Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Bill Hall traded to Mariners for P Ruben Flores


Invader3K
  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Am I missing something here. I read the posts but could have missed someone else bringing up this point. MA already turned down a Harang for Hardy deal before the deadline because of the salary implications next year. If we cannot get Harang for Hardy how could we ever get him for Hall. Like I said if I missed this I apologize.

 

On top of this good luck in Seattle Bill, he just didn't have it anymore and when you have a guy on your team making that kind on money that is best case 3rd on the depth chart he has to go.

 

Even some salary relief at this point is a great get, saving that cash is like getting Kentrail Davis for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gord Ash:

...when you're in this situation when you designate a player for assignment and you're a day removed from releasing that player...

 

 

(and we had no choice but to put ourselves under this time pressure by DFAing Hall, because we needed both Iribarren and Bourgeois on the MLB roster NOW, not in three weeks...those two players were the key to our strategy for making a run at the playoffs.) http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/ohwell.gif

 

 

I still don't get what you think would've been gained by keeping Hall on the roster, or what you think the Brewers might've gotten in return if Hall had just gone through waivers.

 

Hall's a swell guy and very athletic, but as someone said, he was as useful to the '09 Brewers as a paper weight. If every other GM hadn't figured that out, someone would've offered us something to take him off our hands some time ago -- probably back when he hadn't fully proven that he was never going to improve enough to matter in Milwaukee ever again.

 

Jack Z. needed an IF and simply did DM a favor to give up an arm (of questionable merit) and minimal salary relief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MA already turned down a Harang for Hardy deal before the deadline because of the salary implications next year.

 

AFAIK this was reported, but I don't know how much it should be believed. When I read that, I just assumed that the message got garbled by the time it got to the writer. I highly doubt that Hardy for Harang was turned down because of money. I very much believe it was turned down because the Brewers hope to get something better than Harang back this offseason when they trade Hardy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I missing something here. I read the posts but could have missed someone else bringing up this point. MA already turned down a Harang for Hardy deal before the deadline because of the salary implications next year. If we cannot get Harang for Hardy how could we ever get him for Hall. Like I said if I missed this I apologize.
Hall's salary is considerably higher than Hardy's, so we wouldn't be increasing payroll as much if we were to trade Hall. Its essentially a swap of bad contracts (though I don't think Harang's contract is that bad, personally).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can almost guarantee that Hall was put through waivers and I would imagine no one claimed him. I would also bet my salary that they would have gotten the same deal regardless if it was a waiver deal or a DFA. No team was going to take on his salary or if they did give up anything in return for it.

 

Since Flores will be a FA anyways, I say bring him up and see what he can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff Sackmann revisited Hall's initial deal over at THT.

 

I pretty much agree with him, the deal was a total no-brainer at the time, considering Hall's age, and how many different positions he could play. It would've been impossible to predict that his bat would completely disappear.

"I wasted so much time in my life hating Juventus or A.C. Milan that I should have spent hating the Cardinals." ~kalle8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't get what you think would've been gained by keeping Hall on the roster, or what you think the Brewers might've gotten in return if Hall had just gone through waivers.

 

 

I have no idea what they might have gotten by going the waiver route, but DFAing him certainly put them in a worse negotiating position. What was gained by DFAing him rather than going through waivers? I was being sarcastic, but really that is all that changed, isnt it...we have either Iribarren or Bourgeois 3 weeks earlier than what would have been the worst case scenario (ie. no trade) had they gone with waivers.

 

The Brewers, via Gord Ash, are saying that the deadline pressure was a factor in what they were able to get. Several posters have said the same thing. The Brewers created this pressure themselves for no good reason.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, at the time the Brewers were considering themselves still "in it", and hence the move was partly designed to kick the team in the pants and hopefully get them playing a bit better. That part clearly didn't work, but I don't think it was totally without merit.
The Paul Molitor Statue at Miller Park: http://www.facebook.com/paulmolitorstatue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Flores will be a FA anyways, I say bring him up and see what he can do.
Wait, so we could lose him after this season already?

 

Yeah, apparently we got a rental to help the Manatees in their playoffs.

 

Or could it possibly be that he was window dressing, so the fans could be told that we got a pitching prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cincy should've wanted Hall since that is one of his better places to hit.

 

The main reason I am disappointed was Melvin publicly making the announcement of "working on something". It's like his comments of at the deadline of almost getting the big fish. Why make either comment?

 

So which one do we believe? This is why I have no faith in where this team is headed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Brewers first mistake was bringing Hall back up after only 3 days in AAA, or whatever it was. If he had gone down and hit well there for a couple of weeks, his trade value might have at least gotten to the point where teams would have been willing to take on a little more salary than what Seattle did.

