Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Todd Coffey/Dan Kolb comparison


JohnBriggs12
I'm surprised nobody else has brought it up, but I'm struck by how similar Coffey appears to the Dan Kolb of 2003 and 2004. Kolb hadn't done much prior to the Brewers picking him up in his late 20's similar to Coffey's situation. Both feature mid 90's sinking fastballs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Coffey was better than his numbers suggest in 2007 with a 4.04 xFIP to go with that 5.82 ERA. He has a somewhat decent but not spectacular track record. I don't know what happened with Kolb in 2003 but he had never pitched like that before and he never pitched like that again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think thats an excellent comparison Briggs. Kolb had an ERA under 5 in 68 games with the Rangers. Thats very similar to Coffey pre-Brewers, Kolb's is just a little smaller sample size. Like you mention, they have similar sinkers, along with very good heat on their 4-seamer, and battle conditioning issues.

 

Kolb eventually lost some of his velocity and became less effective, likely due to his long history of injury. Coffey has always been healthy, hopefully he can continue his awesomeness.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"88.6% of all statistics are made up right there on the spot" Todd Snider

 

-Posted by the fan formerly known as X ellence. David Stearns has brought me back..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to compare pitchers in general and relievers even more so. Even stats are less trustworthy for predicting future success in part because of the limited sample sizes. Not to mention they can learn a new pitch or finally get some control of one they could throw for strikes in the past.

According to the JS today Coffey seems to have been with a team that didn't like sinking fastballs and preferred him to throw his 4 seemer more. I don't know if that is just Coffey trying to explain his lack of success or if the Reds can really be that stuck on certain pitches that they fail to allow the pitcher to use his best stuff. Seems silly to me if that is true but so far Coffey has found something he hadn't in the past. I'm kind of hoping it was the Reds not using him right since that would mean he has a better chance of continued success if it was just the wrong fit there.

There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the JS today Coffey seems to have been with a team that didn't like sinking fastballs and preferred him to throw his 4 seemer more. I don't know if that is just Coffey trying to explain his lack of success or if the Reds can really be that stuck on certain pitches that they fail to allow the pitcher to use his best stuff. Seems silly to me if that is true but so far Coffey has found something he hadn't in the past. I'm kind of hoping it was the Reds not using him right since that would mean he has a better chance of continued success if it was just the wrong fit there.
That's interesting to hear, but I have a hard time believing that the Reds would be against him throwing a sinking fastball, especially with how Great American Ballpark plays as a bandbox for anything hit in the air. Maybe they had a good reason for it (maybe it just wasn't effective enough at that point to use, or he had spotty success with it like a Ben Sheets change-up), but I'd be all for a guy keeping the ball on the ground if I was working with the Reds.

 

Here is the article in question, for anyone who wants to read it. For as much (deserved) crap TH gets for his blog stuff, he still does a good job with profiles like these.

"[baseball]'s a stupid game sometimes." -- Ryan Braun

Twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the same thought during Sunday's game. Kolb went through a huge drop in velocity when he flamed out, though. Wasn't he throwing close to 100mph when he first joined? IIRC, he was down to low 90s by the time we traded him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still stick by my comparison of last September...he's like David Weathers. Same stuff, same build
Coffey has a non-negative chin, though.

 

It still would've been nice to have had David Weathers on the Brewers over all these years since he netted us . . . Ruben Quevedo. Ouch. That wasn't a good one, Dean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still stick by my comparison of last September...he's like David Weathers. Same stuff, same build
Maybe Weathers 10 years ago but certainly not now. Weathers stuff isn't close to Coffey velocity-wise now. Weathers sinker is now 86-88. Coffey's is 93-95. Weathers uses his slider a lot more than Coffey does too who throws 80-90% fastballs.

 

Kolb had the same hard sinker as Coffey. It's true in his second time around as a Brewer he had lost 3-4 mph off it. He also lost some command.

 

Coffey as a Brewer has been able to command that sinker much like Kolb did his first time around as a Brewer. Anyone that can command a mid 90's sinker is going to have success but it's a tough pitch to command consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's interesting to hear, but I have a hard time believing that the Reds would be against him throwing a sinking fastball, especially with how Great American Ballpark plays as a bandbox for anything hit in the air. Maybe they had a good reason for it (maybe it just wasn't effective enough at that point to use, or he had spotty success with it like a Ben Sheets change-up), but I'd be all for a guy keeping the ball on the ground if I was working with the Reds.

 

Here is the article in question, for anyone who wants to read it. For as much (deserved) crap TH gets for his blog stuff, he still does a good job with profiles like these.

 

Check fangraphs-they made Coffey into a fastball slider guy last year. Tyrying to figure out a Dusty Baker lead team just isn't worth it. That doesn't mean anything for Coffey's previous years but it can help to explain his flameout last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...