Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Wisconsin Basketball Thread 2019 - 20: BIG TEN CHAMPS & BPI NCAA Champs!


homer
 Share

To me, that Davison foul looked awfully intentional, and it follows a pattern with him. Considering the timing and game situation, it's inexcusable. Hate to say it, but he's definitely entered Grayson Allen territory with his reputation.

 

I mean, it looked weird and silly, yes. I agree. It's a dumb move, and Davison has this habit of putting himself in bad situations, and we're to the point where he's just not going to get the benefit of the doubt.

 

My question is, what is an F1 call trying to discourage in that scenario? That's a dumb play. Is it dangerous? I don't know. He wasn't cheap-shotting the guy in the groin (which I've seen plenty of times on a basketball court), he wasn't barreling through with an elbow, he wasn't even using the screener as leverage. It just seems really silly that, after the play (as a result of a Wisconsin timeout, no less), you use your monitor privileges to review THAT play. I mean, is that really worth sending a message about little, chippy tactics?

 

Again, no real bearing on the outcome, and I think Davison was wrong. It just seems like a whole lot of effort for something that just isn't that big of a deal, especially when guys are jersey-tugging on screens all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 647
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Brewer Fanatic Contributor

He was absolutely cheap shotting the groin.

 

https://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2020/1/28/21111937/brad-davison-cheap-shot-wisconsin-badgers-iowa-video-dirty

 

He wasnt fightimg through a screen. He was pulling a Grayson Allen.

 

If anything, based on th e repetitive nature of Davisons infractions, I'd say he should be sat a game, as it has now directly lead to a situation where it influenced a game outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brad Davison is a loser. I was happy when the flop rule became a thing so I could stop watching Davison try to audition for a theater production instead of playing basketball. Give the guy a break though, he has to find a new cheap way to gain an advantage that doesn’t require actual basketball skills.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be okay with them moving on from Brad Davison. At what point do you stop defending him and allowing his antics to continue? What a bad look right now for the program with his actions and a player simply not traveling with the team.
"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be okay with them moving on from Brad Davison. At what point do you stop defending him and allowing his antics to continue? What a bad look right now for the program with his actions and a player simply not traveling with the team.

 

I hope there was more to that than just being upset about the direction of the team. A lot of Badger fans hope he comes back, but I would hope he doesn't if the rumors are true. Forget that he is second on the team in scoring, you are pretty much a locker room problem when you bail on your team. Team has to go on the road to Iowa, a huge road conference game in a thick race, and he leaves them high and dry. Even worse they end up losing it by a few points. It looks terrible he would decide to bail on them after they get slaughtered by Purdue in a game where he managed zero points in 28 minutes. Scoring a point or two would probably help the direction of the team. I just don't see how you have a reunion after that, seems like a good time to pack your bags and leave.

 

It really is not a good look for Gard. You got one player ready to quit and another punching guys in the junk to help cost you the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think Davison was doing anything intentional. You swing your arms as you run and he was low to the ground and kind of falling so it looks bad. It's not unimportant to remember the screener was setting an illegal moving screen and slid into that, if he doesn't move it doesn't happen. But, with his past crap he gets no benefit of the doubt and I get that. Also, at this point the pendulum has swung so far on him that he gets no charges called. Any contact with him is called against him. He's actually cut out the exaggerating and flopping, which he should since he gets no calls now. At this point it's probably biased against him, as opposed to his freshman year when he seemed to get every call.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, he had no choice on the flopping. He had to stop because there was now a rule to punish floppers. Before there wasn't much risk other than it not getting called and you laying on the floor as the play goes on, making you kind of a liability on defense.

