Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Sheets watch, Part 2: Had surgery 2/10, Brewers may need to pay for it


logan82

It appears Sheets has a torn flexor tendon and we might be on the hook for the surgery. Link

 

-----

Moderator's Note: The old Sheets Watch thread was getting overly long and burdensome to page through. This will be the start of a new Sheets Watch thread. The old thread c an still be found by clicking here.

Fan is short for fanatic.

I blame Wang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Mystery solved. Nobody will touch him if he needs surgery, at least not anytime soon. Brewers probably knew more than they let on. That explains why they were reluctant to give up a pick themselves because they can kiss the one they would have received for Sheets goodbye. It's probably in the Brewers interest to pay for the surgery voluntarily.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the brewers knew more than they were letting on why would they have offered him arbitration? I don't think they could keep Sheets in the dark about the extent of the injury and if he knew it was worse than they let on he would have accepted arby. I might be time to start questioning our medical staff's abilities somewhat. I know it's not an exact science but obviously Texas doctors saw something the Brewers didn't.
There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I bet he is just kicking himself for turning down arbitration, not that wasnt kicking himself already. If he has this surgery is he out all of 2009? He could have made probably $11 million from arby and not pitched a single pitch all season. Too bad the Brewers won't be getting any picks for him, though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why offer him arbitration? That's easy. His contract would not have been guaranteed if he accepted arbitration. This also explains why Sheets didn't accept arbitration. Had he done so, he would have gone to camp, not passed his physical and the Brewers would have waived him. Both the Brewers and Sheets were better off seeing if after a couple more months he would have healed enough to pass somebody's physical.

 

Obviously he couldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I bet he is just kicking himself for turning down arbitration, not that wasnt kicking himself already. If he has this surgery is he out all of 2009? He could have made probably $11 million from arby and not pitched a single pitch all season. Too bad the Brewers won't be getting any picks for him, though.

 

No he couldn't. FA accepting arbitration don't get guaranteed money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might be time to start questioning our medical staff's abilities somewhat.

 

Yep. Some quackery might be a good explanation for all of this. Brewers and Sheets are relying on their Drs., so they both think Ben is healthier than he is.

 

This sucks. I really wanted to see Ben get a good contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In any other year the Brewers may still have got the picks. There have been several teams in the past who signed a guy coming off surgery to a multi year deal with the hope the second season would come cheap enough to off set the lost one. This year I just don't see that happening.

So the brewers went from losing Sheets and CC for four picks in the top two rounds to a sandwich and a second with Sheets injury and Texeria signing with NY.

There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this would answer one question but it only brings about more. Who the heck advised him not to get surgery initially? Why did the Brewers offer arbitration, and why did Sheets decline it? It all seems to come back to the team doctors (or whoever it was who made the call). This is just crappy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sucks. I really wanted to see Ben get a good contract.

It really is a crummy situation all the way around for everyone involved. Sad, even. This is Ben's prime.

Beyond this, weren't the team doctors the one who initially said Yo was OK after his collison in Chicago last year, not just to pitch, but after the game as well?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still wonder why Ben didn't get all that much attention before the Rangers deal. Maybe other deals have fallen through/failed other tests with other teams? Something still doesn't seem right about this situation. If he wasn't going to need surgery as originally thought, why was there still little interest?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FA accepting arbitration don't get guaranteed money.

 

Are you 100% sure about this? I know that teams can cut a player and not pay the whole salary, but I am pretty sure that a team that offers arbitration and then releases the player owes a certain amount (1/3 or 1/6 of the salary, something like that).

 

If there was absolutely no risk regarding arbitration, why would any team not offer it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sucks. I really wanted to see Ben get a good contract.

 

So did I. Sheets was always a very entertaining and down to earth guy in interviews.

 

ESPN just reported that surgery for this type of injury usually requires 9-10 months of recovery time. Link

 

Free-agent pitcher Ben Sheets is considering elbow surgery that would probably keep him out for most, if not all, of the 2009 season, according to a major league source familiar with Sheets' medical prognosis.

Fan is short for fanatic.

I blame Wang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The piece that is news to me is that the Rangers and Sheets had agreed to a 2-year deal. We knew they were in talks, but recent reports were that the talks were dead.

 

The article said they agreed late last week, and the rumors that talks were dead came early this week. So it makes perfect sense. He went in for his physical late last week, didn't pass, and thus the talks were dead.

 

I might be time to start questioning our medical staff's abilities somewhat. I know it's not an exact science but obviously Texas doctors saw something the Brewers didn't.

 

I don't quite understand this logic. The Brewers medical staff looked at Sheets what? 3 months ago? I'm willing to bet that some of this was on Sheets. There is a reason the Brewers hardly attempted to sign Sheets after he declined arbitration. The Brewers doctors could have said "There's a 90% chance you'll need surgery, 10% chance you can rehab." And maybe Sheets was hoping he could rehab well enough to get a big deal before he needed surgery. If the Brewers would have signed Sheets to a big deal, and then noticed he'd need surgery, then I'd question the medical staff. But it's hard to place blame on them... because there is a reason the Brewers didn't pursue him as a FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought there was a difference between pre-free agency arbitration contracts and arbitration contracts for players who filed for free agency. I can try to find it but if someone has the answer it'll save me some google time.
There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the team is on the hook for some of the contract but not all in that situation. The Brewers did this with Vargas and saved like a million bucks or something.

 

JB12 is 100% correct that the contract is not guaranteed -- but as other have pointed out, the Brewers would be on the hook for a non-trivial amount of $$$.

 

If he wasn't going to need surgery as originally thought, why was there still little interest?

 

Because he is viewed as "injury prone" -- that and the draft picks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad, even. This is Ben's prime.

 

Nope - this was supposed to be Ben's prime. Ben's actual prime was 2003-2005.

 

So, as it turns out quite a few of the conspiracy theories actually had some merit to them. You really have to wonder what the team doctors saw/didn't see, and whether Sheets and his agent did their due diligence to get additional opinions - if he does need surgery in order to continue pitching, he could have been 5 months into his recovery by now if he got it done right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought there was a difference between pre-free agency arbitration contracts and arbitration contracts for players who filed for free agency.

 

There is a difference in regards to not being able to reduce a salary by more than 20%. I'm not aware of any difference regarding the guarantee of the contract, but I won't claim to be an expert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...