Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Per ESPN: Braun Tests Positive, May Face 50 Game Suspension (Part 1)


wibadgers23
  • Replies 494
  • Created
  • Last Reply
What is "power factor" and how is it computed? To me it's pretty clear that the HR numbers have gone down since the steroid era. During that era is seemed as if you had to hit at least 50 HRs to win the HR title. Now the high HR numbers are closer to 40 HRs.
Power factor is Total Bases per hit.

The reason they use that instead of HR/AB or something like that is to eliminate non-hitting changes that may have caused something: Such as changing the size of the strike zone.

Once again, if steroids were slowly finding their way into the league, the power factor would go up gradually. Instead it jumped HUGELY midway through the 1993 season.

"I wasted so much time in my life hating Juventus or A.C. Milan that I should have spent hating the Cardinals." ~kalle8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is "power factor" and how is it computed? To me it's pretty clear that the HR numbers have gone down since the steroid era. During that era is seemed as if you had to hit at least 50 HRs to win the HR title. Now the high HR numbers are closer to 40 HRs.
Power factor is Total Bases per hit.

The reason they use that instead of HR/AB or something like that is to eliminate non-hitting changes that may have caused something: Such as changing the size of the strike zone.

Once again, if steroids were slowly finding their way into the league, the power factor would go up gradually. Instead it jumped HUGELY midway through the 1993 season.

I'm not sure where the "middle of 93" argument is coming from. In looking at the initial graph I see it spike at the beginning of 92 to the end of 94. To me a two year period of initial spike due to steroids would not seem unusual at all.

 

In your second graph what is "Adjusted Power Factor"?

User in-game thread post in 1st inning of 3rd game of the 2022 season: "This team stinks"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either way, everyone outside of Milwaukee will always perceive Braun as a juicer even if he's exonerated on the charges.

don't care, I just don't want Braun to be a crappy player after this or get suspended

I tried to log in on my iPad. Turns out it was an etch-a-sketch and I don't own an iPad. Also, I'm out of vodka.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The super high T level isn't Braun's big problem His big problem is the CIR/IRMS test which indicates exogenous testosterone in his system. Braun taking a second test, which turned up "clean", could actually work against him. It allows the testers to say "See. This is a normal guy. The only thing that could have triggered the first result is the ingestion of a PED."

 

There is a LOT more that needs to be known about this case. Braun's people need to get the best biochemists they can find on his side if they're going to attack this result, barring them already having a good argument on thier side for where something may have come from. The fact that they're already talking about "chain of custody" leads me to beleive they don't know where it came from and are looking to attck this thing any way they can. This will open them up to public perception by people unfamiliar with how hese things are adjudicated that he is just a doper trying to "get off on a technicality".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole thing is making me ill. While I still believe he will likely be suspended no matter what and we will never know the truth, it bugs me that this was leaked before it could all be handled behind the scenes. So many thing about this raise red flags, but we also don't know about the issues or questions that were raised in any of the other cases.

It also seems that there is conflicting info if any of these have been overturned. The everknowing Jeff Passan says his sources say no, while Jimmy Rollins tweets indicate that not to be true, and he was backed up by another source.

Unfortunately the likely outcome here is he is suspended and branded a cheater and we may never know what really happened. Everyone will have to form their own opinions of him from that point on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure where the "middle of 93" argument is coming from. In looking at the initial graph I see it spike at the beginning of 92 to the end of 94. To me a two year period of initial spike due to steroids would not seem unusual at all.

 

Sounds about right. To me, the steroid era truly began in '93 during Canseco's first full year in Texas. Letting Canseco out of Oakland truly opened the Pandora's Box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Unfortunately the likely outcome here is he is suspended and branded a cheater and we may never know what really happened. Everyone will have to form their own opinions of him from that point on.

This is the key thing to remember. The testers really don't care about guilt or innocence. They care about defending the test result. They have to do this; because to concede even once that they have messed up puts the entire system at risk in their mind. If one athlete is allowed to beat them, all the dirty cheats will latch on to that result and then we won't be able to catch any of them, or so the slipperly slope argument goes.

They disingenuously argue that this means they are completely impartial; they are only protecting the science for the good of us all. That is, to put it politely, [expletive deleted]. They know the ramifications of their accusations. There is an attitude at play here that they are the white hats, protecting us all from the depredations of liars and cheats. And while there are a lot of people doing a lot of good to help combat PED use, too many have become overzealous.

