Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Max Scherzer Pitches No-Hitter...Misses Perfect Game by One Strike


splitterpfj

Max Scherzer was one strike from a perfect game - Tabata leaned into a pitch, with his padded elbow, reaching first in a 6-0 game. The next batter flied out, for the no-hitter.

 

Ken Rosenthal has just tweeted that the Pirates have released Tabata.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

I'm going to leave that last post up, even though it came from a fake account....no worries, a bunch of us fell for it.

 

In any case, that's exactly what happened, Tabata leaned into one that wasn't all that far inside.

 

Bush. League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dissapointing for Tabata to do that. One of the worst leaning HBPs I have ever seen. He had to come way down with an open elbow to get that on an elbow pad.

 

I totally support trying to the last out and not handing him the game...but that? No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He pretty clearly leaned into it. Call it bush league or whatever you want but the blame falls on the umpire for not calling him back.

 

This. I wonder if that's a play you can challenge as a manager. If it is, Williams should've done that assuming he had a challenge left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being that it's a judgement call I doubt you can challenge if a player attempted to get hit. That ump had a pretty clear view of it too since the catcher set up outside and left a huge hole for the ump too look through.

 

Sure but I would've at least asked the umps if it's reviewable or asked them to discuss it amongst themselves. What did they have to lose by just asking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member
Totally disagree, the batter should be doing everything he can to break up the perfect game (or that he would otherwise do in that situation). Otherwise what's the point, the achievement is meaningless. I have no problem with what Tabata did.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally disagree, the batter should be doing everything he can to break up the perfect game (or that he would otherwise do in that situation). Otherwise what's the point, the achievement is meaningless. I have no problem with what Tabata did.

 

 

Said perfectly. It's Tabata's job to get on base and Sherzer's job to get him out. Tabata won that battle. Cry me a river for those that thing some injustice was done.

"This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally disagree, the batter should be doing everything he can to break up the perfect game (or that he would otherwise do in that situation). Otherwise what's the point, the achievement is meaningless. I have no problem with what Tabata did.

 

Nobody is saying he shouldn't be doing whatever he can but he should've been called back by the umps for leaning into the pitch. That's not unprecedented and is part of the rule book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member
Nobody is saying he shouldn't be doing whatever he can but he should've been called back by the umps for leaning into the pitch. That's not unprecedented and is part of the rule book.

 

Well I can't speak for anyone in this thread, but a lot of people on social media are definitely mad at Tabata. Whether the umpire made a mistake in letting him take first base is a different question (though, when I watched the replay live it looked like maybe he brought his arm/elbow down but it didn't seem like he really leaned toward the plate).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just taken aback that we were as close as I will probably ever see anyone equal Johnny Vander Meer's record.

 

We were literally thisclose to seeing it if Gomez's "hit" doesn't fall last Sunday.

- - - - - - - - -

P.I.T.C.H. LEAGUE CHAMPION 1989, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2006, 2007, 2011 (finally won another one)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally disagree, the batter should be doing everything he can to break up the perfect game (or that he would otherwise do in that situation). Otherwise what's the point, the achievement is meaningless. I have no problem with what Tabata did.

 

Here, here. That is the same non-sense as bunting to break up a no hitter being bush. At point during a no hitter/perfect game are hitters just supposed to give up so the pitcher can get his achievement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally disagree, the batter should be doing everything he can to break up the perfect game (or that he would otherwise do in that situation). Otherwise what's the point, the achievement is meaningless. I have no problem with what Tabata did.

 

Here, here. That is the same non-sense as bunting to break up a no hitter being bush. At point during a no hitter/perfect game are hitters just supposed to give up so the pitcher can get his achievement?

 

No, it most certainly is not the same thing. Bunting for a hit, is getting a base hit if you can do it, leaning into a pitch, intentionally, is against the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Community Moderator
Count me among the group that did not like it. Break up a perfect game in the bottom of the ninth by swinging the bat (or taking a walk), not dropping your armored elbow into a breaking ball.
Not just “at Night” anymore.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally disagree, the batter should be doing everything he can to break up the perfect game (or that he would otherwise do in that situation). Otherwise what's the point, the achievement is meaningless. I have no problem with what Tabata did.

 

Here, here. That is the same non-sense as bunting to break up a no hitter being bush. At point during a no hitter/perfect game are hitters just supposed to give up so the pitcher can get his achievement?

 

No, it most certainly is not the same thing. Bunting for a hit, is getting a base hit if you can do it, leaning into a pitch, intentionally, is against the rules.

 

I agree it is against the rules but if a rule is never enforced is it still a rule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rule not only prohibits leaning into the strike zone, but also mandates that the batter must make an attempt to get out of the way of the pitch to be awarded first base.

 

The umpire could have easily simply called a ball without awarding first and been justified in doing so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If every ump for years and years has awarded the base in that situation, it is the rules otherwise we'd need to go back and question how many no hitters from the 90's with incredibly wide zones or how knows what else.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“You know,” Tabata said at his swarmed stall, appearing almost overwhelmed by the bombardment of questions. “I was just doing my job up there. That’s all. I knew he was throwing a perfect game, but I wanted to do my job. He’s one of the best pitchers in the game. But I’m trying to get on base.”

 

This right here. You play to win the game.

 

Anyone who has a problem with what he did should go back and make sure the second base was touched every time the Nats turned a double play. Once again, this all falls on the umpire. He's the one that didn't enforce the rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“You know,” Tabata said at his swarmed stall, appearing almost overwhelmed by the bombardment of questions. “I was just doing my job up there. That’s all. I knew he was throwing a perfect game, but I wanted to do my job. He’s one of the best pitchers in the game. But I’m trying to get on base.”

 

This right here. You play to win the game.

 

Anyone who has a problem with what he did should go back and make sure the second base was touched every time the Nats turned a double play. Once again, this all falls on the umpire. He's the one that didn't enforce the rule.

 

But you see the issue isn't that they didn't call the rule(because I have only seen it called once on Nyjer Morgan.) since no umpire calls it. The problem is Tabata went out of his way to make sure it hit him on an elbow pad. I have never seen someone try that hard to get hit.

 

I can agree that he was doing everything to get on base, but that doesn't make it right. I don't see anyone prancing around supporting steroid use because they are doing everything they can to win. Would you support intentionally injuring Trout so you have a better chance to beat the Angels? How about a cleats up slide into second? It isn't as severe or as frowned upon, but it is still wrong. It should still be looked at as the wrong thing to do.

 

If I was Max I wouldn't care though. If someone has to jump in front of my pitch just to get on base that is pretty awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...