 

One could argue he didn't intentionally punch the guy in the junk the other night. It was not necessarily a blatant shot like the original one he pulled. To me he still hooked the guy which is bad on him, regardless of whether the screen was legal or not. With his history it seemed pretty shady, but what I have seen this year is refs more willing to go to a flagrant or a flagrant two. They called a flagrant two last night on a guy because he pulled the arm when a guy was going up for a layup...seemed like a pretty extreme call when he simply tugged it. Not like he ripped him to the ground on his head. I don't think they are giving much leeway these days and a history of dirty plays won't help the cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was absolutely cheap shotting the groin.

 

https://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2020/1/28/21111937/brad-davison-cheap-shot-wisconsin-badgers-iowa-video-dirty

 

He wasnt fightimg through a screen. He was pulling a Grayson Allen.

 

If anything, based on th e repetitive nature of Davisons infractions, I'd say he should be sat a game, as it has now directly lead to a situation where it influenced a game outcome.

 

Do you really see an intentional groin shot on either of those videos? Seriously asking, because when I watch the replays, I see Davison's hand much closer to the knee than the old bean bag.

 

I have no idea what was in Davison's head. As I said, stupid play. But what do you see that makes you "absolutely" sure it was a cheap shot? Again, I just don't see that level of evidence on the video...are you using his reputation as a factor in that claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor

In my opinion, let me be clear on that... Someone that watches that 2nd angle and doesnt see a purposeful nut shot is just being a homer. It is what it is.

 

We all defend our guys. I dont wanna defend that. Thats not "swinging his arm" or playing hard. Guys like Davison who get the rep of being dirty players earn it by being dirty.

 

Play hard. Dont punch guys in the dick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It definitely looked like Davison took a swing at the groin area of the Iowa player. I tried looking at it like he may have been swinging his arm to run, but it certainly looks like it was not a typical arm swing running motion. He swung his arm pretty dang hard in a sort of upper cut motion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, let me be clear on that... Someone that watches that 2nd angle and doesnt see a purposeful nut shot is just being a homer. It is what it is.

 

We all defend our guys. I dont wanna defend that. Thats not "swinging his arm" or playing hard. Guys like Davison who get the rep of being dirty players earn it by being dirty.

 

Play hard. Dont punch guys in the dick.

 

I agree with most of this, though, I do think if Davison wanted to cheap shot the guy, he would have. I don't see him making contact, even in that second angle, and, having been in those situations, it's pretty easy to actually cheap shot...

 

Bottom line is, stupid move, potentially unsportsmanlike, and a bad look.

 

One thing I will say without reservation is that this team's guards are not good enough. The backcourt needs to play a lot better if they are going to make any kind of run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been on the fence of whether or not I think it was a flagrant foul. The rules regarding a flagrant foul are kind of vague and depends greatly on the reffing crew. Usually it is summed up as excessive and unnecessary contact. It was definitely intentional and unnecessary. Was it excessive, I guess that is debatable. Though I do think the area He decided to start swinging leaves very little wiggle room before it is considered excessive. Similar to the head (the one on top of your shoulders) has a lower level to achieve excessive.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Strange timing. Doesn't he know the transfer rules?
"Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power......He probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop." Keith Law, 2006
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn’t seem all that strange of timing when you consider circumstances. I am guessing it is more than just disliking how they play, hence why he is suddenly bailing out in the meat of the schedule. Seems like there is probably more behind the scenes that made the relationship really toxic. I would imagine it takes more than that to prefer quitting mid year over playing for your current team.

 

Having someone transferring is one thing, but having them throw in the towel in January is a pretty bad look for Gard. Though to be fair it’s hard to really blame Gard or know how much blame to put on him when there is probably a lot of details we will never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
It's strange because he waited until 2nd semester. Now he can't get that half a year back. At least that's how I understand it
"Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power......He probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop." Keith Law, 2006
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's strange because he waited until 2nd semester. Now he can't get that half a year back. At least that's how I understand it

 

Right, though he could always build a case to get a waiver. Which personally I don’t know what even constitutes or doesn’t constitute one.

 

I’d guess something happen of recent that just ticked King off that much. It was probably rocky long before, but something likely was a last straw type deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...