No matter how this thing turns out, ther will be room to beleive that Braun is indeed innocent. Everyone who espouses that position will be called naive idiots by the cynical know-it-alls who don't really know much at all.

 

 

(edit: language --1992)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big, unquestionable scandal here -- as of now -- is that word of this affair leaked. I hope the Commissioner's Office is planning a full-on, publicly accountable investigation into the circumstances surrounding the leak, because it's completely unacceptable. Braun's reputation is irreparably tainted, whatever the facts ultimately turn out to be. I don't blame the news organizations for reporting what they had, assuming that what they had satisfied journalistic best practices. That's their job. But if the leak came out of the Commissioner's Office, then some heads had better be getting ready to roll.

 

As for Braun, I don't have any idea what to think; there are too many conflicting reports. We seem to have good reason to believe that he failed a test that triggers a suspension. Based on that, I think we need (for whatever value any of us places in our discussions here) to be talking about LF options. But I don't have any greater confidence than that in what I know.

 

Also -- special thanks to pebadger for some incredibly thoughtful and informative posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, greg.

 

I agree that the issue of the leak has not been getting enough attention, especially in terms of where to leak came from on the source end. In a vacuum, it's hard to fault ESPN for running with what they had. That said, from an ethical standpoint, I have a real problem with this being the same outfit that sat on information for YEARS involving potential criminal liability in the Bernie Fine matter, but yet could not wait a few weeks to publish the one-sided, clearly agenda-driven leaks by multiple sources regarding a matter that had yet to be fully adjudicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like this could take a while. Tom H latest post. Sounds like MLB is shocked by this too. Tom has done a great job with this
I'd have to disagree here. He's once again late to the party and only getting sound bites cause he's the local guy.
He is "late" to the party because he is checking with his sources. He has been all over this since word got out. What type of story was he supposed to run at first? Should have he just copied what ESPN said?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, greg.

 

I agree that the issue of the leak has not been getting enough attention, especially in terms of where to leak came from on the source end. In a vacuum, it's hard to fault ESPN for running with what they had. That said, from an ethical standpoint, I have a real problem with this being the same outfit that sat on information for YEARS involving potential criminal liability in the Bernie Fine matter, but yet could not wait a few weeks to publish the one-sided, clearly agenda-driven leaks by multiple sources regarding a matter that had yet to be fully adjudicated.

I was thinking the exact same thing last night. They sit on the Fine thing but ran this like they did
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure where the "middle of 93" argument is coming from. In looking at the initial graph I see it spike at the beginning of 92 to the end of 94. To me a two year period of initial spike due to steroids would not seem unusual at all.

 

In your second graph what is "Adjusted Power Factor"?

The actual numbers (which are on the site I linked to, I believe, http://steroids-and-baseball.com/ ) show that the jump occurred somewhere mid '93 to 94.

Can't find the numbers there, but from THT, HR% rates by season:

1988	2.7%
1989	2.6%
1990	2.8%
1991	2.9% 1992	2.5%
1993	3.1%
1994	3.7%
1994	3.7%
1995	3.6%
1996	3.9%
1997	3.7%
1998	3.7%

The second graph is just the years lined up side by side, with the discontinuity edited out. No steady increase in power numbers (as if, more and more guys started using steroids), just one massive jump in a 1 year period.

Here is an article on the CT scans of balls from Aaron's era and Bond's era.

"I wasted so much time in my life hating Juventus or A.C. Milan that I should have spent hating the Cardinals." ~kalle8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken Rosenthal's piece, while even-handed with respect to Braun himself, may be one of the dumbest things I've ever read when taken as a whole. One the one hand he says that Braun may well be cleared. He parlays this observation into the conclusion that this incident proves that baseball will never be clean.

 

What?

 

http://msn.foxsports.com/...e-baseball-is-not-121011

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if anyone posted this, but I found a few tweets by Jimmy Rollins to be pretty interesting:

 

Rollins (JimmyRollins11): I hope Braunies initial test is not upheld....

Random Dude(StlCards314): nobody's ever had it overturned. Just upsets me that players alwasy deny first, then apologize and admit much later.

Rollins: never been overturned is "technically" correct. I know of a case that no one will hear about.

 

Doesn't really mean anything, but I found it an interesting POV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...