Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Troy Tulowitzki


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Intriguing - with what they did after acquiring Moose, I wonder if Tulo can play 3rd if 2nd isn't an option? Tulo's 0.919 career OPS against lefty pitching would look pretty sweet in the lineup assuming he's healthy enough to actually play everyday again.

 

Tulo and Arcia on the left side, slide Shaw over to 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if MLB contracts have offset language? Is Toronto on the hook for $38M, -OR- the difference between $38M and whatever Tulo signs for? If it's the latter, then it's pretty much a given that he'll sign for the minimum.

 

They're on the hook for all $38 million. Anything Tulo signs for will be on top of what he gets paid from Toronto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
I think it's totally worth a 1 year deal and presumably it would only take the MLB minimum. If he gets hurt you call up Hiura. This assumes he is willing and/or able to play 2nd base. I do think the Brewers can do better though.
"Dustin Pedroia doesn't have the strength or bat speed to hit major-league pitching consistently, and he has no power......He probably has a future as a backup infielder if he can stop rolling over to third base and shortstop." Keith Law, 2006
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to have him, but only if he's healthy. Hard to know whether he is or not but the Blue Jays eating $38 million is not a good sign.

 

We already have an aging disappointment from the 2005 draft, no thanks.

 

An "aging disappointment"? Yeah we really swung and missed on that pick... :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if MLB contracts have offset language? Is Toronto on the hook for $38M, -OR- the difference between $38M and whatever Tulo signs for? If it's the latter, then it's pretty much a given that he'll sign for the minimum.

 

that is correct. If we sign him for $1 million, the Jays would owe him $37million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d be all over it for 1 year prove deal. Really there is zero risk & all reward if he actually performs. Health has been a long issue but at the cost.... what does it hurt? A roster spot? If he isn’t working out you can dump for for next to nothing.

 

Braun produces enough & his leadership in locker room has been huge for them. His babip has been really low & from watching it’s not due to him not hitting ball hard. Hasn’t found holes. Still a 1+ WAR and above average wRC+ guy. You hope he can stay more healthy & get back up 2 .290+ Got two more years, hope for best

Proud member since 2003 (geez ha I was 14 then)

 

FORMERLY BrewCrewWS2008 and YoungGeezy don't even remember other names used

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We already have an aging disappointment from the 2005 draft, no thanks.

 

An "aging disappointment"? Yeah we really swung and missed on that pick... :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes

 

You don’t have to think everything so seriously.

 

If you don’t think Braun has been widely dissapointing recently well....don’t know what to tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if MLB contracts have offset language? Is Toronto on the hook for $38M, -OR- the difference between $38M and whatever Tulo signs for? If it's the latter, then it's pretty much a given that he'll sign for the minimum.

 

that is correct. If we sign him for $1 million, the Jays would owe him $37million.

 

Wait...is that true? I just assumed that any team was on the hook for a signed contract.

 

That doesn't seem right because teams would be cutting guys all the time just in hopes that a new team would sign a new contract for even 15-20% of the deal to cut into their losses.

 

Wouldn't the Blue Jays owe $38 million no matter what and anything a new team signs him for (say $1 mililon) is supplemental?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if MLB contracts have offset language? Is Toronto on the hook for $38M, -OR- the difference between $38M and whatever Tulo signs for? If it's the latter, then it's pretty much a given that he'll sign for the minimum.

 

that is correct. If we sign him for $1 million, the Jays would owe him $37million.

 

Wait...is that true? I just assumed that any team was on the hook for a signed contract.

 

That doesn't seem right because teams would be cutting guys all the time just in hopes that a new team would sign a new contract for even 15-20% of the deal to cut into their losses.

 

Wouldn't the Blue Jays owe $38 million no matter what and anything a new team signs him for (say $1 mililon) is supplemental?

 

I think DHonks is correct. I looked at a comparable situation (Pablo Sandoval), and the Giants simply signed him for the league minimum (https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/san-francisco-giants/pablo-sandoval-5355/cash-earnings/. For Sandoval, he's due to earn $23M in 2019 from the contract he signed with the Red Sox, but their obligation is $22,445,000 while the Giants are paying him the minimum of $555,000.

 

The articles I've seen about Tulo's release don't get into this, but all seem to be under the assumption that Tulo could be had for the Vet minimum, so they authors are working under the belief that anything in addition to the minimum is just doing the Jay's a favor.

Gruber Lawffices
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, I believe that is the standard procedure for all sports related contracts, including coaching contracts.
"Counsell is stupid, Hader not used right, Bradley shouldn't have been in the lineup...Brewers win!!" - FVBrewerFan - 6/3/21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'm just surprised that teams don't cut guys like a Robinson Cano as much. They ended up getting slight value added in a trade but if I have a complete dud at 4 years, $100 million left that still might sign for 3 years, $20 million elsewhere, I'd consider just cutting ties.

 

If I'm the Cubs I consider dumping Jason Heyward.

 

I just assumed that a player was due all of the money from a team.

 

Of course in a lot of these cases you just say that it's better to have Heyward and pay him $100 million instead of not have him and pay $80 million, but it just seems like this should be happening a bit more often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is there is no incentive for a team to actually pay more than the minimum. If Team A offers him $10mil and Team B offers him $1mil, he's still going to go with whichever team he prefers regardless of the money because he's getting the same amount anyways. So if you cut a big contract, there's really no chance a team is going to cut into that debt for you at all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is there is no incentive for a team to actually pay more than the minimum. If Team A offers him $10mil and Team B offers him $1mil, he's still going to go with whichever team he prefers regardless of the money because he's getting the same amount anyways. So if you cut a big contract, there's really no chance a team is going to cut into that debt for you at all.

 

Ah, yeah. There we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...