Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Game 2: Vikings @ Packers - Sunday, Sept 15th Noon CT


homer
  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This is going to end up being an extremely deflating loss with the way it started.

 

Deflating but well-earned.

"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That can not be a catch.

 

Why? Hit the ground, but didn't bobble. That had call stands written all over it.

 

Come on, adam.... he bobbled his whole way during and after that. I agree that it was unlikely to be overturned, but that want a catch beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That can not be a catch.

 

Why? Hit the ground, but didn't bobble. That had call stands written all over it.

It bobbled after his roll. I changed my mind after they showed the back replay after I posted that showed it wasn't moving during his roll. I assumed how it popped up it must have been moving.

Remember what Yoda said:

 

"Cubs lead to Cardinals. Cardinals lead to dislike. Dislike leads to hate. Hate leads to constipation."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That can not be a catch.

 

Why? Hit the ground, but didn't bobble. That had call stands written all over it.

 

Come on, adam.... he bobbled his whole way during and after that. I agree that it was unlikely to be overturned, but that want a catch beyond a shadow of a doubt.

 

So why would you agree that it would be unlikely to be overturned? Seems that by your definition it met every criteria to be reversed. I agree if wasn't a catch beyond a shadow of a doubt, that's why I said it had call stands written all over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Why? Hit the ground, but didn't bobble. That had call stands written all over it.

 

Come on, adam.... he bobbled his whole way during and after that. I agree that it was unlikely to be overturned, but that want a catch beyond a shadow of a doubt.

 

So why would you agree that it would be unlikely to be overturned? Seems that by your definition it met every criteria to be reversed. I agree if wasn't a catch beyond a shadow of a doubt, that's why I said it had call stands written all over it.

 

Maybe I misread the premise of your post. I thought you were saying it was undeniably a catch, while I think there was a CHANCE they thought it wasn’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...