Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Cubs sign Aaron Miles 2yr/$4.9 million; DeRosa traded to Indians for 3 pitching prospects


JohnBriggs12

Recommended Posts

This is just their Craig Counsell move, I'd have to think. I'm not jealous about this at all. If they actually want to play him a lot, so much the better for Milwaukee.

 

The bigger problem is that the Cubs are rumored to be on the verge of signing Milton Bradley, who led the AL in OBP and OPS last season. He doesn't usually play many games because of injuries but when he is on the field, he is very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just their Craig Counsell move, I'd have to think. I'm not jealous about this at all. If they actually want to play him a lot, so much the better for Milwaukee.

 

Yeah, he's just like Counsell only he's younger and can hit. Oh and they got him for less than the Brewers paid Counsell.

 

They also are on the verge of trading DeRosa for young pitching from Cleveland. Both the DeRosa and Marquis moves opened up salary to pay Bradley.

Hendry is not sitting on his hands after a 97 win season.

 

Meanwhile Melvin can't move Cameron, won't move Hart or Weeks, and hasn't sniffed either any decent FA pitcher, starter or reliever, or a decent FA bat. Maybe he will, but so far all we have is Trot Nixon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the type of depth move the Brewers can't afford right now. There is nothing lost that the Cubs signed Miles, but for them he's not a bad 4th MIF option. This would have been wasted cash for the Crew.
Stearns Brewing Co.: Sustainability from farm to plate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Miles can hit, so can Counsell. Miles' carer OPS+ is 77 and Counsell's is 78. I'm not saying the Brewers got a good deal on Craig.

 

Miles OPS+ in 2008: 99. Counsell's was 76 and that was an improvement over the 65 and 69 in his other two seasons as a Brewer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Counsell is also better defensively than Miles. Not to say that I thought Counsell was a particularly good deal, but veteran utilitymen are pretty interchangable, just with different plusses and minusses.

 

What's curious is that I didn't know the Cubs needed another middle infielder. Especially one that's no great shakes at SS.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miles OPS+ in 2008: 99. Counsell's was 76 and that was an improvement over the 65 and 69 in his other two seasons as a Brewer.

 

Since Counsell isn't on the team next year what does it matter? If you are comparing Melvin and Hendry getting a 4th infielder it should be compared to what Melvin does for his bench for next year not what he did for last year's team.

None of the moves either team has made so far are ones that has any sort of time restraint on them. This move could as easily been made in January as it was today so I don't know why it's a big deal that Hendry made it now and Melvin is taking more time to make that sort of deal.

There needs to be a King Thames version of the bible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DeRosa just got traded to the Indians, too - only thing that makes this series of moves by the Cubs sane is if the package of players they get back for DeRosa gets added to Fontenot/Cedeno + a few prospects in a trade for Peavy. If the move is a straight salary dump - replace DeRosa with Miles or Fontenot/Cedeno at 2nd, the Cubs just got worse.

 

looking at the prospects involved with the Derosa/Indians deal, and I don't see them being part of a Peavy deal at all...nothing special. If anything, this trade and a possible trade of Marquis to the Rockies frees up money for the Cubs to sign Milton Bradley, who I would assume would be their centerfielder (and not a good one defensively at that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miles OPS+ in 2008: 99.

 

Miles BABIP in 2008: .343

 

First season in his career that he batted over .290, and he nearly hit .320. Now Briggs, I hope you're not going to argue that he's suddenly become a .320 batter, because that's about what he has to hit (given his low BB rate & lack of power) to provide anything more than marginal value (as Ennder noted). The Cubs just overpaid for at best mediocrity & in all likelihood a replacement-level player.

Stearns Brewing Co.: Sustainability from farm to plate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two days ago, Cubs fans were even more disgruntled about their team's lack of moves than Brewers fans are now. Miles is a meaningless signing, and getting Bradley would just replace what they lost in DeRosa. I could see them spinning some of the prospects from a DeRosa trade into a deal for Peavy, but I've been bracing for that deal all winter anyway and I'm not convinced Peavy without the benefit of Petco would make the Cubs all that much better. They were going to win the division next year, anyway, even if the Brewers signed Sabathia, Sheets, and everyone under the sun.

 

NSBB's thread on the DeRosa trade says they're getting Jeff Stevens, Chris Archer, and John Gaub -- anyone know if those are the type of guys that San Diego would have interest in for Peavy, or are they just the type of mid-level guys you'd expect to get in return for a solid player like DeRosa?

"[baseball]'s a stupid game sometimes." -- Ryan Braun

Twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stevens is the best of the three pitchers in the Derosa deal I think...he is an interesting relief prospect, lots of Ks and apparently good stuff, but he's 25 and hasn't yet pitched in the big leagues...and relief prospects aren't usually the most valuable commodities around. (He's a former Loyola Marymount teammate of Steve Kahn, for those who follow Brewers drafts.) This looks like a salary dump more than anything, though it's possible that SD likes a minor league reliever..they seem to have an eye for these guys.

 

I'm not sure I'd get bent out of shape about seeing our rivals replacing DeRosa with Miles, though it's a lefty bat and they've been looking to add lefties. (As have the Brewers, apparently.) That's a step backwards, IMO. Bradley is of course hugely talented, a great hitter when he's healthy. The questions about his durability and personality can't be overlooked, though...perhaps he and Zambrano will serve as calming influences on one another. Between Derosa and Marquis the Cubs have cleared a bunch of salary...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hated Miles as a Cardinal so I imagine I will hate him and he will kill us as a Cub to. He is like a more talented Eckstein.

You mean less talented right?

No, I mean Miles is more talented then Eckstein. But he is that same kind of scrappy little player who always kills the Brewers.

Formerly BrewCrewIn2004

 

@IgnitorKid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it is possible that the Cubs are clearing room to add a higher priced player, it's also possible that they are clearing room because their ownership just went bankrupt and they're looking to sell the Cubs in a down economy.

 

DeRosa's a good player. Replacing him with Miles made the team worse.

 

Trading for Peavy would easily make them World Series favorites, so I hope that doesn't happen.

 

Milton Bradley has been left to walk from every team he's ever played on. I know the stat-guys don't think attitude matters, but for some reason the teams he's played with haven't wanted him back. One of the things that impressed me about the Cubs last year was how much they came together as a team. One example is when they saw Fukudome in ST and decided as a group that they'd work the count more, and everyone took more pitches and the team OBP went up. I almost hope they acquire Bradley. He'll disrupt team chemistry, play horrible CF defense and get hurt enough to throw any continuity out the window.

"The most successful (people) know that performance over the long haul is what counts. If you can seize the day, great. But never forget that there are days yet to come."

 

~Bill Walsh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eckstein can play short, Miles can't. Eckstein is(well,was) better.

He did spend about 20% of last season at shortstop for St.Louis; but then again, he also took the mound for them (so he can play short, no comment on whether he can play short well). They're probably looking for (economic) versatility like they are losing from DeRosa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...