Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

2013-04-26 Brewers (Burgos) at Dodgers (Beckett), 9:10 PM CDT [Brewers lose, 7-5]


  • Replies 258
  • Created
  • Last Reply

In that spot:

The Win Probability Inquirer

 

R/G__Inning_______________ Bases________Outs__Score Diff_____win%

4.50 Top of the seventh____Runner on third__1_____-1_______ 0.7554

4.50 Top of the seventh____Bases empty____2_____-2_______ 0.7926

 

 

You gain 4% with the squeeze, so it needs to work 97 / 100 times to be worth it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should have won this game. Damn. Calling a stupid bunt, pitching around Punto, and now this. Just not our night.
There are three things America will be known for 2000 years from now when they study this civilization: the Constitution, jazz music and baseball. They're the three most beautifully designed things this culture has ever produced. Gerald Early
Link to comment
Share on other sites

weeks not only needs to sit, but also make some changes. Take the yuni approach swing at the first pitch for next 30 ABS. i have always said he needs quit the waggle and raise his damn hands up. If he doens't do something soon, he could very well be on his way out of baseball. what the hell happened to this guy. was it batting him leadoff. did that really screw up him so much that he can't pick pitches to swing at. was it steriouds. seriously what happened, just sad.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that spot:

The Win Probability Inquirer

 

R/G__Inning_______________ Bases________Outs__Score Diff

4.50 Top of the seventh Runner on third 1 -1 0.7554

4.50 Top of the seventh Bases empty 2 -2 0.7926

 

 

You gain 4% with the squeeze, so it needs to work 97 / 100 times to be worth it

 

Is that assuming Segura would of been out at 1st?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that spot:

The Win Probability Inquirer

 

R/G__Inning_______________ Bases________Outs__Score Diff

4.50 Top of the seventh Runner on third 1 -1 0.7554

4.50 Top of the seventh Bases empty 2 -2 0.7926

 

 

You gain 4% with the squeeze, so it needs to work 97 / 100 times to be worth it

Wow. I knew it was a losing proposition in that spot, but that's ridic.

 

[sarcasm]But for the most part, it works for him.[/sarcasm]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that spot:

The Win Probability Inquirer

 

R/G__Inning_______________ Bases________Outs__Score Diff

4.50 Top of the seventh Runner on third 1 -1 0.7554

4.50 Top of the seventh Bases empty 2 -2 0.7926

 

 

You gain 4% with the squeeze, so it needs to work 97 / 100 times to be worth it

 

Is that assuming Segura would of been out at 1st?

 

Yss the second scenario is 2 outs no one on base 2 run lead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that spot:

The Win Probability Inquirer

 

R/G__Inning_______________ Bases________Outs__Score Diff

4.50 Top of the seventh Runner on third 1 -1 0.7554

4.50 Top of the seventh Bases empty 2 -2 0.7926

 

 

You gain 4% with the squeeze, so it needs to work 97 / 100 times to be worth it

 

Is that assuming Segura would of been out at 1st?

 

this can't be factoring the lineup either. two best hitters due up and squeezing against a hard sinker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that spot:

The Win Probability Inquirer

 

R/G__Inning_______________ Bases________Outs__Score Diff

4.50 Top of the seventh Runner on third 1 -1 0.7554

4.50 Top of the seventh Bases empty 2 -2 0.7926

 

 

You gain 4% with the squeeze, so it needs to work 97 / 100 times to be worth it

Wow. I knew it was a losing proposition in that spot, but that's ridic.

