Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Claudio Vargas released


homer
  • Replies 227
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I've got two things against Vargas. First, he was released by the Washington Nationals before he signed with the D-Backs and was traded to the Brewers. How good can you really be if you were released by the Nationals? Second, he once mocked Brewer fans that were doing the "O" chant during a Lyle Overbay hitting streak when he was with the D-backs. The image is still burned in my mind.

I think we'll forget about this move in April when Yovanni Gallardo makes his debut and Seth McClung is designated for assignment. There are likely to be plenty of similar pitchers on the waiver wire in the next week. Plus, we need McClung to remind us of the glory days of red haired fireballers like Ron Robinson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check around the league and see how many teams are paying $3 million for their 7th best starter.

Well that's kind of irrelevant since he's better than many #5s out there. In today's marketplace, $3 mil for a MLB SP is a good deal. Though I agree for the Brewers, not spending this money may be a wise move. The bigger joke of a contract, though, is Mota's.

Stearns Brewing Co.: Sustainability from farm to plate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Melvin keeps getting his spring training bluffs called and it keeps costing the team money. Melvin may be waiting to pick up another Dave Burba off waivers, releasing McClung when he does. I can't imagine counting on McClung in that role.

 

And the notion that Mota is apparently worth more than Vargas hurts my brain. If you look at it all as a whole, none of it makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suddenly that Doug Davis trade last year doesn't seem as good. Aquino tanked right away, and a year later we had to essentially let go of two of the pieces of the trade. You could argue that Estrada did get us the inside track on Mota, but that doesn't excite me. I can't help but feel that DM is losing his touch.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well obviously Vargas was at best the #7 starter, so I don't know how you can figure that he is worth $3 million. What's that you say? He'd be worth $3 million for someone that needs a starter? Apparently not. I'll say it again....Claudio Vargas at $3.6 million and whatever you have to give up is not worth it for good teams, who will get someone better when they need to. And he's not worth it to bad teams even if he's better than 3 of those teams starters, because he wouldn't get your team closer to the playoffs, and is not a building block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, this is the most support Vargas has ever recieved here.

 

i don't see what the big deal really is. depth is nice, but it also leaves a lot of players really upset. and to save a couple million dollars i'd take the risk on ZJ starting over Vargas, too. plus maybe every so often ZJ will make it past the 6th inning and not wreck the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could argue that Estrada did get us the inside track on Mota

 

No, I don't think you could -- I am pretty sure we could have traded that Maxim St. Pierre guy for Mota if we would have picked up Mota's salary.

 

I can't imagine counting on McClung in that role.

 

Yeah. The only role McClung should be counted on for is Frankenstein.

 

And the notion that Mota is apparently worth more than Vargas hurts my brain. If you look at it all as a whole, none of it makes sense.

 

We are married to Mota for awhile. We wasted $3M on Mota and another $900K on Vargas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big question that I have is how is Manny Parra going to pitch into October if we are blessed with playing that long? I wonder if they have a plan for that?
The answer is simply that Parra would not pitch out of the starting rotation in October, rotations normally shorten to the top 3 pitchers, which I'm guessing would be Sheets, Suppan, and Yo as Suppan is the only starting pitcher on the team who's pitched in the playoffs. Whomever the 4th and 5th starters are would likely pitch out of the bullpen at that time ( 2 of MP, DB, CV).

"You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation."

- Plato

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something."

- Plato

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suddenly that Doug Davis trade last year doesn't seem as good.

 

There's nothing sudden about it. Ennder may appear to say that Davis and Vargas are the same guy, but I think most everyone else would agree that the Brewers came out behind in the deal...releasing Vargas doesn't really change the analysis much, though it does eliminate any further chances of him saving the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's that you say? He'd be worth $3 million for someone that needs a starter? Apparently not.

The rub of it was that teams weren't interested since he doesn't have options left. He's easily worth $3 mil. as a SP.

Stearns Brewing Co.: Sustainability from farm to plate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 W's out the #5 spot in the rotation for two teams playing .500 ball at best over the course of 2 years definitely doesn't hurt your chances of making the playoffs

 

I was told there would be no math on this portion of the test. My brain hurts.

 

I'll go the sabermatrician's route and say that I'm not all that concerned about prior year win totals, or wins in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sad we allowed Vargus to leave. We all knew he was not one of our 5th best starting pitchers. What I'm most sad about is that melvin didn't trade his #3,4 or 5 starter for some quality player when we had the starting pitching depth to do so. Parra and Villenueva and possibly bush would have actually brought us back a nice , decent posion player two months ago. . Now we cannot afford to trade our #3-5 starters for anybody because we no longer have the pitching depth to do so.

 

I' m sure glad we got Mota and McClung or else, we'd be lost on a subway to duluth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most everyone else would agree that the Brewers came out behind in the deal...

 

I was happy the Brewers moved Davis. The only thing that troubles me is if DM saw any value in Estrada/Aquino/Vargas.

 

Im ok with Davis being in AZ making $7M+ per year, however this reminds me of the Linebrink deal -- I was not against trading Inman, but I feel like DM whiffed on Thatcher and overvalued Linebrink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer is simply that Parra would not pitch out of the starting rotation in October, rotations normally shorten to the top 3 pitchers, which I'm guessing would be Sheets, Suppan, and Yo ...
Actually, if we are still playing in October, the answer is probably that one of those 3 starters is probably not on the team yet, and won't be until sometime in July.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm stunned by the fact that there was (or apparently was) no trade market for Vargas. No one wants this guy, so the Brewers just have to release him? I thought he might have a shot to do well this year, especially with the fact that he seemed to do well in ST. In Doug I trust, but I'm befuddled right now. Please Dougie, pull a rabbit out of your hat!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got no problem with this move. Yeah, keeping Vargas would be good for depth in the rotation, but depth is not worth that much money. I don't think Zack Jack or Narveson would be that much worse than Vargas. I'm not sure that Mota or McClung have more value than Claudio, but Melvin must have felt bullpen depth was more important than rotation depth.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this means that the team really liked what they saw out of Chris Narveson this spring. I remember watching him while I was down at spring training and thinking that he couldn't be any worse than Vargas. It's possible they view Narveson as a low-cost equivalent (or at least near-equivalent) to Vargas.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm stunned by the fact that there was (or apparently was) no trade market for Vargas. No one wants this guy, so the Brewers just have to release him?

 

Other teams wanted to do what the Brewers wanted with Vargas - have him spend a portion of the year at AAA. Since he has no options left, there weren't any takers.

 

It's possible they view Narveson as a low-cost equivalent (or at least near-equivalent) to Vargas.

 

Yes, and as others mentioned, ZachJack is there too.

Stearns Brewing Co.: Sustainability from farm to plate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Brewer Fanatic Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Brewers community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of Brewer Fanatic.

×
×
  • Create New...