Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

2014-05-09 Yankees (Tanaka) at Brewers (Gallardo), 7:10 PM CDT [Brewers lose, 5-3]


  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This team is just really bad right now. Hopefully "right now" is the operative part of that sentence.

 

 

Let's find out. Last season May was doomed due to an entire month of awful pitching. So now we have Pitching and we don't have the offense? Pitching wins championships no? So we should be better off regardless how poor we remain offensively....Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
This team is just really bad right now. Hopefully "right now" is the operative part of that sentence.

 

 

Let's find out. Last season May was doomed due to an entire month of awful pitching. So now we have Pitching and we don't have the offense? Pitching wins championships no? So we should be better off regardless how poor we remain offensively....Right?

 

 

Is there any empirical evidence that teams that are slanted more towards pitching than hitting are more likely to win?

 

Let's say team A scores 100 more runs than they allow, while scoring 750, and allowing 650, and team B scores 100 more runs than they allow, while scoring 675, and allowing 575. Is there ANY evidence that says team B is 'more' championship worthy??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verified Member
This team is just really bad right now. Hopefully "right now" is the operative part of that sentence.

 

 

Let's find out. Last season May was doomed due to an entire month of awful pitching. So now we have Pitching and we don't have the offense? Pitching wins championships no? So we should be better off regardless how poor we remain offensively....Right?

 

 

Is there any empirical evidence that teams that are slanted more towards pitching than hitting are more likely to win?

 

Let's say team A scores 100 more runs than they allow, while scoring 750, and allowing 650, and team B scores 100 more runs than they allow, while scoring 675, and allowing 575. Is there ANY evidence that says team B is 'more' championship worthy??

 

 

I don't know about "empirically," but logically, if you take your example to the extreme--say a team scores 200 runs, yet only gives up 20 runs the entire season, they are going to have an unbelievably good record--probably somewhere close to 145-17. Yet a team that scores 1000 runs and gives up 820 runs will have a far more difficult time reaching 145 wins....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...