Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Cubs sign Aaron Miles 2yr/$4.9 million; DeRosa traded to Indians for 3 pitching prospects


JohnBriggs12

Eckstein was a better hitter and fielder than Miles and plays a tougher position.

 

The Cubs are probably 1-2 games worse than the team they fielded last year. They downgraded the bullpen, downgraded the lineup and to be honest I won't be surprised if the rotation isn't as good as last year with Zambrano's injury concerns and Dempster not that likely to repeat. If Harden manages to stay healthy the entire year it will probably still be an upgrade over last season but if he goes down I think they are worse than last year in every aspect of the game except fielding. Add in the fact it is an old team and will probably lose a little OPS here and there and I just don't see the Cubs being world series favorites.

 

They will be a good team, will probably win the division and then in the playoffs anything can happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it is possible that the Cubs are clearing room to add a higher priced player, it's also possible that they are clearing room because their ownership just went bankrupt and they're looking to sell the Cubs in a down economy.

 

DeRosa's a good player. Replacing him with Miles made the team worse.

 

Trading for Peavy would easily make them World Series favorites, so I hope that doesn't happen.

 

Milton Bradley has been left to walk from every team he's ever played on. I know the stat-guys don't think attitude matters, but for some reason the teams he's played with haven't wanted him back. One of the things that impressed me about the Cubs last year was how much they came together as a team. One example is when they saw Fukudome in ST and decided as a group that they'd work the count more, and everyone took more pitches and the team OBP went up. I almost hope they acquire Bradley. He'll disrupt team chemistry, play horrible CF defense and get hurt enough to throw any continuity out the window.

 

If the Cubs have this team cohesion then adding Bradley to a team that features Zambrano, Soriano and Ramirez isn't really something to worry about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just like the past three years, what the Cubs do or don't do hasn't really mattered to us making or missing the playoffs.

 

in the short-term, they've got a powerhouse team. but in the long-run, they could have some serious issues with their players getting older and slower, egos in the clubhouse and and wasteland of a farm system.

 

i think to worry that the Brewers haven't done anything yet is still somewhat premature. either MA can't add payroll or DM is trying to catch some last-minute bargains. heck, a month ago Giambi and Abreu were looking at three-year contracts, and now the talk is that they'd take a one-year deal. plus maybe some of our players will be worth more in trades once the remaining FAs are off the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in the short-term, they've got a powerhouse team. but in the long-run, they could have some serious issues with their players getting older and slower, egos in the clubhouse and and wasteland of a farm system.

They have their entire nucleus on long term deals - with most of them overpaid. They have (well, assuming they sign Bradley - which appears to be the case) two major players with significant injury histories. (Bradley and Harden) And they have a combustible clubhouse with Soriano, Zambrano, Bradley etc.

That is a perfect recipe for an October disaster.

DeRosa was the type of player who held the Cubs together. On that team, I think DeRosa is more valuable than Bradley.

 

Everyone can forget about the Peavy trade talks. It sounds like the Cubs have turned their attention 100% to Bradley. That will eliminate any real chance of adding Peavy's contract.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DeRosa just got traded to the Indians, too - only thing that makes this series of moves by the Cubs sane is if the package of players they get back for DeRosa gets added to Fontenot/Cedeno + a few prospects in a trade for Peavy. If the move is a straight salary dump - replace DeRosa with Miles or Fontenot/Cedeno at 2nd, the Cubs just got worse.

 

Bingo. Unless they expect contributions from the pitching they got for DeRosa, or to flip them for other Major League talent, they got worse by replacing DeRosa for Miles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Harden manages to stay healthy the entire year it will probably still be an upgrade over last season

 

That Harden/Gaudin pickup was a great trade imo. Sure, Harden has injury concerns, but no pitcher doesn't (even if his are stronger than most). When he's healthy, he's an awesome performer.

Stearns Brewing Co.: Sustainability from farm to plate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love this move. Mark Derosa really seemed to be one of those guys who never got a shot to play full time, and when he did, he turned out to be awesome. Seriously, the last two seasons have been career years for this guy, and they just shipped him to make room for Aaron Miles.

