Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

How is this team 31-22


Trowekamp

It does to me. Last year, his first full season, he was 79th of 88 "qualifying" pitchers in WHIP (tied with Suppan).

 

You use only WHIP to decide if a player did well or not? It seems more like you are just cherry picking to me.

 

He had an above average K rate, below average walk rate and average HR rate. His BABIP bad but K rate and walk rate are the stats you want to focus on with a limited sample size (one season). His FIP was 4.16, and his ERA was 4.39. Anyone can define "disappointed" as they see sit but Parra was an average pitcher, when you look at the big pitcher. Not bad for a guy's rookie season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I think describing Parra as an average pitcher last season would be reasonably accurate. That's why I questioned before this season started why so many felt he would suddenly ascend to being a #2 pitcher behind Gallardo. For one thing, there wasn't much of a track record to base that on to begin with, other than him "having good stuff." Wanting a guy to do well is one thing, but expecting huge leaps in performance between seasons is usually a recipe for disappointment.

 

Maybe the pressure has gotten to Parra and that's why he's struggling. I couldn't know for sure.

The Paul Molitor Statue at Miller Park: http://www.facebook.com/paulmolitorstatue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A #2 pitcher in baseball has around a 4 ERA, Parra had a 4.39 ERA and a better track record in the minors, I don't see how it was a leap. Anyway it is too early to judge any of our pitchers, I would think people have learned that over the past few years by now. Last year at this time we were crying for Bush to be DFA'd, three years ago at this time Capuano was our ace before faltering in the second half. Parra could easily go on a run and end up with an ERA down around 4 still or he could blow up even more and be in the minors by the end of the year, it is just too early to tell.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least with Bush it was obvious something was wrong, his velocity was way down early. Still can't believe he didn't a file a complaint agaisnt the Brewers and got sent down instead of going on the DL because obviously something was physically wrong even if it was just a dead arm.

 

As for Parra, looking at his pitch data, it looks like they are making him a fastball changeup pitcher. All his off speed stuff is down except for change up which is way up. He has also lost some velocity of his fastball and 2 mph on his splitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem is he is always behind in the count so he cannot go to the off speed stuff. Parra won't be 'fixed' until he gets his control together. He did throw 67 of 100 pitches for strikes this last start so there is at least a little bit positive about it even if it was mostly negative.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That game is going to skew his stats all year. I know we can't ignore the game, but he probably would have been pulled 5 runs earlier if our bullpen wasn't burned out. It was a terrible time to have a rain delay, which I think contributed at least a little to his poor pitching.

Fan is short for fanatic.

I blame Wang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That game is going to skew his stats all year. I know we can't ignore the game, but he probably would have been pulled 5 runs earlier if our bullpen wasn't burned out. It was a terrible time to have a rain delay, which I think contributed at least a little to his poor pitching.
True but if you pull the outliers (best and worst game) he is still disappointing to me. The lack of strikes as Ennder mentioned is concerning. I just think a couple of months in the bullpen to build confidence in going after hitters and being more agressive could be good for him and keep him fresh for the second half and give McClung a chance to see if he can leverage what he has learned in the pen. If this team gets into the playoffs it needs pitchers who can miss bats (Gallardo, McLung, and Parra) more than pitchers who don't (Bush, Suppan, and Looper)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, you can't take it out, but it adds .225 points of ERA if Parra pitches 200 innings. I think it is a good example of how ERA, even over a whole season, can be misleading. I think that most people would agree that 0.25 points of ERA is pretty drastic. Even if he pitched 4.5 ERA the rest of the year , he would be at 4.72 instead now. He took one for the team. I am not saying he has pitched well, just pointing out how drastically that one extra inning is going to affect his stats.

Fan is short for fanatic.

I blame Wang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...