 

Prematurely bringing Hall back up to play RF, and then "making a example of him" during the blood-letting frenzy (effectively putting him in a position to become a free agent in a matter of days) was the nail in the coffin of completely destroying any chance of getting better salary relief or a decent return for Hall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way things went down the Brewers weren't going to get anything more for him than they did.

 

However, the situation was handled in the least best possible way, if you're sending a player down, then keep the player down until he figures it out or you decide he's done. Why send a player (3B) down for less than week to recall him to play RF, to DFA him a week later? It's as silly as recalling Parra because they needed a pitcher instead of letting him work all the way through his issues, to bring him back after 1 good start still puzzles me.

"You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation."

- Plato

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something."

- Plato

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, the situation was handled in the least best possible way, if you're sending a player down, then keep the player down until he figures it out or you decide he's done. Why send a player (3B) down for less than week to recall him to play RF, to DFA him a week later?
Well, to be fair, that was prompted by Corey's appendectomy.

 

But yeah, why not bring up Bourgeois at the time instead and let Hall work on his swing in AAA to be trade bait for off-season? And like jeffyscott said, now they had this artificial deadline to try and get something/anything for him.

 

I'm not on the Fire DM bandwagon quite yet, but this was a bit of a head-scratcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Igawa has no value to the Yankees and is owed $9 million over the next two years. I was just saying that I think a trade like that made sense for both teams.

 

Hall is only on the books for one mroe year and Igawa is terrible. Why trade one year of crap for two years of crap when you can get rid of all the crap and save some money to boot?

 

I think Jack Z did Melvin a favor, paying as much as he did.

 

The only way Jack could make sure to get Hall at that price was to trade for him. If Hall got to free agency he could have went anywhere he wanted to for as much as anyone was willing to pay. Jack was doing what he felt was in the best interest of his club not doing anyone a favor.

 

Teams could have just waited a few more days and signed him for nothing.

 

Except all the team who are interested in him could do the same.

 

 

The Brewers, via Gord Ash, are saying that the deadline pressure was a factor in what they were able to get. Several posters have said the same thing. The Brewers created this pressure themselves for no good reason.

 

Some of those same posters wanted to DFA him along time ago. They created this pressure because, unlike fans, they are obligated to do everything they can to stay in the pennant race. At the time they simply did what they felt was necessary to keep their slim hopes alive. I would not be a fan of the team if they did not take this approach. It's ok for me to thin they are out of it but not the team itself. That is quitting. The only time I ever stopped watching this team was in 02 because they quit. I do not think I am alone in thinking that way. I think most fans can stomach a bad year but will not tolerate quitting. See the Pirates for example of what happens when management quits on the season to early.

 

 

Or could it possibly be that he was window dressing, so the fans could be told that we got a pitching prospect.

 

The league frowns on something for nothing deals. It may have had to do with getting league approval for the deal.

There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 weeks ago - "Good riddance - he's a bum. If we get a bag of balls for him I'm happy"!

 

Today - "What? Have they forgotten his 35 homers? The man's a stud, for pete's sake".

 

I mean, did anyone honestly think we'd get a Harang/Arroyo for Bill Hall? Cincy might be stupid, but they're not crazy!

 

"Hey, Walt, how 'bout, no, hear me out here, buddy. How 'bout you take Bill Hall - you know how much he's hurt you in the past, and we get, oh, I don't know, some scrub pitcher, like, maybe that funny-face Harang guy? Then - and this is the part you'll like - you keep paying for Harang and we'll let you pay Bill Hall's salary also, cos we like you?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today - "What? Have they forgotten his 35 homers? The man's a stud, for pete's sake".

Nobody said anything like that. The biggest problem most people have, is that the way management handled things over the past month with Hall has minimized his trade value rather than maximizing it.

 

With as little room for error as the Brewers have right now and into the immediate future, I would hope they can find a way to be significantly more shrewd with their future dealings, although I'm losing confidence in Melvin by the minute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say it was a stupid move to DFA him. You can't tell me that he didn't have some value. He could play at least 5 positions, and he has some track record of hitting the ball. There are plenty of worse '25th men' in the league. For Pete's sake, we aren't too far from the days of guys like Trent Durrington.

 

Doesn't make a bit of sense to get rid of him and be on the hook for $10 million when they need a utility guy anyway. If they DFA'd anyone, it should have been Suppan. Why does he keep getting chances? He has hurt the team a lot more than Hall did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a point of comparison, when Lugo was DFAed by the Red Sox, they paid all of his remaining salary and got Chris Duncan back in return. If I'm given a hypothetical choice between $1.3M and Chris Duncan, I am comfortable with taking the cash.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...