Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

2016-05-15 Padres (Vargas) at Brewers (Davies), 1:10 PM CDT [Brewers win, 3-2]

1992casey

By 1992casey,
in Archived Game Threads

1992casey Milwaukee Brewers

1992casey

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

[igt-2012][game-setup][logo]http://forum.brewerfan.net/igt/2016-logos/padres.png[/logo][game-info][h1]May 15 | 1:10 P.M.[/h1][h2]Padres (17-21)

Brewers (15-22)[/h2][h3]FSWI | WTMJ 620, WRRD 1510[/h3][/game-info][logo]http://forum.brewerfan.net/igt/2016-logos/brewers.png[/logo][/game-setup][pitching-photos]http://forum.brewerfan.net/igt/2016-pitcher-photos/opponents/padres_vargas-cesar-03.jpghttp://forum.brewerfan.net/igt/2016-pitcher-photos/brewers/brewers_davies-zach-11.jpg[/pitching-photos][game-matchup][divclass=away][pitcher]César Vargas[/pitcher][h2]0-2, 3.54 ERA, 1.72 WHIP[/h2][h3]Game Log[/h3][h3]Vargas will look to bounce back from the worst start of his young career. After allowing one run or fewer in each of the first three starts of his rookie year, he was touched for six runs on ten hits over four innings vs. the Cubs on Tuesday.[/h3][/divclass][divclass=home][pitcher]Zach Davies[/pitcher][h2]1-3, 6.29 ERA, 1.89 WHIP[/h2][h3]Versus Padres | Game Log[/h3][h3]In his last outing, Davies picked up his first win of the season, going five solid innings against the Marlins on the road. He allowed just two runs on five hits, while striking out one and walking three.[/h3][/divclass][starting-lineup][divclass=away]

  1. CF Travis Jankowski (L)
  2. C Derek Norris ®
  3. RF Matt Kemp ®
  4. 1B Brett Wallace (L)
  5. LF Melvin Upton Jr. ®
  6. SS Alexi Ramírez ®
  7. 2B José Pirela ®
  8. 3B Adam Rosales ®
  9. LHP César Vargas ®

[/divclass][divclass=home]

  1. SS Jonathan Villar (S)
  2. 2B Scooter Gennett (L)
  3. C Jonathan Lucroy ®
  4. 1B Chris Carter ®
  5. CF Kirk Nieuwenhuis (L)
  6. LF Alex Presley (L)
  7. 3B Hernán Pérez ®
  8. RF Ramón Flores (L)
  9. RHP Zach Davies ®

[/divclass][/starting-lineup][/game-matchup][game-links][h3][chat]BrewerFan Chat[/chat] | MLB Gameday[/h3][/game-links][/igt-2012]

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

pacopete4 Nashville Sounds

pacopete4

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
Scooter looks like he could have used more time on the DL. Looking horrible at the plate since his return.

Yeah, I was going to say the same thing. He looks lost the last few games.

 

 

I don't know what the rush was either. We had 2B covered pretty well in his absence.

"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pacopete4 Nashville Sounds

pacopete4

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
For everyone complaining about a lack of runs, just remember the Brewers of old wouldn't of even had most of these men on base. It will pay dividends eventually by being patient taking walks and the key hits will come.
"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pacopete4 Nashville Sounds

pacopete4

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
Whew! That could've been a disaster. BREWERS WIN!!
"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sdcheezhd Draft Eligible

sdcheezhd

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
I know Its the Padres but that was a nice start by Davies today.

 

FSSD had him as the Star of the Game before the 9th. They might want to think about JJ as well for working around the error just like on Friday. 2 very impressive saves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pacopete4 Nashville Sounds

pacopete4

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
I know Its the Padres but that was a nice start by Davies today.

 

FSSD had him as the Star of the Game before the 9th. They might want to think about JJ as well for working around the error just like on Friday. 2 very impressive saves.

 

 

No error on the play.

"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sdcheezhd Draft Eligible

sdcheezhd

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
I know Its the Padres but that was a nice start by Davies today.

 

FSSD had him as the Star of the Game before the 9th. They might want to think about JJ as well for working around the error just like on Friday. 2 very impressive saves.

 

 

No error on the play.

 

Correct, it was a "double."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stoutdude04 ACL Brewers

stoutdude04

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
I know Its the Padres but that was a nice start by Davies today.

 

FSSD had him as the Star of the Game before the 9th. They might want to think about JJ as well for working around the error just like on Friday. 2 very impressive saves.

 

 

No error on the play.

 

Don't even get started with that bogus ruling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1992casey Milwaukee Brewers

1992casey

Verified Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted

It was the correct call by the scorer; Domingo didn't touch it.

 

There's no question that he lost the ball in the lights. The Padres announcers said that he took a "nonchalant approach" and made a "mistake," but they didn't say what he might have done differently to possibly make the catch.

 

It looked to me like Domingo ducked to avoid getting hit in the head.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pacopete4 Nashville Sounds

pacopete4

Verified Member
Posted
Posted
Haven't seen it yet but he didn't touch it right? That's not a bogus ruling, it's the correct ruling.

 

I know it's correct, but I still think it's bogus. He missed it. To me, that's an error.

 

 

He didn't miss it. He couldn't see it. Big difference.

"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1992casey Milwaukee Brewers

1992casey

Verified Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted
Calling it a "bogus ruling" would indicate that the scorer made an error. One can complain about the scoring rule, but I can't see how one can complain about the scorer's decision.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

Become a Caretaker
×
×
  • Create New...