Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Brewers sign Matt Albers - 2 year deal


KeithStone53151
During Albers first 21 games he had an ERA of 1.08 with a WHIP of 0.88 and K:BB of 21:5. In his last 7 games since coming back from injury his ERA has been 28.80 and a WHIP of 4.00 and 7:4 K:BB. Clearly something is still wrong with him although he says he is healthy. He has also been very unlucky as his BAbip is .625.

 

Albers is on an incredibly team friendly contract for this year and next; $2.5M each. Are you saying you would throw all of that away because of these last few games?

 

I'm frustrated as well but am not willing to risk losing a good pitcher based on a knee jerk reaction.

It's that "grass is always greener" philosophy. Same thing with the people that want Barnes back up. He was sent down for a reason (general suckiness), and while his numbers are better in AAA in only 6 innings, he still has 5 walks, which is concerning. But at least the Brewers still own his rights. DFA Albers, and him and his cheap contract is gone. Probably to the Cardinals, where he'd immediately put up a sub 2 ERA.

with two open roster spots, and no immediate need to add jimmy nelson back to the 40-man roster, there isn't that pressing of a need to remove a player from the 40-man roster. were the 40-man full, matt albers might be tied to a different fate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
off days the next two mondays. if the brewers don't put albers on the disabled list with a legit injury, can they get away with burying him in the bullpen, or will he be dfa'd?

 

Burying a guy on a team trying to win a pennant seems counterproductive to me. I’d rather see Albers get DFA’ed and make better use of his spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need a full pen until rosters expand, but I can't see a DFA. Alberts isn't Sogard or Drake; he has a decent resume. I don't think you DFA him because of a few terrible outings after an injury. However, his conditioning may be a factor in his performance, as a more fit player would probably recover better. I suppose I could see it being a really tough decision, with them ultimately going in another direction because of fitness. But I don't consider that likely.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need a full pen until rosters expand, but I can't see a DFA. Alberts isn't Sogard or Drake; he has a decent resume. I don't think you DFA him because of a few terrible outings after an injury. However, his conditioning may be a factor in his performance, as a more fit player would probably recover better. I suppose I could see it being a really tough decision, with them ultimately going in another direction because of fitness. But I don't consider that likely.

 

His resume isn't that impressive. He had a brutal -0.9 fWAR season as recently as 2016.

 

I don't think we can afford to keep Albers on a team that is both contending and relying heavily on its bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, what is the point of using a roster spot for a older reliever that you cannon rely at ALL. This is not much different at this point then when wang was on the team in 2011 and couldn't be used. His pitches last night were down the middle with no movement, it was basically BP.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's signed for next year. No way the team cuts him. He is the mop up guy or he will be on the DL again. September is close, and he could be hidden on the roster then.

 

Mop up? You have to get some outs to mop up. He can't get 3 outs much less go 2 innings. He's been allowing a HR to every 3rd batter or so he's faced since June 1st. He's owed $2.5 million next year and will be 36? If they can't eat that then they can't eat any contract. He needs to find a new career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need a full pen until rosters expand, but I can't see a DFA. Alberts isn't Sogard or Drake; he has a decent resume. I don't think you DFA him because of a few terrible outings after an injury. However, his conditioning may be a factor in his performance, as a more fit player would probably recover better. I suppose I could see it being a really tough decision, with them ultimately going in another direction because of fitness. But I don't consider that likely.

 

His resume isn't that impressive. He had a brutal -0.9 fWAR season as recently as 2016.

 

I don't think we can afford to keep Albers on a team that is both contending and relying heavily on its bullpen.

 

And an FIP under 3.5 in 4 of his last 5 seasons before this one. There's still a good chance that he's better than the alternative the rest of the way. This is just like Sogard and Drake. If better players grew on trees, the Brewers would have them. They're not just going to cut a bad player with some track record of success for a bad player with no track record or pedigree. That's kind of impulsive. If they see something wrong with Albers, they will DFA him, but he probably deserves a chance to redeem himself considering the alternative is probably even more of a crapshoot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to try to way to at least audition Albers next season in the spring. I realize how terrible he is right now, but he was so good all of last year and this year up until June.

 

The best solution is to find an excuse to DL him until the end of August. Then rosters expand and you can bury him in deep mop up duty for the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whichever way the wind blows sums up this board to a tee. Guy was great last year and great this year until his injury. Now he's a pile of deuce, has zero talent and it was a horrific signing? Whine-bag city

He has been pitching poorly after coming back from his injury. He can't take up a bullpen slot in a pennant race pitching like that. Cutting him is a waste of 2.5 M next year, so having a phantom hammy is good for the club. Maybe he can right himself and be useful down the stretch.

 

Since coming back from the DL he's had 4 appearances, given up 10 runs and only recorded 5 outs. One way or another, that has to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cutting him would be pretty reactionary. This guy has been a decent to good reliever for a number of years. His slump is very inconvenient for sure. I think he’ll find himself, but maybe it costs us. I hope not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was great in his first 24 outings with the Brewers (3-1, 1.93 ERA). The game that lead to him being on the DL and the 4 games after he returned, he's fallen off a cliff. It's really not hard to believe that something is really wrong with him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was great in his first 24 outings with the Brewers (3-1, 1.93 ERA). The game that lead to him being on the DL and the 4 games after he returned, he's fallen off a cliff. It's really not hard to believe that something is really wrong with him.

 

It's also really not hard to believe that "something" is cheeseburgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
He was great in his first 24 outings with the Brewers (3-1, 1.93 ERA). The game that lead to him being on the DL and the 4 games after he returned, he's fallen off a cliff. It's really not hard to believe that something is really wrong with him.

 

It's also really not hard to believe that "something" is cheeseburgers.

 

Thanks ... now I'm the crazy guy laughing in a quiet office around 20 other people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was great in his first 24 outings with the Brewers (3-1, 1.93 ERA). The game that lead to him being on the DL and the 4 games after he returned, he's fallen off a cliff. It's really not hard to believe that something is really wrong with him.

 

It's also really not hard to believe that "something" is cheeseburgers.

 

Thanks ... now I'm the crazy guy laughing in a quiet office around 20 other people.

 

Between this, and talk of "eating" his contract or not... this is a laughing matter :laughing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...