Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

2016 Arby Guesses?


Roderick

Recommended Posts

Those are the only ones, right?

 

Per Cot's, Thornberg, Schafer, and Matt Dominguez will also be first year arby eligible. Kintzler (if around, made $1.075M this year) and C. Jimenez ($575k) will be in year two arby with no one in year three. Note that Maldonado would be in his second arby year, but he's signed to a contract. He will be arby eligible in his third year in 2017.

 

I think Briggs' numbers are pretty good estimates. Thornberg should be right there with Smith, and Schafer and Dominguez shouldn't be very expensive if they're retained.

 

Looks like we have six guys (Braun, Lucroy, Rodriguez, Lind, Garza, Maldonado) under contract making $40.475M. Add in the arby guys (Peralta, Segura, Smith, Thornberg, Schafer, Jimenez) at around $12M and you have 12 guys at around $52.5M. Davis, Gennett, Nelson, Jeffress, Blazek, Perez, Jungmann, Knebel, Peterson, Santana, and anyone else from the minors are all league minimum.

 

We could very easily put together a roster around $60M next year, and even less if guys like Lind and Rodriguez are traded this offseason. It will be interesting to see how the Brewers operate this offseason.

"The most successful (people) know that performance over the long haul is what counts. If you can seize the day, great. But never forget that there are days yet to come."

 

~Bill Walsh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Peralta: $3.9 million

 

Segura: $2.6 million

 

Smith: $1.8 million

I think those are solid estimates. Peralta might be a tad high, but not much.

 

Obviously a nice (or naughty) September could changes things - especially Peralta and Segura.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Those are the only ones, right?

 

Per Cot's, Thornberg, Schafer, and Matt Dominguez will also be first year arby eligible. Kintzler (if around, made $1.075M this year) and C. Jimenez ($575k) will be in year two arby with no one in year three. Note that Maldonado would be in his second arby year, but he's signed to a contract. He will be arby eligible in his third year in 2017.

 

I think Briggs' numbers are pretty good estimates. Thornberg should be right there with Smith, and Schafer and Dominguez shouldn't be very expensive if they're retained.

 

Looks like we have six guys (Braun, Lucroy, Rodriguez, Lind, Garza, Maldonado) under contract making $40.475M. Add in the arby guys (Peralta, Segura, Smith, Thornberg, Schafer, Jimenez) at around $12M and you have 12 guys at around $52.5M. Davis, Gennett, Nelson, Jeffress, Blazek, Perez, Jungmann, Knebel, Peterson, Santana, and anyone else from the minors are all league minimum.

 

We could very easily put together a roster around $60M next year, and even less if guys like Lind and Rodriguez are traded this offseason. It will be interesting to see how the Brewers operate this offseason.

 

Baseball Reference says Thornburg will be eligible in 2017 for the first time. He was at 1.146 years of service coming into 2015. Perhaps if he had been on the roster all year he would have made it. Just a guess. He doesn't seem to have accumulated more than 1.5 or so years of service time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys who aren't locks to make the team out of spring training have zero leverage so the arby situation really doesn't apply. Either they'll be non-tendered and sign elsewhere or agree to a contract just barely above minimum salary. If for instance Thornburg got $1.2 million arbitration award, it actually hurts his chances of making the team. Same would go with Schafer, who could well be removed from the 40 man after the season anyway. They've essentially got the same guy in Wren at AAA who'll make the minimum.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peralta: $3.9 million

 

Segura: $2.6 million

 

Smith: $1.8 million

I think those are solid estimates. Peralta might be a tad high, but not much.

 

Obviously a nice (or naughty) September could changes things - especially Peralta and Segura.

 

Estrada got $3.9 million so I actually think I might be low if anything with Peralta. Peralta's record of accomplishment to date has been at least on par with Estrada's through 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Peralta: $3.9 million

 

Segura: $2.6 million

 

Smith: $1.8 million

I think those are solid estimates. Peralta might be a tad high, but not much.

 

Obviously a nice (or naughty) September could changes things - especially Peralta and Segura.

 

Estrada got $3.9 million so I actually think I might be low if anything with Peralta. Peralta's record of accomplishment to date has been at least on par with Estrada's through 2014.

Arbitration isn't strictly performance based. It's heavily weighted toward service time as well as your previous salary. So you want to compare Wily to other 1st time eligible guys.

 

Last year Wade Miley ended up making $3.67M (as part of a three year contract). And Garrett Richards made $3.2M. Those guys probably fit into the same profile as Peralta does coming into his first year of arby. Miley averaged 200 IP over his previous three years, probably a little better ERA and no injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Segura might end up with a little less because the Brewers would hold a lot of leverage in my opinion. I wouldn't want an arby hearing if I played the way he has the last two years. All Segura has to his name is a couple months three years ago...probably would not look good. $2.4mil?

 

Peralta likely to be in that $3.5mil range. Could go half a million either way depending on the finish.

 

Will Smith should be in the $1.7mil range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then based on those projections and what I'm seeing on Cot's contracts, the total payroll before any trades and/or FA signings would be in the neighborhood of $55M to $60M, correct? Am I missing something? Seems like that would give them a decent amount to spend on FA's if they choose to got that route. Although, I wonder if they will will shoot for a payroll of around $100M again, or if they will "scale back" a bit next year.

User in-game thread post in 1st inning of 3rd game of the 2022 season: "This team stinks"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a few others have pointed out in other threads, with a relatively low payroll, the possibility of taking on a bad contract or two in order to bring back value in trades becomes an option.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a few others have pointed out in other threads, with a relatively low payroll, the possibility of taking on a bad contract or two in order to bring back value in trades becomes an option.

It would be nice to see that kind of creative thinking from our front office.

Fan is short for fanatic.

I blame Wang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a few others have pointed out in other threads, with a relatively low payroll, the possibility of taking on a bad contract or two in order to bring back value in trades becomes an option.

 

It would be nice to see that kind of creative thinking from our front office.

 

No kidding. I was really impressed by Atlanta when they used that to bring Touki Toussaint into the organization. My thought then echoes yours, that Melvin would never do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a few others have pointed out in other threads, with a relatively low payroll, the possibility of taking on a bad contract or two in order to bring back value in trades becomes an option.

 

It would be nice to see that kind of creative thinking from our front office.

 

No kidding. I was really impressed by Atlanta when they used that to bring Touki Toussaint into the organization. My thought then echoes yours, that Melvin would never do that.

 

Doug Melvin wouldn't be the main decision maker in such an idea. That really would depend on the owners willingness to drop millions on a prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The FA market is so flooded with starting pitching that they could easily fill out the back end of the rotation with a low cost veteran (preferably a lefty) type who could be dealt later or moved to the pen to make room for one of the young guys. Hopefully Garza will regain enough form that he's marketable too, but if not, I'd just eat the remainder of his deal just like the Cubs did with Jackson this year. That way they wouldn't have to start the year committed one young guy presumably Davies at the expense of a half dozen or more others who are all also close to the majors. Let those guys battle it out and then go with the best at midseason. I personally think Hader and Lopez (though there are other strong candidates) are the two most likely guys to join Nelson, Peralta and Jungmann in the 2017 rotation and neither is quite ready to start 2016 in Milwaukee.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...