it has to be the knee and he will bounce back but even if he does the last few years of the contract will probably not be worth it to the Brewers. Lets just hope next season we see closer to MVP level Yelich or we will have major issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don’t sign an MVP to an extension when he’s willing to stick around, you don’t want to see winning baseball. You want to see mediocre players win 75 games and light up the chat rooms about the prospects who are coming in 2-3 years. Plain and simple.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don’t sign an MVP to an extension when he’s willing to stick around, you don’t want to see winning baseball. You want to see mediocre players win 75 games and light up the chat rooms about the prospects who are coming in 2-3 years. Plain and simple.

 

Who was that MVP player on the Royals when they won it all a few years ago?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don’t sign an MVP to an extension when he’s willing to stick around, you don’t want to see winning baseball. You want to see mediocre players win 75 games and light up the chat rooms about the prospects who are coming in 2-3 years. Plain and simple.

 

Its called cycling talent and it has to be done by small markets to sustain success. This team cannot afford to be paying 20 million or more to guys on their last legs. As great as Braun was during his first extension the second one was a mistake and that will probably be the case with Yelich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as their is no salary cap and I am hopeful that the small markets will hang together to get one in the next agreement teams like the Brewers cannot allocate 20 million dollars a season to any player that is not productive. Hopefully starting next season Yelich will be back to an MVP level but its no sure thing.

 

Too many people seem to just be willing to throw out all stats for 2020 if they are bad. If thats the thinking why shouldn't we throw out the seasons of Burnes and Williams since this is such an unusual season. Fact is who knows what is an anomaly and what is the start of a trend. Hopefully Yelich is struggling because of the knee but we dont if that is the reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don’t sign an MVP to an extension when he’s willing to stick around, you don’t want to see winning baseball. You want to see mediocre players win 75 games and light up the chat rooms about the prospects who are coming in 2-3 years. Plain and simple.

 

Who was that MVP player on the Royals when they won it all a few years ago?

 

Anomaly’s happen. Royals have had 4 winning seasons in the last 30 years and are one of the main examples of teams unwilling to pay for talent and trading it away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don’t sign an MVP to an extension when he’s willing to stick around, you don’t want to see winning baseball. You want to see mediocre players win 75 games and light up the chat rooms about the prospects who are coming in 2-3 years. Plain and simple.

 

Counter: If you sign an MVP to a contract extension and then don’t spend money putting players around him you just end up winning 75 games anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling some folks here are unhappy with Yelich's contract because he doesn't seem to have it this year. When he is playing at an MVP level nobody complains.

 

I just hope he HAS another MVP level season.

Seems like everytime the Brewers have ever handed out a big contract it blew up in their face

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...