Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Trade Koskie


endaround

Recommended Posts

Maybe if they planned on moving Braun to the OF, or else we'd just be delaying moving Hall to the OF by a year. Since everyone is speculating that Braun will be up sometime this year, then what? Move Hall to the OF then? They've already told Hall that he'd have a permanent position this year. Why prolong his OF growing pains by a year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hall is going to be our CF. We can argue that all we want. Those seems to be the facts.

 

Braun is going to be a 3B. It might make sense that Hall plays third (since he already can) and Braun plays outfield - but just as they stuck with Weeks at second, the Brewers seem determined to keep this as well.

 

IF (big IF) Koskie is fully healthy and has some trade value, it might be a good time to move him. Braun will be in the bigs sooner than later - though his defense will hurt. And Graffy can hold down 3B in the meantime.

 

Best bet - Koskie gets trade midseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Katuluu is right. For every reason that would seem from the outside to make the Brewers & Twins a match in the Koskie department, the Twins see Punto as their everyday 3B.

 

Melvin, Yost, & Co. also noted repeatedly throughout the 2nd half that Koskie's absence from the lineup made the Brewers a lesser team in ways that stood out to them far more than his stats would make it seem like was the case.

 

It seems like part of the reason Koskie was brought in is because he's a respectable offensive player and a stellar defensive player at an uber-discounted salary, which makes him the perfect guy at 3B for a couple years until Braun is ML-ready. Oh, and he's a great team-first guy, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Brewers truely intend to keep Braun at thirdbase,keeping Koskie is pretty much ideal.Koskie is a cheap and solid player to bridge the gap for this year while Braun matures as a player.

 

It will be interesting to see what the team does if Koskie has yet another fairly significant injury and Braun is raking in AAA,but still struggling defensively.Given Koskie's long injury history,him going down at some point should almost be expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the ideal situation would be to bring braun up in mid season and trade koskie at the trade deadline. if koskie is healthy and productive through july, he will have some trade value. I believe koskie also has a very big option for 2007 that kicks in with 450 plate appearances. i know the brewers will not want koskie to reach that goal as they could not afford to pay him that salary next year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone have any idea what Koskie's physical condition is right now? A concussion can be a pretty tough thing to come back from sometimes. It also probably reduces his trade value, at least somewhat.

 

I'm not against trying to trade him, but it would all depend on what the Twins, or any other team, would be willing to give up, obviously.

The Paul Molitor Statue at Miller Park: http://www.facebook.com/paulmolitorstatue
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I believe koskie also has a very big option for 2007 that kicks in with 450 plate appearances.
Corey's $6.5 million 2008 option will vest if he has 507 plate appearances in 2007.

 

His contract calls for the option to vest if he reaches a total of 1,200 Plate Appearances 2005-07 or 600 Plate Appearances in 2006 or 2007. With 693 PA over the past two seasons, the 600 PA part would now be moot.

 

Additionally, if his team really decides it wants him, the option is also a team option.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Additionally, if his team really decides it wants him, the option is also a team option.

 

so let me get this right. If he is durable, there is a team option, likely with a buyout if declined. If he isn't durable, there likely is no payment to let him walk? Is that what you are saying here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team option can be exercised by Koskie's team no matter what happens during the 2007 season. If the option is declined, there's a $500,000 buyout.

 

The option automatically kicks in if Corey reaches 507 plate appearances in 2007.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brewer Fanatic Contributor
Quote:
so let me get this right. If he is durable, there is a team option, likely with a buyout if declined. If he isn't durable, there likely is no payment to let him walk? Is that what you are saying here?

 

I think it's a team option that automatically kicks in if Koskie reaches the 507 plate appearances. If he doesn't reach the number, the team can, if it wants, pick up the option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[ I like koskie, but i believe if he approaches those 500 atbats, he'll be traded just like bell was traded to the brewers last year. I doubt very highly teh brewers will allow koskie to reach his option totals. ]

 

I would doubt that would happen. Teams when making trades are fully aware of incentive clauses, and would shy away from that deal unless the Brewers picked up some money for 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I like koskie, but i believe if he approaches those 500 atbats, he'll be traded just like bell was traded to the brewers last year. I doubt very highly teh brewers will allow koskie to reach his option totals.
I agree with Al that Corey probably won't reach 507 plate appearances. But I don't want it to happen because the Brewers are intentionally trying to limit his AB totals. If it somehow turns out that it's best for the team that he plays, so be it. A manager shouldn't be put into the position of having to determine playing time based on incentive clauses.

 


I would doubt that would happen. Teams when making trades are fully aware of incentive clauses, and would shy away from that deal unless the Brewers picked up some money for 2008.
Given the contracts handed out this winter, if things go well for Corey this season, he could very well be worth the money his option calls for.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those options are a no win situation, if the Brew does not play Koskie everyday if healthy, his agent will cry foul and they can file a grievance etc...

 

Just don't negotiate that stuff into contracts ( I know the Brew didn't do the contract), that being said Koskie is a HUGE bargain if he can stay healthy, however, thats a big IF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see a no-win situation at all.

 

Nobody whined last year when Corey was platooned.

 

Given the state of contracts this winter, if he earns 507 plate appearances, he deserves the guaranteed 2008 money.

 

The only way Corey's team loses is if he plays poorly, yet defaults into vesting the option because platoon options are injured or fail.

That’s the only thing Chicago’s good for: to tell people where Wisconsin is.

[align=right]-- Sigmund Snopek[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...