Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

2012 8th Inning Guy


Whether you agree or disagree with the idea of an 8th inning guy it seems pretty clear with Loe's usage pattern early and then the success that the team had with K-Rod in that role later in the year that RRR definitely subscribes to the theory. That said, who gets the job in 2012?

I'd love to bring Saito back but with his age/health I'd rather count on him for the 7th when he is able to pitch. Who is out there as a free agent that can be had on a one year deal that isn't going to get a closer's job? Nathan? Francisco? Discuss...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

The Brewers were rumored to have interest in Francisco. I think it's too early to tell how much money will be available to spend on the pen though. If there is some money out there Francisco, or someone else could be a target. If not, it might just be Saito and in-house options. Hawkins is also a possibility to be re-signed, but he'll be more expensive than Saito. Kintzler is an intriguing in-house option if he can bounce back from injury.
Feel free to follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/#!/ItsFunkeFresh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't mind seeing the Brewers trade for Huston Street. I hear he's available.
That would be nice. Good stuff, and his career WHIP has been consistently low, and he's only 28. The thing is that he is scheduled to make $7.5 million next season. In 2013 he will make $9 million, though there's a $500,000 buyout. I think that salary explains why the Rockies are open to trading him.
The Paul Molitor Statue at Miller Park: http://www.facebook.com/paulmolitorstatue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor

I think Melvin loved having a 'second closer' on the team.

 

I wouldn't be shocked if he splurged on a a guy who's been a successful closer, such as Street (obviously a trade), Lidge, Capps, Nathan, Francisco, Broxton.

 

I'd love to have a guy like Broxton or Lidge - guys coming off injuries but potentially really good - come in on a one year deal and let them set up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doug will wait until the market cools down and see who is left. Saito isn't able to do back-to-back days or more than one inning, so it won't be him, unless they just go with a group. Francisco was a good bet, but so many teams need a closer, he looks to get a 9th inning job. A guy recovering from injury, like Broxton, or Capps, looking to reestablish himself as a closer, would be good bets.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern is that Roenicke will again look at Kameron Loe as a credible 8th inning option if he doesn't a very clear and solid 8th inning guy...

 

 

Dear god I hoe not. I don't think he's that dumb.

We're talking about a manager who started Mark Kotsay in CF in a playoff game and who continued to let Loe pitch to LHB's. He also continued to use Loe in the 8th inning until we aquired K-Rod. The only way to guarantee that RR won't consider Loe in the set-up spot is to not resign Loe or to give RR such a better & obvious option for a set-up man that Loe wouldn't be considered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broxton is #1 target for me. Street has been a favorite of mine since he was lighting it up as a 3rd baseman/ Closer for Texas in their powerhouse days.

 

Rogers and Braddock would make up the dream 8th inning if potential met results. But not banking on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Memory is fuzzy at best...that's why the "I saw it with my own eyes" guys are wrong almost all the time.

 

Loe vs. LH---.306/.384

Krod vs, LH--.347/.429

 

I'm sure Loe did have a couple bad games. So did Verlander. Not sure what the point is. Axford wasn't perfect either, just superb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Memory is fuzzy at best...that's why the "I saw it with my own eyes" guys are wrong almost all the time.

 

Loe vs. LH---.306/.384

Krod vs, LH--.347/.429

 

I'm sure Loe did have a couple bad games. So did Verlander. Not sure what the point is. Axford wasn't perfect either, just superb.

I'm going to call small sample on that one, despite that the fact that LHBs had a 90 point better OPS against Loe than RHBs in '11... career wise, LHBs have an .837 OPS against Loe, as opposed to a .675 OPS for RHBs. I remain convinced that Loe should very rarely face LHBs, certainly not in a close game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

an interesting flyer would be Andrew Miller from the Red Sox....he's out of options & supposedly on the market....

 

deal for him & start him out in long relief....maybe by midseason he'll earn a better role such as setup man, the dude has the talent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Memory is fuzzy at best...that's why the "I saw it with my own eyes" guys are wrong almost all the time.

 

Loe vs. LH---.306/.384

Krod vs, LH--.347/.429

 

I'm sure Loe did have a couple bad games. So did Verlander. Not sure what the point is. Axford wasn't perfect either, just superb.

I'm going to call small sample on that one, despite that the fact that LHBs had a 90 point better OPS against Loe than RHBs in '11... career wise, LHBs have an .837 OPS against Loe, as opposed to a .675 OPS for RHBs. I remain convinced that Loe should very rarely face LHBs, certainly not in a close game

The problem with Loe is not so much his splits but his inconsistency. When he's on his sinker is one nasty pitch and good enough to get hitters out from either side. In fact he can look so dominant it can make a manager feel very good about using him late. But when he's off, well he's usually way off and you can't get him out of there quickly enough and no lead is safe. It's that inconsistency that ended up costing him his late inning role.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with Loe is not so much his splits but his inconsistency. When he's on his sinker is one nasty pitch and good enough to get hitters out from either side. In fact he can look so dominant it can make a manager feel very good about using him late. But when he's off, well he's usually way off and you can't get him out of there quickly enough and no lead is safe. It's that inconsistency that ended up costing him his late inning role.

 

This makes me wonder about the competency of our bullpen coach and bullpen catcher. They should have been able to see if Loe was on or not and let Roenicke know. The hitters could sure tell when Loe's sinker wasn't working.

 

Loe is a valueable tool when used correctly. When not used correctly, he really hurt our team last year. Tabbing him as the "no questions asked 8th inning guy" is using him incorrectly. The Truth hit it on the head that we either need to cut Loe or bring in someone who can no doubt be a better option for Roenicke to use as the "8th inning guy." Plus, if Loe is due $2.8MM in arby, as MLBTR has suggested, then I don't think he's worth that to this year's Brewers (who can't pony up $5MM for a starting SS).

"The most successful (people) know that performance over the long haul is what counts. If you can seize the day, great. But never forget that there are days yet to come."

 

~Bill Walsh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even feel like Loe should be on the team next year, at least not for what he's due in arbitration. You're going to be paying him close to what you paid Saito this year, and that's far too much. He's a good groundball pitcher that shouldn't be used in many high leverage situations. That type of guy screams league minimum to me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...