Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Harden being shopped


According to this article. Harden Article

 

Now the guy has ridiculously good top of the rotation stuff when he is healthy. However his value right now is probably at an all time low (which is why its so strange that Beane would be looking to sell.)

 

Since seeing this article, I've been having visions of a rotation of:

Sheets

Capuano

Harden

Suppan

Bush

 

So, anyway, what do you think it would cost us to bring in Harden? Villenueva + Jackson? More? Discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

He's signed through 2009. Any package with prospects not named Gallardo or Braun, I would do (including of course a Mench/Gross/Gwynn-type player).

 

It would be sweet if they could time such a trade with Braun being called up and dealing off Graffanino to open a hole for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adding Harden, as Brian mentioned (no trading of YoGa or Braun), would be huge.

 

I wouldn't want him for the rotation though --- but to replace CoCo after 2007. Arm issues? Move him to the back of the pen now, as opposed to after his 4th & 5th overuse injuries

Stearns Brewing Co.: Sustainability from farm to plate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's true, Beane's gonna want at least Inman, Vargas, one of Capellan/Sarfate/Villanueva, and probbly Irabarren or Perez. If he'd do it, I'd do Harden and a throw-in type prospect for Inman, Capellan, and the Hurricane, but he'll probably want Villy or Vargas too. That's probably too much.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inman and Vargas is too much for one player.

 

Probably not worth the risk, I agree, but it would be interesting. You'd have to overpay slightly to nab Harden now, but man, that guy is filthy when he's healthy. But you never really know when that's going to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harden is awesome when he's healthy, but I'd be wary of giving up Inman and Villanueva for a guy who's been out frequently as of late.

 

I say that now, but if they actually pulled this off I'd probably freak out with joy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Inman and Vargas is too much for one player.

 

Considering I would do Inman for Harden and Harden would knock Vargas out of the rotation, I would make a trade surrounding those players in a second.

 

It instantly improves our team this year (considering Harden would have to pass a physical to complete the trade) and it would soften the blow in the case that we have to trade or lose Sheets down the road (possibly as soon as next year). Even without Sheets we'd be sitting pretty in the next couple years with a rotation consisting of:

 

Capuano

Harden

Suppan

Bush

Gallardo

 

...not to mention Villanueva, Jackson, and Parra should all be viable rotation candidates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually don't think we should be trying to trade for Harden. I'd rather keep a balanced system so we have guys replacing the guys we lose. Packaging a few of our better prospects together for a big league pitcher will just leave us with less players to replace more.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm as big of a Will Inman fan as there is. However, holding onto high A pitching prospects shouldn't really be a hard and fast rule. That's a long ways away from the big leagues. I guess I'm not sure that I'd trade him for Harden, though. The Brewers would have to be pretty certain that he was completely healhy... but why would the A's trade a completely healty Rich Harden?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
The Brewers would have to be pretty certain that he was completely healhy... but why would the A's trade a completely healty Rich Harden?

Exactly. The A's won't trade him if he's healthy, but no one will trade for him before he proves he's healthy. I highly doubt he gets traded mid-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am about as big of an Inman fan there is, but if we could obtain Harden for Inman, and the player that he would ultimately unseat (Vargas), and a player who doesn't have an affinity for our first place team (Latin Cappy), I find it hard to pass up. And with the Canadian ties, as mentioned, it definitely has me salivating. Sheets and Harden could both challenge for the Cy while Cappy leads the NL in quality starts. I'd even expand it to go...

 

Jenkins

Vargas

Braun

 

for

 

Harden

Chavez

the Douche

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suppose you go to Vegas with $500 to gamble with. Your wife will kill you if you lose more than that. If you lose the $500, you are going to be pretty upset - but you could live with it.

 

Along comes that last day - and you are $1000 in the hole. You are in trouble. You could bail out now - explain to your wife that you messed up, and take your beating like a man.

 

Instead, you get an extra $500 and put it all on one hand of black jack. You win - your wife is content. You lose - you better pack your bags.

 

Thats how I feel about Harden. We already have a lot of salary tied up in a pitcher who has had health problems. Thats tough for any small market team. If you take on another one - and they both get hurt, your season is over.

 

Sure it could pay off. But it really seems like a crazy risk to me. (regardless of what we give up) Oakland knows how hard it is to have your Ace (and his salary) hurt for a small market team. What makes anyone think we are in a different situation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jenkins

Vargas

Braun

 

for

 

Harden

Chavez

the Douche

 

 

That is absurd. First, Chavez hasn't hit the ball well since 2004. Since then his average has never topped .269 and his ops has never topped .795, and they are steadily dropping. Plus, he is making $9.5 million this year. That is what Braun, who might already be a better hitter, will make in the next several years combined. He is a good fielder, but he's not the most durable player either. Harden has great stuff, so he would be a nice guy to get for cheap. The A's will never let him go for cheap, and the Brewers shouldn't even consider giving up a top prospect (Braun, Inman, etc.) for such a huge injury risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
We already have a lot of salary tied up in a pitcher who has had health problems.

 

Harden is making $2m this year, $4.5m in 2008 and has a club option for $7m in 2009. He wouldn't be a huge financial burden if he continued his health record, but if he stays healthy he'd be a huge bargain.

 

And if you're worried about carrying two pitchers with health concerns, we have some depth in Villanueva, Gallardo, Jackson and Parra (assuming Vargas and Inman are included in the deal). Not to mention Sheets may be gone in a year anyways and it'd be great to have another pitcher of Harden's calibar to take his place in the rotation.

 

The only concern in obtaining Harden is what you'd give up, which shouldn't be as much as you would if he didn't have the injury history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...