Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

2017-09-18: Brewers (Suter) at Pirates (Taillon) 6:05 PM CDT [Brewers win, 3-0]


hawing

Road series for real this time...

 

BREWERS (79-70)

SS Eric Sogard (L)

2B Neil Walker (S)

LF Ryan Braun ®

3B Travis Shaw (L)

1B Eric Thames (L)

RF Hernan Perez ®

C Stephen Vogt (L)

CF Brett Phillips (L)

LHP Brent Suter (L)

 

 

PIRATES (68-82)

SS Jordy Mercer ®

LF Jordan Luplow ®

CF Andrew McCutchen ®

3B David Freese ®

1B Jose Osuna ®

RF Gregory Polanco (L)

2B Sean Rodriguez ®

C Elias Diaz ®

RHP Jameson Taillon ®

Remember: the Brewers never panic like you do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

2 out of 3, let's go!

 

If we did happen to sweep, boy would this weekend series be an interesting one.

"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we win all remaining series (including 3/4 from the Cubs) we would finish with 86 wins.

 

The Cubs remaining games (besides us) are:

4 @ StL

2 @ TB

3 vs CIN

 

They would need to go 3-6 in those games for a division tie. If we sweep them and win our other series they would need to go 4-5 in those games for a division tie.

 

The Rockies remaining games are:

2 @ SF

4 @ SD

3 vs MIA

3 vs LAD

 

They would need to go 6-6 in those games if we will every series, forcing a play-in game for the play-in game.

 

 

 

I think winning all remaining series is a must.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

plz win so when I go tomorrow .500 is on the line k thx

Posted: July 10, 2014, 12:30 AM

PrinceFielderx1 Said:

If the Brewers don't win the division I should be banned. However, they will.

 

Last visited: September 03, 2014, 7:10 PM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we win all remaining series (including 3/4 from the Cubs) we would finish with 86 wins.

 

The Cubs remaining games (besides us) are:

4 @ StL

2 @ TB

3 vs CIN

 

They would need to go 3-6 in those games for a division tie. If we sweep them and win our other series they would need to go 4-5 in those games for a division tie.

 

The Rockies remaining games are:

2 @ SF

4 @ SD

3 vs MIA

3 vs LAD

 

They would need to go 6-6 in those games if we will every series, forcing a play-in game for the play-in game.

 

 

 

I think winning all remaining series is a must.

 

If we sweep the cubs, we would be even so we would just have to do better than they are. So if we also win our other series (go 6-3), the cubs would have to go 5-4 for the Brewers to win the division outright. Brewers at 89-73 to the cubs at 88-74. If we only take 3/4 and win our other series (6-3) and end up at 88-74, now the cubs going 5-4 would be a division tie with a play-in game. Or did I do the math wrong?

 

Overall, that's still asking us to go 10-3 and the cubs to go 5-8 (or 9-4, 5-8 for a tie), but you have to win to get in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we win all remaining series (including 3/4 from the Cubs) we would finish with 86 wins.

 

The Cubs remaining games (besides us) are:

4 @ StL

2 @ TB

3 vs CIN

 

They would need to go 3-6 in those games for a division tie. If we sweep them and win our other series they would need to go 4-5 in those games for a division tie.

 

The Rockies remaining games are:

2 @ SF

4 @ SD

3 vs MIA

3 vs LAD

 

They would need to go 6-6 in those games if we will every series, forcing a play-in game for the play-in game.

 

 

 

I think winning all remaining series is a must.

 

If we sweep the cubs, we would be even so we would just have to do better than they are. So if we also win our other series (go 6-3), the cubs would have to go 5-4 for the Brewers to win the division outright. Brewers at 89-73 to the cubs at 88-74. If we only take 3/4 and win our other series (6-3) and end up at 88-74, now the cubs going 5-4 would be a division tie with a play-in game. Or did I do the math wrong?

 

Overall, that's still asking us to go 10-3 and the cubs to go 5-8 (or 9-4, 5-8 for a tie), but you have to win to get in.

 

Nope you are right for some reason I was counting us starting with 77 win today. I must have been looking at some old standing. Winning all remaining series puts us at 88 wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He seems to be in love with Perez lately. He hasn't been doing bad but he hasn't been doing anything special either, just his normal self. Not sure why the sudden urgency for him to play every game. Has there been anything about Santana being hurt a bit? I haven't seen anything
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Santana not playing is getting absolutely ridiculous.

 

He has to despise Santana. He did this same thing last year and Santana isn't exactly old enough to need days off.

 

It's just a way to get his pet Perez in there. I'm hoping they make Villar the super sub next year and trade Perez. One of the reasons is it may be the only way Counsell won't overplay him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, Perez is 5 for 11 with 3 homers against Taillon

 

That explains it for today then. Thanks. Perez has been fine lately, nothing to be mad about. It's just been clear since the Villar CF day that it's been a push for Perez since then. I know they like to say he's the best OF on the team and overall good at D whatever the position, so that could be a part of it too after the Villar botched ball in CF to make D more of a priority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, Perez is 5 for 11 with 3 homers against Taillon

 

Don't confuse us with facts. Craig Counsell is the worst manager ever.

 

Some more confusing facts: Santana's OPS+ is roughly 40 points higher than Perez. So the difference is between a good or bad hitter. I think I know who I'd play if I was trying to get in the playoffs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen, playing a hot hand is one thing but sitting one out best hitters to do so in a playoff push is ridiculous. It's not calling Counsell the worst manager or anything close to it. It's simply questioning his decision and for good reason. Heck, maybe Santana is hurt and we just don't know. But god forbid we question it. :rolleyes
"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would bet Santana gets the first big PH opportunity; Suter isn't going to go very long tonight I'd think so I wouldn't be surprised to see Santana enter the game and Perez move into the IF.

 

Meaningful September baseball is so great.

 

*Edit - also glad to see Phillips in the lineup tonight. I kind of feel like he's our best option in CF right now, Keon is just swinging through too many hittable pitches at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen, playing a hot hand is one thing but sitting one out best hitters to do so in a playoff push is ridiculous. It's not calling Counsell the worst manager or anything close to it. It's simply questioning his decision and for good reason. Heck, maybe Santana is hurt and we just don't know. But god forbid we question it. :rolleyes

 

I think Santana is hurting. He exited a game a few games back after a HR and it came out on Twitter he hurt his shoulder...the exact quote was something "those can linger". I'll try to find it.

 

EDIT: Here it is:

 

Tweaked his trap...maybe it is lingering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes I get annoyed by all the PNC love. Yes, the view is great. The ballpark? Meh.

 

What don't you like about the ballpark?

"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What don't you like about the ballpark?

 

There's nothing I didn't like, just nothing that stood out about it to me either. It deserves credit for the setting, it's a great view. I guess it's just that without the view, it's just a ballpark. And if we're factoring in the setting in general, the area and atmosphere around the park was pretty dead when we went.

 

No ill will towards the park, I don't dislike it, just other parks I'd put above it on my list.

I am not Shea Vucinich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...