 

Harden, by the way, is not just another injury risk. He pitched as many innings in a Cubs uniform (71) as had in the two previous seasons (72 1/3) combined. His innings pitched in 2008 were equal to almost 75% of his innings since 2005. Seriously, this guy's innings high is 189 once, then 148, then such grand totals as 128, 46, and 25. This guy makes Ben Sheets look like CC Sabathia, innings-wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saying they're shipping him off for Aaron Miles probably isn't accurate. The Cubs thought that they were too right-handed, and DeRosa was one of the few right-handed guys they could move this season (Lee, Ramirez, Soriano, and Soto certainly aren't going anywhere). I'd be surprised if they play Miles more than Mike Fontenot -- at the very least, there's going to be a Fontenot/Miles platoon, but it's more likely that Fontenot's the full-time guy at second base now. Still a downgrade from DeRosa, but it's not as bad as having Aaron Miles in your starting infield.

"[baseball]'s a stupid game sometimes." -- Ryan Braun

Twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do we talk about the Cubs? Right now they're 10 games better than the Crew. We're not going to make up those ten games, so what gives? We should be concentrating on the Cards, which I assmue Melvin is doing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Harden/Gaudin pickup was a great trade imo. Sure, Harden has injury concerns, but no pitcher doesn't (even if his are stronger than most). When he's healthy, he's an awesome performer.

 

He is an awesome performer for about 5 innings. The one knock on him, other than the injuries, is he rarely goes deep in games. In fact if you look at 08 he went 5.92 which was the inning/game rate since 04 when he averaged just over 6 innings over 31 games. 04 Was the only time he went 31 games with an ERA of 3.99. Add in the fact that he spent more time on IR than the field the next several years and it seems apparent he can not be reasonably expected to pitch an average of six innings ever again in his career. At this point it seems the best you can expect is 5ish inning and maybe he can go all year. Great pitcher to me means one who can ptich at a high level and eat innings. As long as you have a good bullpen behind him he's certainly one you can win with. But greatness to me are guys who can reasonable be expected to finish what they start a fair amount of time.

There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miles has solid defensive numbers and a decent OBP. Looks like a prototypical utility infielder to me. I'd rather have him than Counsell plus he does seem to kill the Brewers. If he's being signed as a back up then it's a good signing. Didn't we pay Counsell $3 mil a year? I'd take this deal over that anytime.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I think the Counsell signing and the Miles signing are not comparable is because of the makeup of the rest of the roster. Right or wrong Melvin signed Counsell to help the young core of players learn how to handle a pennant race all season long. The Cubs have a roster full of veterans, most of whom have several years of play of experience. Miles was singed for his on field performance alone. Counsell was for both on field and off field reasons.
There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miles has solid defensive numbers and a decent OBP

 

He doesn't really have either of these things, though. His career OBP is .329, last year's .355 was fueled by an unsustainable line drive rate and a really high BABIP. If he hits .280-.290 like he should, he'll be right at .320 OBP again.

 

I don't know what you're referencing for "solid defensive numbers". UZR says he's about -3 runs at second and quite a bit worse at shortstop. PRM didn't like him last year at all: 93 ratio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harden, by the way, is not just another injury risk. He pitched as many innings in a Cubs uniform (71) as had in the two previous seasons (72 1/3) combined. His innings pitched in 2008 were equal to almost 75% of his innings since 2005. Seriously, this guy's innings high is 189 once, then 148, then such grand totals as 128, 46, and 25. This guy makes Ben Sheets look like CC Sabathia, innings-wise.

 

To add to this he hasn't just had one recurring problem either. Harden has something like 5-6 different points of injury on his arm/shoulder. The odds of him staying healthy for even half a season are really low. They might get lucky of course but most likely you are looking at 100 IP or so out of him.

 

The reason the Miles signing is bad was because they had plenty of mediocre MI with more upside than Miles. Fontenot, DeRosa, Theriot, Cedeno. Trading DeRosa for prospects to make room for Miles is a clear downgrade unless those prospects can help this year and I don't think they were expected to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are owned by a cash strapped entity that has just filed for bankruptcy and they are trying to sell the team in a tough environment. Just prior to putting the team on the market they added a huge amount of payroll with Soriano, Marquis and Lilly along with huge bumps in salary for some of their own guys. Adding a bunch of overhead that inhibits the new owner from remaking the team as he sees fit does not help sell a team. Put all that together it's hard to claim trading DeRosa for what they did is anything other than a salary dump. I'm not sure if it was done to add flexibility to sign someone else for that money or just a way to trim the payroll. Either way it seems they are not going to be adding payroll.
There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...