Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Christian Yelich


 

Not sure how knowledgeable this guy is but........

 

McCalvy quoted it in a tweet of his own, for me that provides significantly more credibility. A trade for Yelich is one of my least desired off-season moves of the possiblities floated to this point.

 

If that is true you really must not like anything. 4 WAR players who play decent defense and are ascending with 370 OBPs and 300 averages with 20 HR and 15 steals must really be terrible baseball players.

 

It's not that I don't like yelich, I just know what the cost is and prefer to use our bullets on pitching rather than a position that is a strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 488
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Haurdicourt doesnt see Stearns giving up Brinson for Yelich since we didnt give him up for Gray or Quintana.

 

Yelich has more value than Gray does and Quintana has a slight edge over Yelich. Gray is a #3 type pitcher and you don't give up players like Brinson for a #3 type pitcher. Quintana is closer to a #1 type pitcher and I would give up Brinson for him but I can see why Stearns wouldn't give him up for Quintana.

 

I think Brinson, Peralta, and Dubon is what I would be comfortable in giving up for Yelich. That may not be enough for the Marlins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it depends what would be with him. Like the logic of they wouldn't trade him for Quintana/Gray so they won't now. That's not really accurate, they wouldn't trade him plus the three or four other prospects it would take for those pitchers. Quintana took a guy ranked top 10 and three others. Same here, straight up is different than Brinson, Santana, and Ortiz or whatever other prospects would be also in on it. It's just not an accurate way to describe it.

 

And in this case you have Santana already sitting there already who doesn't cost you anything to just keep him and have him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haurdicourt doesnt see Stearns giving up Brinson for Yelich since we didnt give him up for Gray or Quintana.

 

That would be nuts. One is a proven player with 5 years of control. The other is a prospect with 6 years of control. It's a no-brainer..

 

Judge and bellinger were mere prospects to start 2017, judge in particular had a dreadful 2016 of limited at bats. Both those guys are more valuable than yelich at this point, and it isn't all that close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haurdicourt doesnt see Stearns giving up Brinson for Yelich since we didnt give him up for Gray or Quintana.

 

That would be nuts. One is a proven player with 5 years of control. The other is a prospect with 6 years of control. It's a no-brainer..

 

Judge and bellinger were mere prospects to start 2017, judge in particular had a dreadful 2016 of limited at bats. Both those guys are more valuable than yelich at this point, and it isn't all that close.

 

And tons of guys flop too or just become ok/mediocre players too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Yelich is valued at a 4 WAR player over the next five years, which is a reasonable estimate as that is pretty much the average over the last three years, then his price will be way more than most people anticipate. Brinson is a mere start.

 

If I'm the Marlins GM, this is the first package I ask for:

 

Milwaukee gets:

OF-Christian Yelich

3B-Martin Prado

 

Miami gets:

OF-Keon Broxton

OF-Lewis Brinson

RHP-Brandon Woodruff

RHP-Luis Ortiz

2B-Isan Diaz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Yelich is valued at a 4 WAR player over the next five years, which is a reasonable estimate as that is pretty much the average over the last three years, then his price will be way more than most people anticipate. Brinson is a mere start.

 

If I'm the Marlins GM, this is the first package I ask for:

 

Milwaukee gets:

OF-Christian Yelich

3B-Martin Prado

 

Miami gets:

OF-Keon Broxton

OF-Lewis Brinson

RHP-Brandon Woodruff

RHP-Luis Ortiz

2B-Isan Diaz

Nope.

but it's not like every guy suddenly forgot every piece of advice he gave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really not sure if we should be emptying our farm and you have to assume P prospects would be involved, kind of the last thing MKE should be giving up. Kind of a numbers game there so need as many as possible to get a few to hit. Don't want to play scared but the Nats, Dodgers, and Cubs are basically loaded. I'd rather do smaller less risky things to be in the WC chase and with some luck the division while keeping the farm intact for a couple years down the line. Just adding one more P along the lines of Cobb probably puts their over/under on Ws around 84-85. You're involved in that ballpark while keeping your farm and still have fairly low payroll.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really not sure if we should be emptying our farm and you have to assume P prospects would be involved, kind of the last thing MKE should be giving up. Kind of a numbers game there so need as many as possible to get a few to hit. Don't want to play scared but the Nats, Dodgers, and Cubs are basically loaded. I'd rather do smaller less risky things to be in the WC chase and with some luck the division while keeping the farm intact for a couple years down the line. Just adding one more P along the lines of Cobb probably puts their over/under on Ws around 84-85. You're involved in that ballpark while keeping your farm and still have fairly low payroll.