 

[sarcasm]But for the most part, it works for him.[/sarcasm]

 

And it assumes average hitters, not Seggy/Braun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with Weeks is what do you do? They already have Yuni and Gonzalez playing the corners, who else is there? They're not going to sit Weeks anyhow making 8 figures. For a game or two sure. And it surpasses understanding why RR hasn't done that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sigh.
There are three things America will be known for 2000 years from now when they study this civilization: the Constitution, jazz music and baseball. They're the three most beautifully designed things this culture has ever produced. Gerald Early
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that spot:

The Win Probability Inquirer

 

R/G__Inning_______________ Bases________Outs__Score Diff

4.50 Top of the seventh Runner on third 1 -1 0.7554

4.50 Top of the seventh Bases empty 2 -2 0.7926

 

 

You gain 4% with the squeeze, so it needs to work 97 / 100 times to be worth it

 

Is that assuming Segura would of been out at 1st?

 

Yss the second scenario is 2 outs no one on base 2 run lead

 

So it's flawed? I mean, what is it if Segura was on 1st with 1 out and a run in? That scenario is assuming Segura would of been out at 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with Weeks is what do you do? They already have Yuni and Gonzalez playing the corners, who else is there? They're not going to sit Weeks anyhow making 8 figures. For a game or two sure. And it surpasses understanding why RR hasn't done that.

 

You could ask Lucroy to drop a suitcase on his hand and call up Scooter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with Weeks is what do you do? They already have Yuni and Gonzalez playing the corners, who else is there? They're not going to sit Weeks anyhow making 8 figures. For a game or two sure. And it surpasses understanding why RR hasn't done that.

 

I don't care how much money he's making. If he's not performing at the level of even a passable Major Leaguer, he shouldn't be on the field. And right now, he's an automatic out at the plate, and an error waiting to happen in the field. How many balls have been hit to him, only to see the ball magically stick in his glove? He spent two weeks in the cleanup position, and for the year he has 3 RBI. He's awful at everything right now.

 

Salary should never be a concern, especially when there's a guy at AAA that's hitting .400. If you at least bring him up, maybe it lights a fire onder Rickie Weeks' butt. If not, let the kid have a shot. He's hit at every level of baseball, and he can't be any worse than Rickie Weeks. Who knows, he might be better. He'll certainly be much better at the fundamentals.

There are three things America will be known for 2000 years from now when they study this civilization: the Constitution, jazz music and baseball. They're the three most beautifully designed things this culture has ever produced. Gerald Early
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked you what you thought the break even point was and you ignored the question. The point is, the majority of the time, with a runner at 3rd with 1 out. 1 run will score without giving an out away. You also have a chance of scoring multiple runs. All managers know squeezes will work most of the time. Most are smart enough to know that isn't the point.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Is that assuming Segura would of been out at 1st?

 

Yss the second scenario is 2 outs no one on base 2 run lead

 

So it's flawed? I mean, what is it if Segura was on 1st with 1 out and a run in? That scenario is assuming Segura would of been out at 1st.

 

Its not flawed because that is very unlikely, a suicide bunter doesnt try to run at all and usually lays down a terrible bunt to the pitcher. Anyways your scenario raises it to 82%, 7% increase, so you are saying 94/100 times Segura would get the bunt down and be safe at first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Segura Would have been out at first. The 3B (Hairston) was 10 feet away from home plate. Would have beena routine out at 1B even with Segura's speed. (Because that's the other problem with the suicide, once the runner from 3rd takes off it gives away the play.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perverse way, the pen getting knocked around here softens the blow of the assumed outcome.

 

if segura hits in his AB, the universe changes. we never how the game would have played out. I take no solace in the pen blowing up. It may never have happened this way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked you what you thought the break even point was and you ignored the question. The point is, the majority of the time, with a runner at 3rd with 1 out. 1 run will score without giving an out away. You also have a chance of scoring multiple runs. All managers know squeezes will work most of the time. Most are smart enough to know that isn't the point.

 

So you responded with "you don't get it". Gotcha ya.

 

What is the break even point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Segura Would have been out at first. The 3B (Hairston) was 10 feet away from home plate. Would have beena routine out at 1B even with Segura's speed. (Because that's the other problem with the suicide, once the runner from 3rd takes off it gives away the play.)

 

The same guy who has 2 errors tonight? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...