I'd go Brinson, Burns, I. Diaz, Peralta, and Pennington and not feel like the farm was emptied.

but it's not like every guy suddenly forgot every piece of advice he gave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really not sure if we should be emptying our farm and you have to assume P prospects would be involved, kind of the last thing MKE should be giving up. Kind of a numbers game there so need as many as possible to get a few to hit. Don't want to play scared but the Nats, Dodgers, and Cubs are basically loaded. I'd rather do smaller less risky things to be in the WC chase and with some luck the division while keeping the farm intact for a couple years down the line. Just adding one more P along the lines of Cobb probably puts their over/under on Ws around 84-85. You're involved in that ballpark while keeping your farm and still have fairly low payroll.

I'd go Brinson, Burns, I. Diaz, Peralta, and Pennington and not feel like the farm was emptied.

 

:rolleyes :rolleyes

"I'm sick of runnin' from these wimps!" Ajax - The WARRIORS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why on earth does every made up offer on these boards always includes Isan Diaz? Geez, it's maddening.

 

Because he's a valuable trade chip and I'm sure if we're going to hold onto one of our two big 2B prospects we'd prefer to keep Keston Hiura.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really not sure if we should be emptying our farm and you have to assume P prospects would be involved, kind of the last thing MKE should be giving up. Kind of a numbers game there so need as many as possible to get a few to hit. Don't want to play scared but the Nats, Dodgers, and Cubs are basically loaded. I'd rather do smaller less risky things to be in the WC chase and with some luck the division while keeping the farm intact for a couple years down the line. Just adding one more P along the lines of Cobb probably puts their over/under on Ws around 84-85. You're involved in that ballpark while keeping your farm and still have fairly low payroll.

I'd go Brinson, Burns, I. Diaz, Peralta, and Pennington and not feel like the farm was emptied.

 

:rolleyes :rolleyes

Sorry. It just makes sense with Castro probably a short term answer there.

but it's not like every guy suddenly forgot every piece of advice he gave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why on earth does every made up offer on these boards always includes Isan Diaz? Geez, it's maddening.

Hiura is coming quick so one of those guys is expendable.

 

Diaz is NOT a throw in player, he is one of our blue chip guys, who should bring back a heck of a lot more than we are hoping for. I don't trade him at all unless we are getting a TOR pitcher in return. Hiura is no sure thing, not even close, so having some depth at a position where we typically have none is comforting.

 

Diaz is tossed around this board like he is nothing, I don't get it.

"I'm sick of runnin' from these wimps!" Ajax - The WARRIORS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion you do not make this move unless you have a solid trade set up for Braun and Santana, and are OK with going into 2018 with an offense of Brinson, Phillps and Yelich with Bronson as your #4

 

Broxton, right?

"I'm sick of runnin' from these wimps!" Ajax - The WARRIORS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why on earth does every made up offer on these boards always includes Isan Diaz? Geez, it's maddening.

Hiura is coming quick so one of those guys is expendable.

 

Diaz is NOT a throw in player, he is one of our blue chip guys, who should bring back a heck of a lot more than we are hoping for. I don't trade him at all unless we are getting a TOR pitcher in return. Hiura is no sure thing, not even close, so having some depth at a position where we typically have none is comforting.

 

Diaz is tossed around this board like he is nothing, I don't get it.

I don't consider him a throw in but you have to give up something to get something. It's going to take quite a bit more than Brinson to get Yelich.

but it's not like every guy suddenly forgot every piece of advice he gave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...